Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Debt talks and tax cuts: Save young Americans from slavery

    Young Americans like me can't 'win the future' saddled with debt. But there's a formula that works. Reagan cut taxes and the US saw economic growth, lower unemployment, and higher revenues. Let's do that again.

    If Americans think they’ve left all forms of slavery and tyranny in our past, they should consider this: By 2020, the interest payments alone on national debt will equal approximately $5,500 per taxpayer. Americans may never again face kings or slave drivers, but in our not-so-distant future we face fiscal enslavement to our government.

    Instead of battling illegal immigration, our government might have to stop future citizens from fleeing the country to escape paying their share of our nation’s massive debt. As annual interest payments on this debt increase, the less our government can do for us (through services) and the more we have to do for the government (through taxes).

    This form of servitude is an unacceptable burden to place on the same young people we expect to “win the future.”

    OTHER VIEWS: Federal budget mess: Six ways to fix it

    The growing consensus among Washington elites (if not among political leaders) is that in order to preempt a debt crisis, we need to cut spending and raise taxes on the “rich.”

    Well, they’re half right. Government spending – especially on Medicare and the other entitlements – must be drastically trimmed, but raising taxes on corporations and people in the highest income tax bracket, many of whom are employers and investors, will only exacerbate the debt crisis and further undermine job prospects for young Americans.

    More taxes, means fewer jobs for youth

    When employers face higher expenses or less revenue, one of the first places they cut are the nonessential and entry-level positions held mainly by young people. That’s why youth unemployment historically rises faster than normal unemployment during a recession – exactly what’s happening now in our current economy.

    The Huffington Post reports that this year up to 85 percent of college graduates will be forced to live with their parents because they can’t find sufficient work. For those who are lucky enough to find work, the median salary for 2009 and 2010 grads is $27,000 compared to $30,000 for those who graduated between 2006 and 2008.

    The big-spending, big-deficit policies aimed at saving and stimulating the economy obviously aren’t helping young people find jobs, and they certainly aren’t lowering the nation’s debt. If we increase business expenses through taxes, employers are likely to cut even more jobs for young people.

    Instead of taking a little from the “rich,” we end up taking a lot from young citizens striving to achieve the American Dream.

    Not only are tax hikes for the rich and corporations likely to make employment prospects worse for America’s youth, they're also likely to bring in less revenue for the government in the long run. If tax hikes drive up unemployment, government revenue is likely to go down – not up – as more citizens end up needing to draw on, not pay into, government services.

    Skeptical? Look no further than Europe.

    Europe's record of failure on tax-hike austerity

    In response to growing debts, welfare-heavy countries across the European Union (EU) are implementing what conventional economists call “austerity.” This approach, similar to the theory advanced by the Obama administration, is that spending cuts need to be matched with big tax increases on businesses and the wealthy.

    This tactic is failing miserably. In countries like Portugal, Greece, and Spain, governments have tried tax-hike austerity, and in all four countries, the unemployment rate has gone up and tax revenues have gone down.

    In Greece, the pro-austerity economists in the Greek government and EU authorities fell significantly short of meeting their 2010 deficit projections. The Wall Street Journal reported that this spring that, “[l]ower-than-expected government revenue was the main culprit behind the higher deficit number.”

    Europe is learning the hard way that raising taxes on the wealthy during economic crises kills economic growth and incentivizes tax evasion – making the debt crisis even worse. America should learn from Europe’s mistakes and take raising taxes off the table.

    In fact, America needs tax cuts to enable employers to add jobs (especially for young people), stimulate investment, and jump-start the country’s revenue engine.

    Cutting taxes works. Look at US history.

    Cutting taxes in an economic downturn works. The last four presidents to cut taxes in response to a recession – Presidents George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan, John F. Kennedy, and Calvin Coolidge – saw economic growth, lower unemployment, and higher revenues during the four years following the cuts.

    In contrast, the last three presidents to raise taxes on the wealthy during economic troubles – George H. W. Bush, Herbert Hoover, and Franklin Roosevelt – saw the country spiral into recessions (or a depression in Hoover’s case) after their tax hikes.

    On Aug. 13, Young America’s Foundation will celebrate the 30th anniversary of President Reagan signing the largest tax cut in American history into law at the location where he signed the bill, Rancho Del Cielo in Santa Barbara, Calif. Young people could find newfound reason for celebration if our policy leaders in Washington would learn from Reagan’s accomplishments.

    After the Reagan cuts, America experienced its longest sustained period of economic growth ever, and youth unemployment (ages 16 to 24) dropped nearly five points in four years (1982 to 1986). And, even though deficits rose because of defense and domestic entitlement spending, revenues increased.

