Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    5 Ways the World Will Change Radically This Century

    In terms of evolution, the species Homo sapiens is extremely successful. The populations of other species that are positioned similar to us on the food chain tend to max out at about 20 million. We, by contrast, took just 120,000 years to achieve our first billion members, and then needed only another 206 years to add 6 billion more. According to the United Nations Population Division, our population will hit 7 billion on Oct. 31, and though fertility rates have begun to decline across much of the globe, we're still projected to reach 9 billion by mid-century and level off at around 10 billion by 2100.

    A panel of academics met at Columbia University's Earth Institute on Monday (Oct. 17) to discuss the impacts of the human population explosion, including the ways in which it will change the face of the Earth this century. Here are five striking changes you — or your kids or grandkids — can expect to see.

    Shifting people

    Currently, it's a well-known fact that China is the most populous country in the world, and that Africa, though riddled with problems, is not necessarily overpopulated considering its size. These facts will drastically change. China's one-child policy has significantly curbed its growth, while in some African countries, the average woman gives birth to more than 7 children. [How Many People Can Earth Support?]

    According to Joel Cohen, a population biologist at Columbia University and the keynote speaker at Monday's conference, India's population will overtake China's around 2020, and sub-Saharan Africa's will overtake India's by 2040. Furthermore, "In 1950, there were three times as many Europeans as sub-Saharan Africans. By 2100, there will be five sub-Saharan Africans for every European. That's a 15-fold change in the ratio," Cohen said. "Could you imagine that that might have an impact, geopolitically and on international migration?"

    Jean-Marie Guehenno, former UN Under-Secretary General for Peacekeeping Operations and director of the Center for International Conflict Resolution at Columbia University's School of International and Public Affairs, said the migration of people from Africa to Europe will present a major challenge in the near future. "You can look at it as an enormous potential from a European standpoint … or you can say, '[Africa] is a continent that still has 15 percent that are not going to school,' and that can be seen as a threat," Guehenno said. "How are you going to manage that immigration so that this aging continent of Europe benefits from it while managing it? That is going to be a huge question."

    Urbanization

    Globally, the number of people living in urban areas matched and then overtook the number of rural people sometime in the past two years. The trend will continue. According to Cohen, the number of people living in cities will climb from 3.5 billion today to 6.3 billion by 2050. This rate of urbanization is equivalent to "the construction of a city of a million people every five days from now for the next 40 years," he said.

    Of course, new cities don't tend to get constructed; instead, cities that already exist tend to balloon. Guehenno argues that megacities become chaotic. "Urbanization is going to change the face of conflict in a big way. When you live in small towns and rural areas, there are all sorts of traditional conflict- resolution mechanisms. They are not all nice, but they create a sort of stable equilibrium," he said. "With the megacities that you see now in Africa, such as Monrovia (Liberia) and Kinshasa (Republic of Congo), we see cities where the dynamics are no more under control or have been lost. We are, I think, heading toward new types of conflicts — urban conflicts — and we haven't really thought through the implications of that."

    Water wars

    Not only has the human population exploded in the past two centuries, but the per-person consumption of resources — especially in industrialized nations — has grown exponentially. Scientists think that resource shortages will cause an escalation of conflicts during this century, and will widen the gulf between the rich and the poor — the haves and the have-nots.

    No resource is more precious and vital than water, and, according to economist Jeffrey Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia, there are already parts of the world that, because of the rapidly changing climate, are at a severe crisis point. "Take the Horn of Africa for example: Somalia's population has risen roughly fivefold since the middle of the 20th century," Sachs said. "Precipitation is down roughly 25 percent over the last quarter century. There's a devastating famine under way right now after two years of complete failure of rains, and [there is] the potential that this is entering a period of long-term climate change."

    Conflicts over water shortages will probably play out as class warfare, said Upmanu Lall, director of the Columbia Water Center. "Wealth inequality tends to grow as a country's population grows, and this is a very important point to note because per capita consumption of resources has been increasing dramatically. Couple that with inequity in income and couple that with [the issue of] the availability of water," Lall said. [How Much Water Is On Earth?]

