Clarence Thomas Asked His First Question in 10 Years to Challenge a Gun Rights Issue
As interpreters of the United States Constitution, it is the job of Supreme Court justices to be vocal about their thoughts. Justice Clarence Thomas, however, has kept famously mum about his — for the last decade.
On Monday, the justice broke his silence to ask multiple questions during a death penalty which raised questions about the Second Amendment rights of a person convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence. Thomas, who has been called SCOTUS' most conservative justice, piped up during oral arguments when attorney and U.S. Assistant to the Solicitor General Ilana Eisenstein, asked for further questions.
According to BuzzFeed, he said, "Ms. Eisenstein, one question: This is a misdemeanor violation. It suspends a constitutional right. Can you give me another example where a misdemeanor suspends a constitutional right?"
What followed was a five-minute dialogue between the justice and the attorney. Einstein noted that studies show perpetrators of domestic violence are six times as likely to kill family members using a gun. But with his final question, Thomas suggested the court may have a better case were they discussing a gun crime instead.
According to Gawker, Thomas hadn't been altogether speechless for the last 10 years: In 2013, he ended what was then a sabbatical-long silence to take a jab at Yale University, his alma mater.
In 2014, the New Yorker's Jeffrey Toobin wrote a scathing portrait of Thomas, calling his demeanor on the job "downright embarrassing." Wrote Toobin:
These days, Thomas only reclines; his leather chair is pitched so that he can stare at the ceiling, which he does at length. He strokes his chin. His eyelids look heavy. Every schoolteacher knows this look. It's called "not paying attention."
The moment, which drew audible gasps, also prompted a flurry of tweets, with some users dismayed at the issue that prompted Thomas to find his voice, and others poking fun at the timing.
WTF Clarence Thomas speaks from the bench for the first time in ten years and he says "Damn Daniel?" #unprofessional
Shut up, @clarencethomas.
The death of Scalia having freed him from the Imperious Curse, Clarence Thomas asked a question to a lawyer today.
Maybe Clarence Thomas can only speak on leap days
Clarence Thomas really only asks questions once every ten Black History Months like he has some type of quota to fill.
Clarence Thomas questioned logic of keeping guns from domestic abusers. We've got questions he should've asked. #Questions4Clarence
Clarence Thomas's first words from the bench in 10 years were about defending gun rights for domestic abusers. http://huff.to/21wsROI
Clarence Thomas spoke? Was he actual a ventriloquist asking through Scalia all these years?
Clarence Thomas asking his first question in 10 years just proves how shitty a justice he is. The man is a walking rubber stamp. #SCOTUS
Clarence Thomas interrupted his 10-year silence to remind U.S. voters to allow a Democrat to pick the next SCOTUS justice, for God's sake
I see Clarence Thomas just realized he didn't cease to exist when Scalia died
Thomas has endured in the collective memory as being perennially tight-lipped, inspiring even one Lorelai Gilmore to remark at one point, "For months, I've been sulking around, not saying anything, not having an opinion on anything like I'm Clarence Thomas or something."
Look who's talking now.