Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    3 ways The Great Gatsby could change 3D movies

    After director Baz Luhrmann dishes details on his upcoming adaptation of the literary classic, critics are no longer dubious — they're excited

    On the surface, The Great Gatsby seems like an unusual choice for a 3D movie. But that's precisely the kind of film that director Baz Luhrmann (Moulin Rouge) is making. At first, devotees of the F. Scott Fitzgerald classic — about a tangled web of New York social climbers in the Jazz Age — raised their eyebrows upon learning that the literary masterpiece was getting the 3D treatment most closely associated with Avatar and Transformers. But after a recent New York Times outline of Luhrmann's motivations and aspirations for a 3D Gatsby, skeptics aren't just on board — they're excited. Starring Leonardo DiCaprio, Tobey Maguire, and Carey Mulligan, The Great Gatsby will be released in December 2012. Here, three reasons it could change how 3D films are made:

    1. Gatsby could prove that 3D enhances actor-driven films
    If it succeeds, says Michael Cieply at The New York Times, The Great Gatsby would usher in the use of 3D technology for an entirely new genre of films. Luhrmann's movie will serve as a litmus test: Can 3D "actually serve actors as they struggle through a complex story set squarely inside the natural world," as opposed to the spectacular fantasy landscapes of animated and action films? Luhrmann won't use 3D to portray scope and action — he wants to create intimacy to "help audience members feel like they're in the room with the characters," says Margaret Lyons at New York.

    2. Luhrmann could put 3D front and center at the Oscars
    Recent Academy Awards seasons have been missing "the heat of a film that breaks a barrier," says Cieply. It's been years since a Best Picture truly altered the face of cinema like The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King, "the first Oscar winner to be anchored in its make-up for fantasy effects. No 3D film has won Best Picture, perhaps because none has found the right balance of Avatar-like scope and sophisticated, intimate drama. Luhrmann's ambitious project could change that.

    3. It could encourage more 3D literary adaptations 
    A worthy film adaptation of Gatsby has long "seemed to elude filmmakers," despite several tries, says Cieply. But considering the book's "strangely operatic plot," 3D might just finally "unlock the movie potential." A mammoth $125 million budget also hints that this will at least be a Great Gatsby adaptation unlike any other, says S.T. Vanairsdale at Movieline. It's an "insane amount of money" to spend on a story "that you can probably read faster than you can watch." But it also proves that the studio has faith that this really could "turn out to be the greatest literary adaptation since The Godfather," and could inspire future adaptations of historically tricky source material.

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    6 comments

    • Doug S  •  Annapolis, Maryland  •  4 mths ago
      3D adds nothing to good movies, and doesn't save poor ones.
    • Gage1960  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      3D or nor 3D, The Great Gatsby was written for it's time. It has not aged well. Both movie versions have bombed at the box office. Doubt today's reality show generation will be intrigued by the lavish and insensitve lifestyle of the rich in the jazzy interlude between the Great War and Great Depression.
    • Heisenberg  •  4 mths ago
      Gotta sell those 3D TV's ... no media ... no set sales.
    • Nephilim  •  4 mths ago
      3-D is good for animated movies and some live action movie exceptions like Avatar (which is heavily animated). Other than that, the rest look more like a pop-up book more than 3-D.
    • tnag  •  4 mths ago
      God I hope this fails. Im so sick of 3-D. Its a gimmick and I hate wearing glasses in the theatre. Plus I hate spending the extra cash. Going to the movies is too expensive in 2-D as it is.
    • Mike  •  Winston-Salem, North Carolina  •  4 mths ago
      3-D movies are so yesterday and give the vast majority of people massive headaches. 3-D television is too ridiculous to even discuss. It would be wise to stop trying to force all this headache inducing 3-D CRAP on the public. It IS a GIMMICK that can be fun on occasion, but NOT for regular film viewing on a regular basis.