Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Climate change: Will chocolate become a costly luxury?

    If temperatures continue to rise, a new report suggests, West Africa, source of half the world's chocolate, will be unfit to grow the coveted beans

    Is the world's cocoa supply in danger? That's what a new study from the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) suggests, singling out a familiar culprit: Global warming. The findings [see PDF] reveal that annual temperature increases will hamper the crop-production efforts in West Africa, which currently supplies half of the world's chocolate  at least if preventive measures aren't taken. Here's what you should know:

    How hot are we talking?
    The study, which consulted 19 climate-change models, indicates that a mere two degrees Celcius increase by 2050 will render areas like Ghana and the Ivory Coast too hot to grow cocoa, says The Washington Post. As cocoa trees struggle to obtain enough water, the developmental stages of cocoa pods that house "the prized cocoa bean" — source of the chocolate we know and love — would be disturbed. The effects of a shortage — including a leap in the price of chocolate — could be felt as soon as 2030.  

    Well, why not just move the cocoa trees elsewhere?
    Rachel Cernansky of TreeHugger
    points out that "the ideal conditions for cocoa-growing will shift to higher altitudes — but most of West Africa is relatively flat, so there is not a lot of land at higher elevation to move to." Plus, clearing forests to pave way for farmland may actually end up "exacerbating climate change even further." 

    How would a shortage affect the region?
    The cocoa trees play an "absolutely critical role" in the region's rural life, says CIAT's Dr. Peter Läderach, who authored the study. Hundreds of thousands of smallholder farmers use "their cocoa trees like ATM machines," he says. "They pick some pods and sell them to quickly raise cash for school fees or medical expenses."

    What kind of preventive measures can be taken?
    Farmers could diversify their crops to "spread the risk" and avoid being overly dependent on cocoa, notes TreeHugger's Cernansky. Other solutions include using shady trees to cool growing areas and developing irrigation systems that aren't exclusively weather-dependent. 

    Sources: CIATReutersTreeHuggerWashington Post

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    95 comments

    • DJ  •  7 mths ago
      Chocolate has always been a luxury in most cultures and may be again. So what, We will adapt. I believe the trees grow like crazy in South America where they have no drought problem at the moment. If the rain leaves one place, It falls in another. Its natures way. Do something else for a while.
    • MatthewS  •  7 mths ago
      The real fun one is coffee. Western society might survive without chocolate, but once the coffee plants dry up, expect very grumpy riots.
    • David A  •  7 mths ago
      I think my girlfriend is about to become an environmentalist!
    • David  •  7 mths ago
      On what some people are trying to live on, chocolate already IS a luxury.
    • Deathly Wraith  •  7 mths ago
      Soylent Green, anyone?
    • ruth  •  7 mths ago
      Well, I'm going right out and buying all the Hershey bars, kisses, tootsie rolls, chocolate covered nuts, raisins, creams, etc. etc. I can find !!!!!!!
    • Broke in Michigan  •  7 mths ago
      NO chocolate??? Its the end of the world as we know it!!
    • Agapito  •  7 mths ago
      thats bad news for africa, but cocoa trees can be planted further north. The sooner threat is from globalization and the rubber tree in south east asia. A fungus from South American could wipe out the entire plantations there since they grow so close together.
    • JR  •  7 mths ago
      Ok. Now there are issues. All of us chocaholics are willing to go to war and fight for our chocolate. Somebody show me who I need to kill to keep my chocolate fix.
      • VoteNixonshead2012 7 mths ago
        hahaha, The Chocolate wars. Sign me up.
      • Gman 7 mths ago
        JR, I have a better solution. If you're starting a family, have two children or less. Overpopulation is the root cause of global warming. Quality versus quantity.
      • Progressivesareusers 7 mths ago
        Start with the climate changers , then move on to the liberals !
    • BEANS  •  7 mths ago
      There are lots of other things we can give up, but not Chocolate, save the BEANS
    • A Yahoo! User  •  7 mths ago
      Other areas will become suitable for growing Chocolate... and West Africa will find another cash crop.
    • Thomas M  •  7 mths ago
      Adaptation fools, adaptation.
      • Gary 7 mths ago
        Or extinction.
      • geniusandinsanitywalkdown ... 7 mths ago
        Those that adapt will survive and those that dont, well, they live in Africa and always have their hands out asking for stuff
      • geniusandinsanitywalkdown ... 7 mths ago
        The whiners dont know how to adapt and those who know how to adapt dont whine about this stuff
    • L  •  7 mths ago
      Well, meat has become a luxury for my family. Why not chocolate?
    • william 1  •  7 mths ago
      And you think thing are bad now , just wait until theres no chocolate around to keep people calm.
    • Jon  •  7 mths ago
      I know that there is no such thing as global warming because Rush tells me to believe that global warming is a hoax.
      • rusty 7 mths ago
        Thats right and don't you forget it
      • geniusandinsanitywalkdown ... 7 mths ago
        It is about to become winter (the time when they stop calling it global warming), so soon we wil have to call it climate change (cuz we are about to see both colder than normal temps and warmer than normal temps)........And if you knew what was normal, you could predict the weather perfectly and if your climate models were so good #$%$ to tell you the weather in 50 years, could you please tell me your weather in two weeks time?
    • Rusty57  •  7 mths ago
      We'd be worried if we saw any warming outside of the climate models.
      • MatthewS 7 mths ago
        How about the steady increase of global temperatures?
    • e w  •  7 mths ago
      At the rate that our politicians are taking our money, water will soon be a luxury.
    • short skirt  •  7 mths ago
      Let's grow the beans in North Dakota and Canada. Americans are very adept at changing and very good at improving agriculture products.
    • Cricket  •  7 mths ago
      There is no sound scientific basis for predicting future climate change with any degree of certainty.There are to many variables to consider.

      Exosphere,Thermospere,Mesosphere,Stratosphere,Troposphere,Ozone Layer,Ionosphere,PlanetaryBoundryLayer,Pressure,Density&Mass,WaterVapor,Scattering,Absorption,Emissions,Refractive Index,Circulation of air,Circulation of Water,Evolution of Earths Atmosphere,Air Pollution,Solar Radiation,Solar Winds,Sun Spots,Volcanic Activity,Position of Earth to Sun,Position of Moon to Earth,Position of Earth in Galaxy,Position of Galaxy in Universe,Nitrogen,Oxygen,Argon,Carbon Dioxide,Neon,Helium,Methane,Krypton(No not Supermans Home Planet),Hydrogen,Nitrous Oxide,Carbon Monoxide,Xenon,Ozone,Nitrogen Dioxide,iodine,ammonia, etc etc etc etc etc..on and on and on..Many of these variables are constantly changing.

      Quite simply, there are SO many variables to the weather that even our
      current technology yields no better results than an educated guess,
      especially five days and beyond in advance.

      If they can't predict the weather accuratly within a week, How do you expect them to know what will happen in 5,10,20,30,40,50, years?
    • teachacreacha  •  7 mths ago
      I'd be willing to pay higher prices for dark chocolate. It's worth it!