    When you add it all up, you get this dire picture: As the population grows, there is less water per person. Meanwhile, the gap between the rich and the poor widens, and the rich demand more resources to accommodate their lifestyles. Inevitably, they will commandeer the water and other resources of the poor. In all likelihood, Lall said, this will lead to challenges, and perhaps class conflict.

    Future energy

    Currently, there isn't enough energy being extracted from known sources of fossil fuels to sustain 10 billion people. This means that humans will be forced to turn to a new energy source before the end of the century. However, it's a mystery what that new source will be.

    "Energy is the basic resource which underlies every other," said Klaus Lackner, director of the Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy. "And actually, technology is not quite ready to solve the [energy] problem. We know there's plenty of energy in solar, in nuclear, in carbon itself — in fossil carbon — for probably 100 or 200 years (if we are willing to clean up after ourselves and pay the extra to make that happen). But none of these technologies are quite ready. Solar has its problems and is still too expensive."

    Carbon storage — a technology that prevents carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from escaping into the atmosphere when fossil fuels are burned — is still on the drawing board, though it looks possible, he added. "And lastly, nuclear energy: if we were betting on that, we may have just lost that one," Lackner said, referring to the nuclear disaster in Fukushima, Japan, earlier this year.

    "Let me just give you a feeling how big today our energy consumption is: In New Jersey, the energy consumption exceeds the photosynthetic productivity of the same area if it were left pristine," Lackner said. "We have to have technology help us out. I am optimistic … that the technologies can be developed to solve these problems … but I am a pessimist because we lack the societal structures which would enable us to employ these technologies, and we could very well fall on our own faces."

    In short, the future will match one of these two pictures: Either some new, superior form of energy extraction (such as highly efficient solar panels) will be widespread, or the technology, or its implementation, will fail, and humanity will face a major energy crisis.

    Mass extinctions

    As humans spread, we leave scant room or resources for other species. "There is good evidence that we are in the sixth massive species extinction of the history of the planet, because of the incredible amount of primary production that we take as a species to maintain 7 billion of us," Sachs said.

    Aside from the lack of land and resources left for other species, we've also caused rapid changes to the global climate, with which many of them cannot cope. Some biologists believe that with the current rate of extinction, 75 percent of the planet's species will disappear within the next 300 to 2,000 years. These disappearances have already begun, and extinction events will become more and more common over the course of the century. [10 Species Our Population Explosion Will Likely Kill Off]

    This story was provided by Life's Little Mysteries, a sister site to LiveScience. Follow Natalie Wolchover on Twitter @nattyover. Follow Life's Little Mysteries on Twitter @llmysteries, then join us on Facebook.

     
    • drill4you  •  Boca Raton, United States  •  7 mths ago
      We are either very smart in identifying the problem or very stupid in not fixing it..
      • bri_mex 7 mths ago
        I vote for the second one. We have known for a long time now and still have done nothing about it.
      • Neil James 7 mths ago
        like the payment of government debt...it keeps being postponed to the next generation...then the next....then the next....eventually everything will fall apart.
      • Garnog 7 mths ago
        Or both
    • Bill  •  De Forest, United States  •  7 mths ago
      "We have met the enemy and he is us." Pogo.
    • Forward thinking  •  6 mths ago
      There should be no problem for the earth to support 10 billion people since the way man supports themselves changes over time. The earth could not support the 7 billion in it today if all people were still hunters and gatherers. Since mankind has learned and developed technology there is no reason to believe that we will not adapt to change in population again. In fact, underdeveloped areas have a unique advantage over developed areas since they can use different forms of energy and are not locked into the existing system. If there is a problem, it is due to lingering too long under one system, instead of using "modern" technology and advanced noncompeting systems in areas not yet developed.
    • Just  •  Minneapolis, United States  •  7 mths ago
      If Africa's population is going to keep growing like that, I don't think it would ever reach the number stated on the article since they can barely feed their starving population.
      • Grego 7 mths ago
        Nature will thin out the herd. When the population reaches critical mass, pestilence, disease,war, etc. will do it's thing. Overpopulation gives incentive to the 4 Horsemen to commence their deadly rides.
      • Joe Ricola 7 mths ago
        don't worry, us foolish white men will be conned into feeding them until they overrun us.
      • Leafs Rule 7 mths ago
        yeah! Joe' The Racist' Ricola
    • Madman Amawanajihad  •  7 mths ago
      Hey, don't blame me; I'm doing my part - no kids!
      • ᗪᗩᗰᖇᗩḰ 7 mths ago
        Most people are too self-centered and selfish to think that way...
      • Joeschmoe 7 mths ago
        Why would anyone from a western nation need to think that way?
        oh right the eugenics that spews forth from the mouths of the people you guys admire these days.
        Excellent. Do your part Vanboy.
        Dont forget to use newspeak as well
      • mike S 7 mths ago
        its the masses in asia and africa that are going to be the tax on water and energy supplies and wipe out the other species...however we are doing a good job at that here in the west too.
    • RealVoiceReason  •  Bangkok, Thailand  •  6 mths ago
      Great, nothing left but masses of starving humans that see little value in each other. Sounds like fun for them.

