Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Yes, Washington is in fact more partisan now

    Elephant and donkey holding hands, each wearing "I'm with stupid" t-shirts / Kelly SavageElephant and donkey / Kelly Savage
    Washington has never been more partisan, right? Or is that common lament simply a trick of nostalgia? A look at the numbers reveals that the problem is not, it turns out, all in our heads: over the last four decades, Congressional polarization has steadily increased.

    Since 1947, Americans for Democratic Action, a liberal advocacy group, has tracked the political positions of each Senate and House member, scoring how they voted each year on 20 key bills covering a variety of social and economic issues. (Many groups from across the political spectrum calculate lawmakers' dedication to various ideologies and causes. The Signal is merely using this group's data because it is collected over many years and is based on the controversial votes that reveal the fault lines in the House and Senate.)

    In the graph below, the colored bands indicate where the middle 50% of each party ranks on the ADA's scale. A narrower band means the heart of the party usually votes in tandem; a wider band shows that lawmakers feel a certain license to vote against the party on more occasions.
    Polarization in Congress by Sharad Goel

    As you can see, the centers of the two parties have not come close to overlapping since Ronald Reagan was president. Even if the general deviation from the party line--the width of the colored band--resembled those looser times, the overall adherence to party doctrine would prevent any overlap.

    Sharad Goel is a member of the microeconomics and social systems group at Yahoo! Research. He blogs at MessyMatters.com. Illustration by Kelly Savage.

    Other popular Yahoo! News stories:
    Politicians never 'lie'
    Romney win captivates Twitter—for 10 minutes
    Mitt Romney's February to-do list

    Want more? Visit The Signal blog or connect with us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

     
    • jim  •  Nashville, Tennessee  •  3 mths ago
      It's not just the government that is more partisan the American people are more partisan too.
      • Tom Kennen 3 mths ago
        If the media would just stay politically neutral and report the facts people could make better decisions.
      • James 3 mths ago
        That's right. There would be much less polarization without Limbaugh, Hannity and Savage reaping their fortunes from pandering to gullible and uneducated people.
      • Twenty-One 3 mths ago
        James = brainwashed lefty.
    • Jeffrey B  •  Oneonta, New York  •  3 mths ago
      This is why term limits and rules against becoming lobbyists (which they voted down yesterday), should happen. Get people in congress to serve the people not "service" them.
      • Sally 3 mths ago
        The lobbyists don't visit Ron Paul. Ron Paul 2012!
    • John Boner  •  3 mths ago
      The reason the govt is so partisan is because people have been divided by powerful interests.
      And it is really VERY easy to manipulate people.
      • WTF 3 mths ago
        yes, i could tell by your post just above....
    • WhatTheF*  •  3 mths ago
      Nice picture of these poor performing politicians.
    • Jason B  •  3 mths ago
      The terms "red state" and "blue state" were invented by the media during the 2000 election in order to create a sense of "us vs. them" divisiveness. Prior to that, each individual news network used whatever colors they felt like on their electoral college maps, and aside from a couple of REALLY obvious states (e.g. California) you didn't get that sense of "Oh, everybody from ____ always votes _____."
      • toate 3 mths ago
        The media plays a part. They're not in the news business anymore. They are entertainment. The more they can make this like a reality show the better for their ratings. Americans are so conditioned to this we play right along.
      • robert 3 mths ago
        I'm from California, Jason, and I always vote Republican--a fat lot of good that does.
      • lead pill 3 mths ago
        I hear you Robert. I still vote Republican every time though. Kevin De Leon is a all out #$%$ out to strip the 2nd amendment. Get this guy out of here at any chance.
    • Patriot Pundit  •  3 mths ago
      I think this is largely due to selfishness and a lack of patriotism. Lapel pins and sticking a flag on your porch doesn't one patriotic. Doing what's best for the country, even when you disagree with the other side's ideology, is patriotic. Refusing to do so is selfish, and cowardly. Man up, America.
      • Mike 3 mths ago
        Well said- there is WAY too many people today doing what's best for themselves
        and not what's best for America. What's really bad is that most of this is pure
        ideology; who cares what happens to the country as long as I have my own personal cause advanced?
      • Charles 3 mths ago
        You guys are describing oDUMBo to a "t" !!!!
      • libtardsuc 3 mths ago
        and which side should cave...it's divorce time
    • Opus  •  3 mths ago
      thank Newt the pillsbury playboy he started the trend and made it very ugly enter Tom Delay and Washington went from a cesspool to whatever is worse than a cesspool
    • SAM D  •  3 mths ago
      Term limits is the answer to many problems, including this one.
    • .  •  Ringwood, New Jersey  •  3 mths ago
      George Washington warned us about this....

