Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Puck Daddy

    139214282So the Boston Bruins are in a bit of a funk.

    Marek tracked it back to Tim Thomas's White House/Facebook/Free Citizen rant on today's podcast, but their 4-7-0 mark since then could be coincidental.

    More to the point, as Sarah Connors notes on Stanley Cup of Chowder: The losses of Nathan Horton and Rich Peverley to injury have really made a mess of things offensively, to the point where a trade might be a necessity.

    But up first: Dramatic lineup changes!

    Joe Haggerty of CSNNE reports that the shift of center David Krejci over to the right wing on a line with Milan Lucic and center Chris Kelly — which Claude Julien unveiled during the B's loss to Niklas Backstrom and the Minnesota Wild on Sunday — could stick.

    From Haggerty:

    Krejci snapped out of his scoreless February with a goal in Boston's shootout win over the Canadiens, but the pivot was certainly open to the change after managing just one point and a minus-8 in nine games this month.

    Krejci was also struggling mightily with five face-off wins in 16 tries against the Wild, so shifting Kelly to center allowed the Czech Republic playmaker to concentrate a little more on the offensive side of the puck. "We had some chances. [Kelly] is a great player and he does a lot of the little things right. I don't usually play the right wing, but I thought we played in their zone a lot," said Krejci. "We had some good chances, but we need to find a way to score."

    Haggerty notes that the Bruins have "averaged 1.8 goals per game in the 11 games since Nathan Horton went down with a concussion."

    It's an injury that's directly affected Krejci's slump and, in turn, this potential lineup change.

    So do the Bruins need a big trade or to just wait out the injuries, asks Amanda Bruno or MassLive.com?