      The solution is so simple yet impossible to implement - population control

      Perhaps humans are not capable of working that out. I guess the 8th EE (Extinction Event) species will get the next shot. Not to worry, the Earth will have about 20 more EEs before the sun turns into a red dwarf and consumes Earth. If at first you don't succeed, try try again.
    • Arjuna  •  7 mths ago
      I wouldn't define overpopulation as "success" as a species. The suffering that will come as a result of failing to control population growth will overshadow all of the human suffering we have seen so far.

      By the way, NONE of my money is going to save starving children in Africa. That may seem callous, but for fifty years I have been watching us being bludgeoned with the message that we have a responsibility to do that. Baloney. They have a responsibility to stop producing children they can not feed.
      • James 7 mths ago
        You speak the truth. Unfortunately, the masses fear such ideas.
      • JD 7 mths ago
        That's right, we need to punish those starving children! They should have talked some sense into their parents before they were born, or something...
      • DeniseG 7 mths ago
        Do you think they have access to health care? Many of those women are also raped and end up pregnant. Yes, you are callous. Go live in Africa for one day and see ifyou feel the same.
    • SRH  •  7 mths ago
      All I want to know is: Will Yahoo! still be around so we can all keep making our Comments?
    • Peter Brendt  •  7 mths ago
      That proves, our scientists are too specialized. The biologist predicts numbers of population growth in Africa without even asking once the politologist and the mathematician, who would tell him, that in the time frame of his prediction starvation and draught would anyway kill away half of the people he has counted in his model while a share of the others will die in political conflicts.
      And then we have the environmentalists saying, we run out of water while we on the other hand know, enough energy provided would give us the ability to recycle water and use cleaned ocean water as well, but the environmentalists block any development in the energy sector and they don't ask the engineer who could calculate the real energy demands and what part of an energy mix can produce already with current technology.
      So, we know only one thing for sure: It will be different. Not entirely different maybe, but in such complex models even a tiny factor can change the whole outcome.
    • Don  •  7 mths ago
      There can be no other reason why, ya know we shoulda seen it coming. Consequences we cannot deny will be revealed in time. Glaciers melt as we pollute the sky, a sign of devastation coming. The time bomb is ticking and no one is listening, our future is fading. Is there any hope we'll survive. Still, we ravage the world that we love and the millions cry out to be saved. Our endless maniacal appetite left us with another way to die. Can we repent in time. Greed and hunger lead to our demise, a path I can't believe we followed. Dark agenda's rooted in a lie. Species fall before our very eyes, a world that they cannot survive in.