    RELATED: Reagan's 100th birthday: 10 defining moments

    To cut the deficit, our leaders can use what worked for Reagan. He cut taxes for employers during tough economic times (though he raised payroll taxes during more prosperous times) and trimmed where spending grew (domestic entitlements and defense spending). With this formula, America can both spur revenues and cut spending – all while growing the economy.

    America’s leaders can choose to follow Hoover and Europe into an economic abyss, or they can find the youthful courage to buck conventional thought and embrace what’s worked for the last 100 years. We need tax cuts to free America’s young people from joblessness and the shackles of our growing debt.

    Ron Meyer is a program officer for Young America’s Foundation (YAF). YAF introduces young people to conservatism through lectures and conferences across the country, and owns the Reagan Ranch in Santa Barbara, Calif. Ron has appeared on Fox News and been published in The Christian Science Monitor, Yahoo! News, AOL News, Human Events, and the Daily Caller.

     

    186 comments

    • Bill S  •  9 mths ago
      $5500 per taxpayer? Too bad that between 47 & 51% of Americans PAY NO TAXES!! So go ahead and recalculate that figure there, genius!
      Unfortunately, we have allowed the slackers to continue to vote on what our taxes pay! Our great country is doomed unless the sanity is restored, and soon!!
    • Dom  •  10 mths ago
      Here we are – 14 trillion dollars in debt and borrowing 40 cents of every dollar we spend. Everyone says taxes are too high already and they want “leaner” government. And everyone, including posters here, has their bogeyman. Stop illegal immigration (but leave my gardener or nanny alone). Rein in health care costs (but hands off my Medicare!). Cut military expenses (but don’t close the base in my district). Cut farm subsidies (unless you’re a farmer, or in a business that depends on agriculture). Cut oil subsidies (unless you’re an oilman, or in a business that depends on the oil industry). Tax the rich (defined as anyone making more than me).

      Don’t raise MY taxes! Don’t cut MY programs! It’s not MY fault – it’s THEIR fault (whoever “they” are)! Well you can point your finger wherever you like, including your middle finger straight up in the air. The fact is we have met the enemy, and he is us – all of us.
      How about you – are you the direct or indirect recipient of some government program or largesse? Is the government subsidizing your housing via home mortgage deduction? Do you run or work in a business that relies on a military base nearby for customers? Do you or your parents rely on Medicaid or Medicare? Did you go to school on a subsidized grant or loan? Do you receive social security payments in excess of your contributions? On and on it goes. BTW, I'm pretty well off. I make over 300K a year as an executive for a drug company and I pay 6-figure tax bills. Do I rely on government to "support" me? At first blush, no: I do not see myself as a "consumer" of government programs – if anything, I am an underwriter of them via my high taxes. But when I look below the surface, I must admit that if Medicare wasn't subsidizing the cost drugs for many people, my company wouldn't be selling nearly as much -- and I might not have this job.

      We are ALL directly or indirectly (and sometimes even without knowing) demanding more form our government than we are willing to pay for. And while we all support "generic" reductions in government spending, we are all opposed when those cuts affect us. But the facts on the ground don’t change: Either we tax ourselves more to pay for programs or we cut the programs to be commensurate with what we are willing to pay (or both). There is no free lunch – on either side of the political aisle. The entire debt ceiling charade is inane. We are not talking about paying off our existing $14 trillion debt – we are talking about how much MORE to borrow. Even a balanced budget is not going to do the trick – we still have to pay off the gigantic debt WE ALREADY OWE! Sorry Democrats: That means draconian cuts in spending on social programs and entitlements. Sorry Republicans: That means major cuts to defense and military AND tax increases – on everyone. If we are really serious about saving our kids from financial slavery, THAT is what is necessary.
      • Rick 10 mths ago
        Not everyone thinks that taxes are too high, in particualr the real rates that corporations and the wealthy pay. The rates may be too high, but that's debatable, but the loopholes, subsidies, and corporate welfare are, IMO, the real problem on the revenue (which includes tax-code spending) side of the equation.
      • Dom 10 mths ago
        Its not that simple Rick. Many, if not most, of these "loopholes" were put there for an ostensibly good reason. They are consequences of government attempts to influence private and corporate behavior via the tax code. Why, for example, are capital gains taxes lower than ordinary income? Because the government wants to promote "investment" -- which is believed to contribute to general propsperity. Why is there a tax deduction for home mortgages (but not rent)? Because the government believes that home ownership leads to a citizenry that is invested in their neighborhoods. Why is there a tax subsidy for oil exploration? Obviously, because the government wanted to encourage such exploration even during times when oil is cheap and companies have no other incentive to do so.

