Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Air Force Eyes Nuclear Reactors, Beamed Power for Spacecraft

    The U.S. Air Force has laid out a new vision for its energy science and technology needs over the next 15 years – a forecast that includes plans for space-based power stations  and the prospective use of small nuclear reactors for new spacecraft.

    The report, entitled "Energy Horizons: United States Air Force Energy S&T Vision 2011-2026," focuses on core Air Force missions in space, air, cyberspace and infrastructure. A series of Air Force mission-focused workshops and summits were held to shape the new strategy.

    The report was released Feb. 9 and details how the Air Force plans to increase energy supply, reduce demand and change military culture to meet mission requirements.

    "Energy is a center of gravity in war and an assured energy advantage can enable victory," said Mark Maybury, chief scientist for the United States Air Force. He spearheaded the report.

    "While energy is already an essential enabler," Maybury said. "Global competition, environmental objectives and economic imperatives will only increase its importance."

    Space is the "ultimate high ground," providing access to every part of the globe, including denied areas, the report explains. "Space also has the unique characteristic that once space assets reach space, they require comparatively small amounts of energy to perform their mission, much of which is renewable," it states. [Top 10 Space Weapons]

    Solar cell efficiencies

    In the sweeping report a number of desirable high-tech advances are mentioned.

    For example, the Air Force is currently limited to 27 kilowatt (kW) arrays for satellite power. But more power is required for some future space missions, the report states, such as flights currently being eyed by the Air Force, national security organizations and NASA. "Employing larger and more efficient arrays will enable missions that require very high power, such as space-based radar or space-based laser missions," the report states.

    In the long term, the report says, increased solar cell efficiencies and revolutionary materials foreshadow the potential of 500 kW on-orbit power generation technologies, "which would be transformational for performing missions from space-based systems."

    Furthermore, there are other breakthrough space energy technologies that have the potential of achieving up to 70 percent efficiency, the report adds. Examples include quantum dots and dilute nitrides in solar cells. But there are also totally new technologies such as space tethers that could harvest energy from the Earth's geomagnetic field. [Top 10 Alternative Energy Technologies]

    Space nuclear power

    In terms of nuclear power in space, several satellite systems have been energized by Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generators (RTG). This source provides consistent power, and at a much higher energy and power density than current technologies.

    Work on small modular nuclear reactors on Earth is highlighted in the Air Force report: "While the implementation of such a technology should be weighed heavily against potential catastrophic outcomes, many investments into small modular reactors can be leveraged for space-based systems. As these nuclear power plants decrease in size, their utility on board space-based assets increases."

    The report explains that the Air Force space systems portfolio should consider piloting small modular nuclear systems, a view previously recommended by the Air Force Scientific Advisory Board.

    Power beaming

    The Air Force report also delves into the wireless transfer of power, a technology that continues to offer big promises despite the daunting challenges involved in making it a reality.

    While there are many challenges in "space-to-earth" power beaming, "space-to-space power beaming" could be transformational, the report stresses.

    An energy-beaming benefit for the military is powering sets of fractionated, distributed satellite systems, the report explains. Doing so would enable spacecraft to be smaller, more survivable, and more capable than current systems.

    A power paradigm change

    In orbit, many spacecraft systems — sensors, communications equipment and on-board processing — can require intense amounts of power.

    Like all computing architectures, these systems are currently composed exclusively of silicon- based technology. However, decades of work has begun to change this paradigm, the report points out. Newer systems require less energy and offer a reduced thermal load in comparison to their silicon counterparts, the report adds.

    Advances in satellite propulsion are also spotlighted in the newly issued report. Today, the ability of space-based systems to alter their orbits is based on blasts of on-board fuel. The possibility of on-orbit refueling for these systems is now being studied.

    In the mid- and far-term, the report suggests, other propulsion technologies will provide exceptionally efficient propulsion. That will allow the fuel onboard orbiting systems to be utilized for longer periods of time. Hall and electric thrusters, for instance, promise extended utility of limited onboard propellants.

    Whatever the technology, new methods of generating power in space hold great promise for the Air Force's plans for new satellites and other space missions.

    The report's cover letter, signed by both Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz, explains how effective energy management not only plays a key role in supporting national objectives, but is also essential to operational readiness.

    "Energy is essential to all Air Force missions," the letter states. "Improving energy efficiency, reducing demand and changing the culture is vital to mission success."

    Click here to read the entire Air Force report on space power systems.

    Leonard David has been reporting on the space industry for more than five decades. He is a winner of last year's National Space Club Press Award and a past editor-in-chief of the National Space Society's Ad Astra and Space World magazines. He has written for SPACE.com since 1999.

     
    • Dorian  •  Kaiserslautern, Germany  •  3 mths ago
      Sounds like someone is working with some Tesla blueprints:-))
      • William 3 mths ago
        I agree-- sounds just like it.
      • Sean 3 mths ago
        Geez, it's taken long enough to get those ideas going!!
      • Mark Martin 3 mths ago
        Sounds like you're wrong. He worked purely with classical Maxwellian electrodynamics. A lot of the stuff in this article is way beyond him. He also didn't invent the idea of wireless power transmission. Any simple radio is an example of wireless power: the EM waves excite electric charges in the antenna; in other words, the EM wave delivers a small amount of power to the antenna. The trick is to deliver enough power to run more needy devices without cooking everything in-between. Wireless transmission was known in principle by others when Tesla was just a tot.
    • tjmwerewolf  •  Tyler, Texas  •  2 mths ago
      Well, if we could somehow beat the diseases known as government and organized religion into a bloody pulp, maybe some of these technologies could be developed AND maybe even used for exploration and various purposes other than warfare.