      It's up to everyone of us on this planet, is this how we want it to end, or do we change? And I mean, truly change as a whole.
    • Fenwick Babbit  •  Livonia, United States  •  7 mths ago
      Do not worry about the future, as the the population of the Earth increases and the demand for resources is exhausted, nature will, as always, take control of the situation.
    • Forward thinking  •  6 mths ago
      If one looks at the total population of the earth, we find different areas locked in different time periods. Most of Africa is much like Europe 2000 years ago, before technology, agriculture, establishment of cities, etc., While giant cities are now able to sustain large populations, they have done so by changing the life style of the people, the way we work, use energy, produce food, and share common goals.
    • B  •  7 mths ago
      If the major religions of the world care about it and its inhabitants they will start to promote birth control. If they don't it appears that all hell will break out. I doubt that God however you perceive God would want that. If your religion causes you to cause the destruction of the planet, pluck it out, for it is better to enter the kingdom of heaven as a benign atheist than be cast into hell as a hypocritical self serving religious fundamentalist.
    • Lee  •  7 mths ago
      No matter how big and powerful we imagine ourselves to be, Mother Nature will always have the final word.
    • Eric1  •  Providence, United States  •  6 mths ago
      Sounds like there will be plenty of 'wogs' and 'darkies' to eat in the coming years, which should be a comfort to old white people, previously worried about their 'ribs' and 'Sunday roasts.' Unless of course the 'dogs' and 'darkies' decide to do the 'uncivilized' thing and try to eat US first!
    • johnny666...  •  Edmonton, Canada  •  6 mths ago
      While everything that Natalie and her group said may be true, it does not go far enough and as far as they have gone so far could only be considered as Fear Mongering with out any way or means of what can be done or what we can do and only comming to a reaization that our very own extinction is eventually going to happen, no matter what we may do and all we can really do is to prolong our eventual out come or destiny, but also Space Exploration and eventual settlement on other planets and world may be the only solution left to be able to prolong our destinies even longer and that is if and I do mean if we would still have enough time to be able to do this which may already be way too late.
      Even if we did settle on other planets and worlds, what is there to say we do not do the very same thing as we do here on this very planet which we are the ones who are actually and mostly responsible for the destruction of our planet and world as we know it to be today and from our pasts.
      Our futures will always be in our possesion and control where we were responsible to be the protectors of our very own planet, we are also the ones who are doing this planet the most harm and we as a so called superior race and species must wake up from our deep and depressing slumber and really and truely do something to try to make things better any way we can which still will not be enough because we have already created way too much damage to our planet and other live forms who have no control over what we do ourselves etc.
    • El Duderino  •  Denver, United States  •  7 mths ago
      The level of ignorance about and disdain of science that we see in this country may well doom us. People seem to think that God will just take care of everything. And maybe he will - by wiping humans off the map.
    • *J*  •  7 mths ago
      One of the Republican presidential candidates made a statement a few days ago about oil resources in the USA lasting for something like 200 years. The implication appeared to be that we should pull that up as fast as we can because it's going to last for 200 years anyway.

      If you heard that statement and thought there was nothing wrong with it, you should watch "The Most Important Video You'll Ever See" (I'm sure you can figure out where to find it).

      You should also watch "Are Humans Smarter Than Yeast?"

      I think all politicians should be forced to watch these videos. It's not about doomsaying, it's about facing reality.
    • I Bring It  •  Omaha, United States  •  6 mths ago
      Georgia Guidestones first commandment - Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature. And second - 2.Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity. This two are very signifant.
    • I Bring It  •  Omaha, United States  •  6 mths ago
      I guess the Georgia Guidestones do have sense after all..
    [ [ [['A picture is worth a thousand words', 5]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/why-facebook-bought-instagram-4-theories-160400376.html', '[Related: Why Facebook bought Instagram: 4 theories]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 9]], 'http://contributor.yahoo.com/join/yahoonews_virginiabeach', '[Did you witness the jet crash? Share your story with Yahoo! News]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Dick Clark', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/dick-clark-dies-at-82-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/c/21/c217c61aa2d5872244c08caa13c16ec5.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'Reuters', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...
     
    Should Bill and Donna take on more risk to boost their business? Join the conversation.
    Remake America celebrates moms everywhere.
    Wounded veteran Kyle lost his hand during an explosion in Iraq.