        They may even be right about all these things and the unintended consequences of removing "loopholes" may wind up a net negative for society as a whole.
      • Skeptic 10 mths ago
        Just to reiterate your excellent points, the word "loophole" implies an unintended way of avoiding taxes, where in reality, as you point out, these are deductions and credits put in place intentionally. The recent idea to limit the rate at which deductions impact taxes could be a step in the right direction, in that it would benefit middle class taxpayers proportionally more than those in the top tax bracket(s).
    • sallie  •  10 mths ago
      Most large corporations have done away with retirements and pensions. Not to mention health care plans. Why, as one of the largest corporations, have the politicians not done away with their own retirements, perks, and health care in an effort to raise the "profit" level of the United States Corporation? That, in my opinion, would be a start to proving they give a darn about the nations debt or our children being burdened with debt. Oh, sorry! That would get into their pockets rather than ours!
      • avg.citizen 10 mths ago
        Agree. 80% of all legislation is special interest. Some politicians even have family members working as lobbyists. When asked who they think they serve, they say special interest. They get to legislate and mandate their own pay, retirements, and pensions, on top of all the loopholes and breaks they give their own businesses. They will never do anything to hurt themselves.
    • Angry Bird  •  10 mths ago
      The reality is, BOTH parties got us where we are today, and EVERYONE is going to pay more for the excesses of the past, and get less. Ugly but true.
    • BobbyM  •  10 mths ago
      My shopping experience at a Walmart store was like shopping in a foreign store; there was hardly an item made in the USA! High end clothes stores are selling merchandise made in China. High end, low end stuff, all made in China! What is the difference? An extra bag of rice at the end of the day for the workers? What do they sell in China, Mexico, or whoever, that is made in the USA? Probably our beloved $$$'s. Bring all these jobs home to America and our debt crisis will be over by 2020, if not sooner. Next year's vote for president, and government, is going to be a selective choice for everyone. Think, think, think, before you check that box on the ballot slip. If we're going to pay higher taxes then we'd be better off paying higher prices for American made goods! Don't need a math degree to figure that one out. We need an ultra-strong leadership to say, "Americans, start lining up for jobs, there is enough for everyone!" Talk to your congressman, senator, and ask them if they're going to stop sending work overseas and bring it home where it belongs? Otherwise we're going to start eating bags of rice to survive!!
      • Gandhi 10 mths ago
        Mmmmmm. Rice.
      • Dom 10 mths ago
        I have to laugh. Want to promote "made in America"? Then be willing to pay MORE for the same items -- because until Chinese wages catch up with American labor costs, goods made in China will always cost less than the same goods made here. In other words, stop shopping at places like Wal-Mart!
      • Timmay 10 mths ago
        Don't like it? Don't shop at Walmart. If enough people vote that way with their wallets, things will change.
    • vicki  •  10 mths ago
      This "don't tax the rich so they'll generate jobs" sell may have held some water back when we were buying American, and producing American. But, even the dimmest among us know where the jobs are going, this day and age. And it's not to Americans.
      • mik 10 mths ago
        Want someone to blame, how about Bill Clintons NAFTA and trade unions for pricing the American worker out of competition.
    • Hewhoo  •  10 mths ago
      Eliminate tax breaks for the companies who elect to keep their dollars and jobs overseas. Give the breaks to those who employ Americans and reinvest on our shores. Also, establish a policy of fair trade not free trade. We always get suckered when we engage in the latter.
    • jim  •  10 mths ago
      Our federal government has kept us in slavery for decades.The wealthy not paying thier share and the middle and lower classes carrying the tax burden.Now that at least 10% of the working class in unemployed perminantly.The wealthy will have to pay.
      • JoeM 10 mths ago
        That's the slogan some politicians love to tote. But the "weathy" would need to be taxed higher than 100% to pay for the spending in our current pipeline.
        Even if we try taxing them more, there's still no getting around the fact that spending is out of control.
      • William 10 mths ago
        What planet are you on? The top 5% of income earners paid 59% of the total income tax revenue while 47% of households would pay no income tax at all in 2009. Get your facts straight.
      • avg.citizen 10 mths ago
        Maybe that's because some of the 47% of households are some of the homeless and unemployed living off unemployment. Surely 20 million plus out of jobs, has to be part of that figure. If you have no earnings from a job, how can you pay taxes?
    • avg.citizen  •  10 mths ago
      Whether they cut, tax, both, or kick the issue down the road after another election, we all know
      we hardworking tax payers are going to have to deal with the worst of it for years and years. Japan went through a recession like we did in the '90's in a period called "The Lost Decade."
      I read an article the other day, that said CEO's were almost back to pre recession earnings, at 23%, while employees, people who are actually working, are still at 1% or lower. Yet the cost of living and healthcare, doesn't stay at levels employers pay employees to be able to provide for themselves and their families.