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
     

    72 comments

    • James F  •  3 mths ago
      Actually, the Bruins' slump goes back more to the Vancouver game. They haven't been very good at all since then. The injuries to Horton and Peverley hurt them big time. They don't have many guys in the AHL that can fill in at all - especially not in a top 6 role (all their good prospects are in Junior), so it's screwed everything up. That said, even with the injuries they just haven't been playing as well as they should be. They aren't really creating anything, the defense has been turning the puck over too much, and Rask and Thomas have both been letting in soft goals at very bad times. They just aren't working hard enough as a team.
      • James 3 mths ago
        Seems like the #$%$ are afraid to play their physical type game since the No Hit League neutered them, starting in that Vancouver game. What a coincidence.
      • norm peterson 3 mths ago
        Did you mean they finally started calling the hits from behind, illegal hits and cheap shots after the whistle, etc .. ?
      • Speer 3 mths ago
        Afraid to play their physical game? Or play by the rules as they are written. Shanny has stopped the ridiculous physical play that boston was so use to getting away with. Guess its hard to win when you have to play by the rules...
    • Marcus W  •  3 mths ago
      The Bruins have been getting out-worked and out-hit in every game for the past two months now. It's simple, they get out-hit = they lose. They have been playing reactive hockey for far too long now, and the injuries, yeah they are hurting them, but not as much as their work ethic is killing them. D-men look like kids playing hot potato with the puck, forwards aren't helping them out much during the breakouts either, thus turnovers a plenty. I don't know if it's the opponents looking at our breakouts on tape or what, but coaching needs to figure out something new here, cause the current plan ain't working. About making a trade, I just hope they don't over-react, and pay too much for somebody they don't need. We won the Cup last year with the same team, minus NO-MAS Kaberle, well not much of a difference between Corvo and him, other than Corvo will shoot the puck, but NO-MAS actually played a bit better D, which is really sad, because he never hit anybody, which is more than Corvo. I would love to see Seabrook in a #$%$ uniform, but I doubt it will happen. As much as I hated Denise ( the stick checking princess ) Wideman, we have been chasing our tail ever since we got rid of him, and our solutions to his vacancy still exist. Most puck moving d-men are sissies, and liabilities in the d zone. So, why again do we need one ?
      • Luke 3 mths ago
        Valid point on the physical game for the most part. When you get out hit by the Habs thats an issue. But there have been plenty of times in this slide where they have controlled play and had the forecheck running and still werent potting goals.
      • Sweet D. 3 mths ago
        it's stupid to bing in a big name d-man, corvo is just keeping hamilton's spot warm for next season
      • Marcus W 3 mths ago
        Yeah, good point about Hamilton, I keep forgetting about him. They should at least trade Corvo back to Carolina for Gleason, or maybe package him with somebody else, nobody big hopefully, and maybe try to get Ruuttu ? I was hoping that they could try to get Cole in the offseason, but he got a good contract from Montreal. I just hope that when the dust settles in about a week, that we didn't make any drastic moves, cause when there aren't many sellers, it tends to drive up the price for the buyers. The #$%$ for the most part, are the same as last year.
    • Mike M  •  Dallas, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      Hector didn't you see : David Krejci has moved from center to rightwing. Anytime Yahoo sees rightwing it is purely political....
      • Hector 3 mths ago
        Well, at least THATS an explanation...
    • MR X.  •  3 mths ago
      They have not been the same Team since they lost to the Canucks.
      • ross_doudu 3 mths ago
        As long as its not a playoff loss who cares.. Dont you have a church to go to..
      • Alvin W 3 mths ago
        @ross_doudu.....Slap Daddy isn't wrong, since the loss to the Canucks in early January, the Bruins have been averaging 3.35 goals against per game. Before that game, they were averaging 1.76 goals against. If they don't care, I'm sure the Senators wouldn't mind that they don't fix things so they can overtake them for the division lead.
      • RT 3 mths ago
        It sort of aligns, but it also aligns with some horrific calls and the target that the Bruins seem to carry from Shanaban. They're playing no more physically or aggressively than any other team, they're not as physical as they were.
    • Hector  •  3 mths ago
      Why is this under "Politics"?
      • frozone 3 mths ago
        The mention of the word "white house" perhaps
      • Hector 3 mths ago
        Unreal
      • GregoryM 3 mths ago
        Clearly the phrase "right-wing" caused it....
    • MR X.  •  3 mths ago
      It could be worse, you could be a Leafs Fan.
    • Losers in 7  •  Markham, Canada  •  3 mths ago
      Anyone know how the Habs are doing this year? Thanks
    • David  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  3 mths ago
      Last I checked Tim Thomas doesn't score goals. The 1.8 seems a better explanation for the slump. That and Charra letting a forward skate right down the middle untouched, or Dennis Seidenberg turning his back on the puck carrier AND screening Tim Thomas at the same time. Maybe they could get Wheeler back, ahahahaha.
    • Tami  •  Williamsburg, Virginia  •  3 mths ago
      great story listed under politics
    • B  •  New York, New York  •  3 mths ago
      Because as we all know, when your goaltender snubs a politician because he thinks he's a jerk, your offense dries up and your defense forgets how to play their position. It's plain as day, and has absolutely nothing to do with losing two of your top 6 forwards.
    • Losers in 7  •  Markham, Canada  •  3 mths ago
      Riotville where every newborn child receives a pack of matches and a 8x10 portrait of the stanley cup champion Boston Bruins.
    • Bradsworth  •  3 mths ago
      Remember when "everyone" was saying the Bruins were SOOOO much better than Detroit?
    • Mustache of Kes  •  3 mths ago
      Yeah Mo, that Bruins team sure did suck last night. They just plain sucked! I've seen teams suck before, but they were the suckiest bunch of sucks that ever sucked.Ah - I've gotta go, my #$%$ wiener kids are listening.
    • James F  •  3 mths ago
      It's also definitely true that the Bruins aren't quite as good as their record in November-January showed, and they aren't as bad as their recent record shows. However, they're less than one year removed from a Stanley Cup, have great young talent, and have some great prospects who could be ready next year (especially Hamilton). I see no reason for them to make a major trade to try and put them over the top next year. If there is a good, smart trade that doesn't hurt the future then I expect Chiarelli to make it, but I'd rather them pretty much stick with what they have, hope that Horton and Peverley can be their pre-playoff acquisitions in a way, and continue with the system that has set them up as potential contenders almost every year.
    • Peter  •  3 mths ago
      wonder if they're eating chicken and drinking beer in the locker room? GO BRUINS!
    • Paul  •  Toronto, Canada  •  3 mths ago
      i think the bruins aint playing well because there not playing there game
    • GOAL1234  •  Lawrence, Massachusetts  •  3 mths ago
      Krejci line is minus 5 this year, compare it to the Bergeron line which is plus 75. If hi line doesn't get going the team will be playing golf in late April.
    • Luke  •  Woburn, Massachusetts  •  3 mths ago
      This is simply an issue of line chemistry due to Peverley and Horton being out. When you look down the bench and are forced to entertain the idea of playing Benoit Pouliot on the top line, youre hurting. Its also hard to hit the back of the net when you fire 40 of your 48 shots into the chest protector of Backstrom. Not taking anything away from him cause he is a solid netminder but shot selection hasnt been the forte in this slide for the Bruins.
    • Bosshog  •  3 mths ago
      I see Ottawa won again tonight. I tell ya, a few more Ottawa wins combined with Bruin losses and the Senators will steal that division title to get the clinched playoff berth...
      Bruins would slide into 7-8th place and get bounced by the Rangers in the first round...
    • Shuvaxu  •  Hallowell, Maine  •  3 mths ago
      The Bruins ought to move an early pick and/or good prospect to land Ales Hemsky from the Oilers on a rental. His high salary wouldn't make a bit of difference next season, and he can provide some much-needed scoring on the top unit until Horton gets back (if that happens). I wouldn't mind seeing Boston land Ryan Smyth, either--he has a similar game to Horton, and might be even better in front of the net although a slower skater.

      The loss of Horton has made the top line entirely ineffective, which enables opposing teams to focus on shutting down the Bergeron line--a strategy that has been working. Having two lines that can score at will against lesser defenses is imperative--that way, when one of your top lines is shut down, you can get productivity from the other.

      The Bruins need a top 6 forward NOW, preferably a right winger and preferably one that won't cost the team a roster player. Move a high pick or a couple of mid-rounds for Hemsky or Smyth (or both), Edmonton isn't going to be in the playoffs, and both guys are in the looking at being UFAs next season. Get it done, and get it done now.

    Blog Authors / Profiles

    Blogs