Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    The 'disturbing' rise of super PACs: By the numbers

    A small number of super-wealthy Americans are pumping a lot of lightly regulated money into the political system. Here's how it breaks down

    President Obama got some grief this week when he reversed course on super PACs, suddenly encouraging wealthy supporters to contribute to the political spending behemoths that can accept unlimited donations from individuals and organizations. (Read a quick primer on super PACs here.) Obama campaign manager Jim Messina explained the change of heart as a nod to reality, saying Democrats can't "unilaterally disarm" while cash pours into Republican coffers. How much cash? A lot, say Kenneth Vogel and Abby Phillip at Politico. A new report from two public-interest groups confirms fears "that the cash for big-ticket campaign spending like TV advertising is increasingly controlled by an elite class of super-rich patrons not afraid to plunk down a million bucks or more for favored candidates and causes." Here, a stats-based look at the "disturbing" super PACs:

    299
    Registered super PACs

    SEE MORE: Will the culture war shape the 2012 race?

     

    $181 million
    Amount raised by all super PACs in the past two years

    56
    Percent of those donations that came from "fewer than 200 super-rich people"

    93
    Percent of individual super PAC donors who gave at least $10,000

    SEE MORE: The Nevada caucuses: 5 key questions

     

    $34 million
    Amount donated by just 32 people last year

    17
    People who gave at least $1 million to super PACs last year

    SEE MORE: Tuesday's 'stunning' Santorum sweep: 6 takeaways

     

    15
    $1 million-plus donations that went to Republican-aligned super PACs

    $2 million
    Amount DreamWorks' Jeffrey Katzenberg donated to Obama-aligned Priorities USA Action

    SEE MORE: Next up, Nevada: Can anyone overtake Romney?

     

    $8.6 million 
    Amount Dallas billionaire Harold Simmons and his company gave to American Crossroads and other GOP-aligned super PACs

    $11 million
    Amount casino mogul Sheldon Adelson and his family donated to Newt Gingrich's super PAC

    SEE MORE: Nominating Mitt Malaprop

     

    $175,000
    Amount liberal financier George Soros donated to super PACs (though he made political contributions of more than $20 million in 2004)

    $30.2 million
    Amount raised by Mitt Romney–aligned Restore Our Future PAC last year

    SEE MORE: Is this the 'ugliest, nastiest, dirtiest' campaign ever?

     

    $18.4 million
    Amount raised by Karl Rove–founded American Crossroads last year

    $4.4 million
    Amount raised by Obama-aligned Priorities USA Action

    SEE MORE: Why GOP voters are sitting out the primaries: 4 theories

     

    $250 million
    Non-super PAC funds raised by Obama's campaign and the Democratic National Committee last year 

    Sources: American Prospect, Boston Globe, Christian Science Monitor, Demos, Los Angeles Times, Politico

    SEE MORE: How deep-pocketed super PACs became 'shadow campaigns'

     

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    32 comments

    • Tone  •  3 mths ago
      Buh-bye democracy!!
    • Mark  •  3 mths ago
      The direction of the country is decided by a relatively few, wealthy, partisan super-PACS. You and I are not represented. Change it, and think for yourselves, or accept it and don't expect any change.
    • Dr. Phil  •  3 mths ago
      Who says elections can't be bought?
    • eder  •  Salt Lake City, Utah  •  3 mths ago
      This elections is brought to you by _______.
      • geniusandinsanitywalkdown ... 3 mths ago
        UNIONS (they never get mentioned when they raise the issue of super pacs (the media thinks we are that dumb, we are not)
      • Androgenoide 3 mths ago
        Unions are a part of the problem but then, so is management. Don't cripple the workers without applying similar restraints on their bosses.
    • Topkick  •  3 mths ago
      It will take a SCOTUS reversal to stop SPACS. NEVER HAPPEN in our lifetime!
    • Rufus T. Firefly  •  3 mths ago
      Constitutional amendment to end this #$%$ and fast.
    • Alan  •  Richmond, Virginia  •  3 mths ago
      super PACS equal super corruption
      • geniusandinsanitywalkdown ... 3 mths ago
        UNION corruption (largely goes unnoticed)
      • Androgenoide 3 mths ago
        Sorry, Easily, but union corruption is as well-known as police corruption. It's been with us for a long time. The problem is that, in the context of this debate, they are pretty small players, spending a tiny fraction of what the corporations do. Getting them is on the list but there are bigger fish to fry.
    • RG  •  Belleville, Michigan  •  3 mths ago
      Where is Cobert's Changing Tommorrow, Tommorow.. Super PAC on this list?
    • Philip  •  Santa Clara, California  •  3 mths ago
      Tired of corporations driving the bus in America? Then join us at get money out.
    • Androgenoide  •  3 mths ago
      We have the option of publicly funded campaigns but no one uses it because the other guys will outspend them. A lot of this would go away if there were no other options...
    • Nony  •  3 mths ago
      This article is about 15 years late.
    • Steven K  •  3 mths ago
      We, the American people, have the best politicians money can buy!
    • Yahoo User  •  3 mths ago
      big shout out to those terrific lawyers on the US SC who are allowing our politicians to be corrupted by big money...well, moreso than usual....
    • ishtar127a  •  3 mths ago
      This is how you can tell that very few people bother to pay attention to history, these days.
    • NOTSOFASTED  •  Fresno, California  •  3 mths ago
      LEGAL TREASON!!!!
    • Very  •  3 mths ago
      I have an idea. People could actually use their brains and look at the records of the candidates rather than getting all their information from misleading SuperPAC ads. It's only because voters are lazy that SuperPAC ads are effective.
    • who  •  3 mths ago
      We need all money out of politics and the only way to do that is publicly funded elections. If you are able to get on the ballot, there should be a general fund, and that's all you get to spend aside from small donations ($100 max per person). If you can't get elected by spending roughly the same amount of money as your opponent then you don't deserve to get elected.
    • Topkick  •  3 mths ago
      AP/UPI: February 9th, 2016 The General Auction for the Office of President of the United States has been officially set for Tuesday, November 12th, 2016. All domestic Super PAC bidders for both Parities must be present two days prior to the Auction with Certified Letters of Credit. Foreign SPACs must present International Letters of Credit the same day. The Auction winner must publicly reveal the name of the next President of the United States within twenty four hours of the Auction's closing. No exceptions to the above rules will be considered. Good luck to all of you. And God Help America!
    • David  •  Montgomery, Alabama  •  3 mths ago
      It's sad to see the elections influenced by a few. Which has more influence, a super-pac or a tv network? I was watching CNN in one of the debates where Gingrich was great. Gloria Borger looked stunned after the debate and said "he bilittled the President" as if it was a sin to say something critical of Obama. When Romney did well not long after that, she ran up to Romney and appeared to be praising him for being critical of Gringrich. ABC tried to ruin Gingrich also. Yes, these are difficult times. No wonder good folks like Fred Thompson aren't in the race!
    • Rasser  •  3 mths ago
      Once the corporations bought the Supreme Court/conservative judges, money can now buy public office. I suppose whoever has the most money will win. Those of us without the money of the rich, lose, just like always.