    • justice-for-all  •  10 mths ago
      The ultimate debt solution is to have more money coming in than going out. The Government needs to raise taxes on corporations and millionaires, then, cut all farm subsidies, foreign aid, end the bankrupting wars, close needless military bases, reduce Congressional retirement, insurance, perks and salaries. The debt will disappear fast. The tax breaks to millionaires and corporations the past 10 years did not create more jobs, it lost jobs and made the wealthy wealthier, at the expense of jobs and the middle class.
    • Anthony M  •  10 mths ago
      Yes we sure don't want to increase taxes on the rich, after all that's where all these millions of jobs are coming from! What a load of crap. How many people have foound themselves with a lot of debt due to one thing or another and have cut their spending but have also taken on another job or worked for themselves to get out? One of the main things that drove our debt was giveaways to the rich by the republican party, using the excuse that it would create jobs. Well, it never has and never will. All should pay their fair share, this is the united states, like any other organization you have to pay dues and create revenue to accomplish anything, so do it.
    • Knowitall  •  10 mths ago
      The companys will come back when people work for chinese wages . The republicans will see to that .The average chinese factory worker earns .96 cents per hr..( I hope no one is hungry . ) Just think of the tax money people will save . Mabe paul ryan can come up with a cook book that tells how to cook and eat senior citizens .
    • Anon  •  10 mths ago
      Mr. Meyer is probably young enough to not know his history and only knows what the right is feeding him. Early in the Reagan administration we went through a recession caused by tightening of the money supply by the Fed in order to break inflation. The economic growth that followed was not caused by Reagan's tax cuts but by loosening of the money supply which fueled the recovery. If the right wants to learn from history, learn that the result of the tax cuts was large budget deficits that were only eliminated when taxes were raised during the Clinton administration. And the deficits then reappeared when Bush Jr. emulated his hero and cut taxes. The result of that was not additional jobs but concentration of wealth to the already wealthy. Jobs will reappear when we can increase demand. They are not created by giving more money to the already rich.
    • Rod J  •  10 mths ago
      Young Americans were instrumental in the election of Obama. Choices have consequences.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  10 mths ago
      It appears, that the rich have a win-win situation: they got free bailout money, which increased the deficit; and because the deficit is too high, the rich want higher interest rates for investing in U.S. Treasury Bonds. In both instances working people pay the bills.
    • Tristain  •  10 mths ago
      Considering this argument has been raised regularly lately, with special attention given during the debt-limit discussions, it would be nice for someone to provide even ONE study that suggests tax increases on the wealthy reduces the number of jobs created. Furthermore, it would be nice to see just how many extra jobs have been created while the wealthy have enjoyed these tax breaks for more than a decade.
    • RICHARD B  •  10 mths ago
      I hate to burst your bubble, but there is not proof that cutting taxes creates jobs or expands the economy. That is a republican myth not based on any facts. Some of the greatest growth this country ever saw was concurrent with a high tax rate, so, the myth is just a lie told by Reagan and his minions.
    • A still small voice  •  10 mths ago
      "Save young Americans from slavery"? Does the author seriously believe that corporate America will save anyone from slavery? Like they have a soul? Since they and their lobbyists have helped 2% of the people own 95+% of the wealth, does he believe that the other 98% of people are loved and cared about by business interests? For sure, we don't need more stupidity like this.
    • MatthewS  •  10 mths ago
      How ridiculous. This author ought to worry less about slavery to a government debt and more about slavery to a corporation, wage slavery. That is the real threat. The quality of jobs available and the pay they provide is rapidly shrinking. We don't invest in education, so the workers needed for more technically savvy jobs and for economy-changing breakthroughs are not being developed. At the same time, those with the natural skills are being shunted into financial jobs that produce a lot of smoke and mirrors but little of any real value.

      Though, I can agree with this author in one sense. Let's go back to the tax rates of the Reagan years.
    • Spirus40  •  10 mths ago
      Cutting taxes will not effectuate job creation in the States. The problem is that the American worker is now competing with offshore labor attainable at a fraction of the cost. Even onshore, illegal labor is used rather than citizen labor on construction projects. If this trend continues, the vast bulk of Americans will not be contributing into the tax revenue pool due to low earnings and the companies who are offshoring will not be contributing due to these tax cuts. Make it cheaper for companies to hire American than offshore or use illegals and the economy would have a better chance of recovery. What I'm seeing proposed is a recipe for for debt.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]