      But first things first.
      • i.s.! 2 mths ago
        sad, but true
      • Frank 2 mths ago
        These technologies would be used only if the CEOs could be convinced they make billions more in the next six months. If not, "eat the seed corn and grow fat in your own lifetime" would be the rule.
    • jpat1023  •  3 mths ago
      Oh cool....you guys finally dusted off those Tesla documents you stole over a hundred years ago.
      • Dr Woo Hoo 3 mths ago
        I may not believe in magical technology from Tesla, but your comment raises an interesting point.
      • jpat1023 3 mths ago
        I wouldn't expect you to believe me at face value. Skepticism is a good thing.

        But if it sparks your interest, I would definitely advise you do some research on Nikola Tesla...pretty fascinating stuff.

        A little intro.....
        JPMorgan (the actual guy) was financially backing Tesla and Edison's research back at the turn of the 19th century...Tesla's invention were about wireless power while Edison's were on the wire and could be metered.....Who do you think got the rug pulled out from under them??
      • ben haad 3 mths ago
        what about the technology that has been reversed engineered from the alien spacecraft our govt has covered up for half a century?? notice it is the air force? they r the ones that have covered up every ufo report thats ever been signifigant. now thay gonna come out and act like they invented these new technologys?
    • psionycx  •  2 mths ago
      Don't knock it. The Pentagon gets WAY more funding for space projects than NASA, and remember that the beloved Starfleet of Star Trek lore was a combined military/scientific agency. Odds are good that the Air Force will be able to fund development of power systems that we'll need for deep space exploration where NASA will not.
    • Perfect Stranger  •  3 mths ago
      I thought we figured all this out back in the sixties using dilithium crystals
      • veteran 3 mths ago
        nah captain the dilithium crystals are meltingand i canna hold her shes gonna blow
      • GaryL 3 mths ago
        Scotty, your fired!
      • Richard Dickman 3 mths ago
        But back then, the engineers were willing to "Spock around the clock". Much different than today's engineers.
    • POKER MONKEY  •  Biloxi, Mississippi  •  3 mths ago
      The beauty of a column like this is that 92% of the typical Yahoo readers never made it past the first two sentences...and as a result you actually get some interesting comments.
    • david r  •  2 mths ago
      NASA BUNCH OF LOSER GET AT REAL JOB ....I DON'T PAY FOR YA'LL DREAMS ....LUNATIC SPACE ...
    • Drew  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  2 mths ago
      Whatever the US does, we need to better protect it from the thieving Chinese and Russian.
      • Peter Wolf 2 mths ago
        thats for sure
      • Joshua 2 mths ago
        Yes; anything made in those countries will fall apart fast.
      • Charles 2 mths ago
        If the three of us cooperated for a change, we could do 3 times more good for the same costs.
    • Chlamydia Burns  •  Miami, Florida  •  3 mths ago
      No dilithium crystals ???
    • Loren  •  3 mths ago
      China already has a copy of everthing on those Tesla blueprints by now.
    • Sean  •  3 mths ago
      I can't believe solar power beamed to Earth isn't a global priority??!! There is a ton of info on this out there, with multiple feasible plans.
    • LyleC  •  Homer, Alaska  •  2 mths ago
      All this technology and my truck still uses gasoline!
    • Solar Child  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  3 mths ago
      Propulsion units employing some hybridization would prove to the best option as efficiencies are
      identified specific to each propulsion type and unit better options should become clearer. It appears that regardless of the main propulsion system eventually employed both RTGs and
      solar will still have a part in solar system transport.
    • Dr Woo Hoo  •  3 mths ago
      Space platforms are INCREDIBLY vulnerable. They can't hide!
    • veteran  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      no beamed power for spacecraft the further from the source less power reactors are the answer check out nerva on youtube and wiki
    • Peter Wolf  •  2 mths ago
      And with what $$ will the air force be using to do this? When the budget cutting gets done, there won't be enough left to even replace, on a one-on-one basis, the aging airplanes in the inventory. There won't even be enough to replace two old planes with one new one. This is pure fantasy.
    • CJE  •  Aspen, Colorado  •  3 mths ago
      Always preparing for war. I wonder what would happen if we prepared for peace?
    • Don  •  3 mths ago
      New Small Modular Reactors are designed specifically for electric power generation on earth. None of the current proposed designs would work without gravity. Purpose-designed reactors are required for space applications. I would dust off NERVA and do a deep dive for lessons learned before I would hang my hat on spinnoff technology from today's SMR designs.
    • Jeffery  •  Quincy, Illinois  •  2 mths ago
      Air Force: "We need to put a hundred nuclear reactors in orbit; of course, they'll never come down, and none will ever blow up on liftoff."
      American people: "Duh- OK; whatever you need to do- this won't interfere with my cable reception, will it?"
      Back in the 50s when everyone was "nuclearizing", the Air Force, not about to be outdone by the Navy, came up with a great idea: a nuclear-powered bomber. Advantage? It could stay aloft without refueling, virtually indefinitely. Disadvantage? The lead shielding required to protect the crew would be so heavy that it couldn't fly. Solution? Have "volunteer" flight crews composed of unmarried men or widowers who had no desire to have any more children, and do away with the shielding.
    • Gracie  •  Portland, Oregon  •  2 mths ago
      electric thrusters. called ionic propulsion. two grids of fine filament wire catiwumpus to each other (perpendicular for you ignorant, heh, heh) one with a neg. charge, the other positive. the ions move from the neg. to and thru the pos causing thrust. no moving parts, just high voltage. a kid can make 'em out of an old neon sign step-up transformer. this experiment comes just before the one where you burn your eyelashes and eyebrows off from too much black powder. we got a switchin that time.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]