      Two party system is a joke.
    • Carp  •  3 mths ago
      I bet the "increasing partisanship" of the 1850s would beat that!
    • Sabre Mark Six  •  3 mths ago
      Looking to one person to "save the country" - whether it's Barack Obama or Ron Paul - is a recipe for disaster.
    • cinsy  •  Charlotte, North Carolina  •  3 mths ago
      Congress has broken it's system of rules by which it operates. It needs to go back to rules that are more fair and efficient; they need to be able to better respond to the People [not corps] who they took an oath to serve.
    • Ironass  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 mths ago
      Unilaterally,eliminate eighty per cent of lobbyist capacity, evenly, across the board. Special interests have, obviously, taken over our representation since the 1970's and it has poisoned and diseased Washington, DC. Our elected officials end up, spending way too much of their (our) time, kissing up to special interests for fund raising, in order to get re-elected. The system has been rotting at the core for thirty years.
    • alloveryourface  •  Akron, Ohio  •  3 mths ago
      If it's so diverse then why do both parties continue to have the same agenda? Obama utilized all of Bushs' laws he claimed he would repeal. We know the banks own both parties equally, and the more people 'wake up' the more terrified these sleazy bankers get.
    • j  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  3 mths ago
      If we converted the government to a REAL democracy/republic instead of the CORPORATE KLEPTOCRACY we have congress could actually do it's job. Currently the only thing our elected officials worry about is pleasing the folks that bought them, so they can get more money for the next election. Our elected representatives sell themselves like prostitutes on the street corner ...... or they don't get reelected. This is the most corrupt government in the industrialized world.
    • Truthteller  •  3 mths ago
      I think we could all benefit by de-emphasizing our party affiliations (I have none at all at the moment, both sides are equally embarrassing to me) , and focus on solutions to the issues we face. And for heaven's sake, stop the namecalling, that solves nothing and convinces no one, it just perpetuates this mindless animosity.
      I'll concede that Bernanke's plan to avoid a Depression, with all the spending and debt generated, may have been necessary. But I sure hope he's got a plan, (other than just inflating our way out of it), to begin to pay down that debt. I think any rational person would conclude that we need a combination of a significant reduction in government spending, along with a reformation of the tax code to get back to the rates that prevailed in the nineties. That's job one as far as I'm concerned. Can we begin the process of getting to an agreement on how to achieve that, and in the aim of getting there, begin electing Congressional representatives that promise make it a point to reject the robotic voting along party lines, and begin voting their constituents' interest, along with honestly voting their conscience?
    • frandrea  •  3 mths ago
      Publicly financed elections. No more Grover Nordquist, Koch Bros. or George Soros.
    • Belinda  •  3 mths ago
      Seems most of them do what they do just to get re- elected.
    • Henry  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      So? Who really controls? The lobbists!! NEW person in congress or pres, THE lobby say take my ---millions of dollars and --millions of votes or your opponent will !!! SO THEY TAKE !!! The billion Obama will get HAS TO BE PAIDED BACK TO THE LOBBY. SAME FOR EACH CONGRESS PERSON. There is NO FREE LUNCH !!!!! Get rid of lobbists LOL.
    • Timmy  •  3 mths ago
      the answer is no one that is rich should be in congress or elected for president.term limits will not help either.we need to take the money out of politics period.a average american that is low or middle income should be the ones running this nation because they know how to make what little they have do them.there should be no companies involved in the policy making either and no special interst groups either.nothing will never chang in america while the rich,companies and special interst groups control the thinking of the politicans that are in office now and the ones that will be elected this year.alot are wrong about this president with what he has to say about the poor.you see he is the only one that has stood up for the poor and will win again because the repeublican party thinks the poor and middle income class are beneath them.they are so wrong on that because there are more of us than them period.we control who wins and loses in the united states not the rich republican.it does not matter how much money america is in debt because if the rich and companies would pay what they should pay towards this nations debt it could be paid in full.they will not because they want to keep their money and live off the backs of the poor and middle class.there is a time coming that we will be pushed to far and what we will do who knows but history says that we may do what our founding fathers of this nation did and take this nation back from them.

    About The Signal

    The Signal is the Yahoo! News predictions blog featuring real-time forecasts and sentiment on politics, economics, and more. MEET THE TEAM: David Pennock, David Rothschild

    Subscribe

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.

    Meet The Signal Team

    Remake America

    In 2012, Yahoo! News will tell the nation’s story through the experiences and views of real Americans like you. Watch the first Remake America video »