Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Today in Tech

    How’d they do it? NASA explains the Blue Marble photo

    Here's how you create an incredibly detailed photo of the Earth from space

    A few days ago, NASA published an incredibly detailed photo, dubbed Blue Marble, of the Earth's western hemisphere. Since then, the photo has generated over 3.1 million views on Flickr, making it one of the all-time most-viewed images on the photo-sharing site. So what did NASA do to celebrate? Not only did they upload a second photo, of the Earth's eastern hemisphere (pictured above), but they also uploaded an explanation of how they created these fabulous images.

    NASA scientist Norman Kuring created the images by combining data from six different orbits of the Suomi NPP satellite. Or putting it a different way, the satellite flew above this area of Earth six times over an eight hour time period. This was necessary because the satellite isn't far enough away from the planet to get a complete picture in one view. Kuring describes it by comparing the Earth to a basketball — if your eye is the Suomi NPP satellite, holding the basketball about five-eighths of an inch from your face will approximate the limited view that the satellite has of the planet's surface.

    The Earth's diameter is about 7,926 miles, but the Suomi NPP satellite can only capture a view about 1,865 miles wide at one time. So stitching together the data from multiple passes allowed Kuring to "step back" from the actual orbit to give us an apparent view from a distance of about 7,918 miles away, without sacrificing any of the detail of the closer view. The original Blue Marble photograph was taken by NASA astronauts abord the Apollo 17, at a distance of about 28,000 miles. Don't forget to check out the image on Flickr to see all its glorious detail!

    [Image credits: NASA/NOAA]

    (Source)

    This article was written by Katherine Gray and originally appeared on Tecca

    More from Tecca:

    We apologize. An error has occurred. Please try again.
     

    13 comments

    • Dean  •  White Marsh, Maryland  •  3 mths ago
      still waiting for a 7-11 to be up and running in orbit.
      • Dean 3 mths ago
        basically im not going up there with out snacks.
    • Ryan  •  Phoenix, Arizona  •  3 mths ago
      no, but it should be much more privatized.
    • Tyler  •  3 mths ago
      We need to devote more money to NASA. We can start by cutting social parasites off of their handouts to pay for it.
      • Jeff 3 mths ago
        Or raising your taxes? Not everyone else's... just yours.
      • TH 3 mths ago
        Including corporate parasites I assume.
      • GeorgeS 3 mths ago
        You mean people who don't pay their full share of taxes? Like Mitt Romney?
    • Tidbit  •  3 mths ago
      My Hovercraft is full of eels...
    • True  •  Brunswick, Maine  •  3 mths ago
      nasa is a total waste of money---it must be shut down
      • A Yahoo! User 3 mths ago
        your a waste of flesh....
      • Cookieman 3 mths ago
        the only waste of money was the amount that we paid teachers to try an educate you!
      • c 3 mths ago
        Unfortunately it is a money pit, that is why they are stopping apollo missions. but hey if we stop the war on drugs we will have enough money easily im sure.
    • JohnW  •  3 mths ago
      And I thought they just stole the picture from Google earth.
    • Micah  •  Plano, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      i guess i missed this one!
    • LilMissCantBeWrong  •  3 mths ago
      What I don't understand is: if they had to make six passes, why do the clouds look like it was taken with 1 shot? Also, wouldn't the lighting be different? I don't get it :(
    • Fu Man Jew  •  Milwaukee, Wisconsin  •  3 mths ago
      I don't get it
    • Patrick  •  3 mths ago
      And if they charged 19.95 per person then they wouldn't need so much tax money??
    • Maverick  •  3 mths ago
      Why not use a satellite in higher orbit and catch it all in one shot? Or am I missing something here?
      • Goose 3 mths ago
        If the satellite was higher the resolution wouldn't be as good.
    • Breadman  •  3 mths ago
      So....
    • True  •  Brunswick, Maine  •  3 mths ago
      nasa serves no purpose but to waste money---shut it down now

    Blogs