Casey Anthony Jurors' Names Should Not Be Released

How did Jennifer Ford's name get out? Oh yeah she did an interview. I agree not to let the names out but the money hungry jurors will reveal themselves anyway!

Ms. Sicilia-the writer of this column-is another one who just isn't fit to address the public; she isn't capable of facing the truth whatever it happens to be. She would hide the identities of the jurors no different than the jurors hid from their primary duty to their fellow Americans..to ferret out justice for caylee's sake. They want to hide from their failure to see justice done. They utterly failed to act as a jury was intended to. Under the spirit of equal rights and equal protection...we know who casey is...and since these are casey's 'peer's...we have a right to know who they are. We have a right to hold them accountable for their lack of humanity in assigning fault in this case. They cannot commit such an injustice and expect to remain anonymous.

So if Bill O'Reilly releases a map of the jurors' neighborhoods with little target symbols on their homes and they end up shot or firebombed, can he claim they were surveyor's marks???

You were not setting the jury how would you know if the jury was wrong? All you got was the news reporter on tv you didn't set for eight weeks day in and day out listening to the people on the stand like they did. You peole make me sick cutting down the jury like you doing and never being in the court room. How do you know if she was guilt or not guilt by the news reports. You say by the way she acted have you lose a child or a close love one like that it take months and years to get back to normal even if you get back to normal a lot of us don't get back to normal. So judge not if you have never walk in any one shoes like that.

Somebody on that jury should have had the guts to stand up to whoever took control in there to make the verdict so quick. All it would have taken was one person to hang the jury.
They let Caylee down.

The price for living in a democracy,take ownership for your decisions.

I don't agree with the jury's decision, but then again, I wasn't on the jury to know what they heard or didn't hear. And I wish I could smack that smile off Casey's face! BUT I do NOT think they should release the jurors' names. IF they choose to come forward and talk then okay. If not, then okay. Leave them alone, you crazy NEWS people!!

Think about it: do you really need their names and even if you had their names, what the heck would you do and why turn the morons into instant reality stars. Isn't it bad enough we're going to see a reality show, a bunch of bookds, interviews, moves and made for tv shows from a baby killer whof fooled the system, went free and now stands to live the life she was determined to have: Bella Vita. Casey forgot about Karma though.Let's be good 2 oneanother.

It should be made public. It's a public trial, a jury is made up of casey anthony's peers. This is all public and if you serve on a jury, your name should NOT be withheld for fear of retaliation. There is no excuse for this, the jury made a bad decision, or something else happened behind the scenes that we didnt' know about and THAT is why the jury is scared. Why be scared about something if you know you've done nothing wrong? It's because they know that they did the wrong thing and let a crazy psychopath go...They weren't ashamed of their decision when they made it, why shoudl they be afraid or ashamed of their decision now?

you are wrong, this is a jury of our peers and public judgements should be public including those who sit in judgement. Now, it doesn't give the right for people to hurt people, like Casey Anthony alledgedly did to her child. But the judicial system must be open.

I believe that if the jury members want their names out there then it is their decision but the should know that most of America is mad at them and they should be prepared for the ridicule and disrespect that comes with it.

For those who say there wasn't enough evidence tell me why after viewing over 346 pieces of physical forensics and hundreds of testimony you concluded it is wiser to believe the lies set forth from a client that even her defense attorney said she was a liar. You had NO evidence presented to substantiate shocking claims on opening (ps: never heard any more either). The 2nd pt is: Reasonable doubt often involves some common sense to connect it together. Reasonable doubt does not translate to no doubt. Logically, some doubt will Always remain. Reasonable means use your brain and any sense of logic. I've served on Many trials and never have seen jurors who didn't ask questions or review evidence. I got yur number.

that %%#%# shouldnt get release its very unfair when they giving these $###$# life and $#$% and prison for selling drugs when the economy is bad u gotta get money some kind of way hello no jobs so u mean to tell me it took her 30days to call da cops wow.... I MEAN ITS NOT RIGHT WHEN SOME PEOPLE CANT HAVE KIDS IN SOME OF THE ONES WHO DO DONT APPRECIATE THEM...

As a runny away in a big city, a bad person told me to inhale cloaform, I did it, I passed out and fell off a pourch.If Caylee had her mouth coverd with a cloaform soaked patch,she would pass out and die.

This jury are losers... In the Scott Peteson's case there was less forensics and the jury took one week to go through the evidence. This jury eleven hours. Pathetic

I agree with BigRoy that their names should be released. They have to own up to their decision. I don't think they gave the case any thought at all. Not one piece of evidence was asked to be seen.

I don't care what any legal person say's the JURY was wrong. If u lie bout one thing u lie bout everything,If u love ur child ur not going to wait 30 days to call the cops..

By the way for all the young mothers that wants to live LA VIDA LOCA) and enjoy sex and have babies at early age ---IT IS NOT LEGAL TO SEDATE UR BABIES WITH CHOLOFORM ..IS A CRIME

Casey's father said that it was an accident which spun out of control. She didn't mean to kill her, but she was using chloroform to sedate her so she could party. The car smelled like it because while the body was decomposing the chloroform was seeping out of her pores. I don't think her mother knew until the end when she learned she tried to make it sound as if she had looked it up. The jury discounted the chloroform as not important.

The prosecution dropped the ball plain and simple. They were too arrogant to give the jury option B or C. It was Murder One or nothing at all, and with all the holes in the case, there wasn't enough hard evidence to convict on a Capital crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Reminds me of "My Cousin Vini" , in that a supposedly second class defense attorney makes the prosecutor look like a putz. All they had was enough evidence to convict on manslaughter; but, they got greedy, rolled the dice and lost. Don't blame the jury...they did their job given the case the prosecution delivered.to them. Tough job and I'm satisfied they found her not guilty which isn't the same as innocent. She was found to be not guilty of the crime the prosecution alleged. Remember freedom lovers, we don't have to prove ourselves innocent in a court of law...the prosecution has to prover we're guilty of the charges they file. This isn't Taliban country!