The Cutline
  • George H.W. Bush turned 88 on Tuesday, and the former president teared up during an interview with his granddaughter, "Today" show contributor Jenna Bush Hager, broadcast on the NBC morning show.

    "I never thought I'd get this part in chronology," the elder Bush said in the interview, taped over the weekend in Kennebunkport, Maine.

    "What's aging like?" Jenna Bush asked her grandfather.

    "Aging is all right," Bush replied. "Better than the alternative, not being here."

    The one-term president said it was a "terrible, awful feeling" to lose to Bill Clinton in the 1992 presidential election.

    [Slideshow: Portrait unveiling for George W. Bush]

    "I really wanted to win and worked hard," Bush said. "Later on, people said, 'Well, he didn't really care,' which is crazy. I worked my heart out."

    The tears came when Bush 41 shared a letter he had written to the family reflecting on his life:

    Read More »from George H.W. Bush tears up during birthday interview with Jenna on ‘Today’
  • Bernstein and Woodward in the Washington Post newsroom in 1973. (AP)

    Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, arguably the two most famous newspaper reporters in American history, did something on Sunday they haven't done in 36 years: They shared a byline in the Washington Post.

    Woodward and Bernstein, who are on a mini-publicity tour surrounding the 40th anniversary of the Watergate break-ins, published a joint opinion essay for the Post's Outlook section about what they've learned since first reporting on the scandal: President Richard Nixon, who was forced to resign in the wake of Watergate, was "far worse than we thought."

    "The Watergate that we wrote about in The Washington Post from 1972 to 1974 is not Watergate as we know it today," they wrote. "It was only a glimpse into something far worse."

    Today, much more than when we first covered this story as young Washington Post reporters, an abundant record provides unambiguous answers and evidence about Watergate and its meaning. This record has expanded continuously over the decades with the transcription of hundreds of hours of Nixon's secret tapes, adding detail and context to the hearings in the Senate and House of Representatives; the trials and guilty pleas of some 40 Nixon aides and associates who went to jail; and the memoirs of Nixon and his deputies. Such documentation makes it possible to trace the president's personal dominance over a massive campaign of political espionage, sabotage and other illegal activities against his real or perceived opponents.

    So what did Watergate mean? To Woodward and Bernstein, it was "Nixon's five wars":

    In the course of his five-and-a-half-year presidency, beginning in 1969, Nixon launched and managed five successive and overlapping wars--against the anti-Vietnam War movement, the news media, the Democrats, the justice system and, finally, against history itself. All reflected a mind-set and a pattern of behavior that were uniquely and pervasively Nixon's: a willingness to disregard the law for political advantage, and a quest for dirt and secrets about his opponents as an organizing principle of his presidency.

    Long before the Watergate break-in, gumshoeing, burglary, wiretapping and political sabotage had become a way of life in the Nixon White House.

    [Also read: Love letters reveal Nixon's sensitive side]

    On CBS' "Face The Nation" on Sunday, Bernstein said that the op-ed was, in part, an effort to put to rest the notion that the Nixon administration's cover-up of the Watergate scandal was worse that the crime.

    "The crimes were enormous, and that's what the tapes show," Bernstein said. "But what we found is, his White House became to a remarkable extent a criminal enterprise such as we've never had in our history."

    Read More »from Woodward and Bernstein share first Washington Post byline in 36 years
  • (

    Twitter announced on Wednesday that it has eliminated all text, bubbled typefaces and the lowercase "t" versions of the company's logos, unveiling a simplified silhouette of "Larry," the bird (inspired by NBA Hall-of-Famer Larry Bird) that has long served as its symbol.

    "From now on, this bird will be the universally recognizable symbol of Twitter," Doug Bowman, Twitter's creative director, wrote in a post on the company's blog. "Twitter is the bird, the bird is Twitter."

    Bowman continued:

    Our new bird grows out of love for ornithology, design within creative constraints, and simple geometry. This bird is crafted purely from three sets of overlapping circles--similar to how your networks, interests and ideas connect and intersect with peers and friends. Whether soaring high above the earth to take in a broad view, or flocking with other birds to achieve a common purpose, a bird in flight is the ultimate representation of freedom, hope and limitless possibility.

    The six-year-old social

    Read More »from Twitter changes logo to a simplified bird


(1,891 Stories)

Follow Yahoo! News