Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    FACT CHECK: Gingrich off on his budget history

    WASHINGTON (AP) โ€” Newt Gingrich overlooked a couple of years of red ink when he asserted Thursday night that he balanced the budget for four years as House speaker. And in claiming sole credit for the achievement, he glossed over the fact that budgets are not a one-man show: There was a Democratic president in town, too.

    In the last debate before the leadoff Iowa Republican presidential caucuses, Gingrich persisted in repeating a claim he has made often in the campaign, sometimes more accurately than others. Here and there, other candidates, too, reprised misstatements or partial truths from the string of debates and from the stump. Mitt Romney once again declared he has spent his life in the private sector, ignoring his years as governor and political candidate.

    A look at some of the claims in the debate and how they compare with the facts:

    GINGRICH: "I balanced the budget for four straight years, paid off $405 billion in debt โ€” pretty conservative."

    THE FACTS: In the 1996 and 1997 budget years, the first two years he served as speaker of the House of Representatives, the government actually ran deficits. In 1998 and 1999, the government ran surpluses. Two more years of surpluses followed, but Gingrich was gone from politics by then and had nothing to do with them.

    Moreover, the national debt went up during the four years Gingrich was speaker. In January 1995, when he became speaker, the gross national debt was $4.8 trillion. When he left four years later, it was $5.6 trillion, an increase of $800 billion.

    To be sure, Gingrich did not single-handedly deepen America's debt, just as he didn't balance any budgets on his own. He was a driving force, along with Democratic President Bill Clinton and figures in both houses of Congress, in the economic setbacks and advancements of that time.

    ___

    ROMNEY: "I spent my life, my career, in the private sector."

    THE FACTS: This is true โ€” except for four years as Massachusetts governor, recent years running for president in the 2008 and 2012 elections, a few years running the Olympics and the time he put into his failed run for a Senate seat in 1994.

    In essence, Romney has devoted himself to political endeavors since his successful run for governor in 2002, and has been pursuing the presidency for five years.

    A month after his term as governor ended in 2007, he announced his campaign for the Republican presidential nomination. After John McCain defeated him for the nomination, Romney devoted himself to building a political network, helping Republican candidates raise money, and writing a book that set the stage for his second run for president.

    Indeed, Romney, who made his fortune as founder of the investment firm Bain Capital, has not held a private-sector job with a regular paycheck for more than a decade.

    ___

    MICHELE BACHMANN: "We have an IAEA report that just recently came out that said literally Iran is within just months of being able to obtain that (a nuclear) weapon."

    RON PAUL: "There is no U.N. report that said that. It's totally wrong, what you just said."

    Bachmann: "It's the IAEA report."

    THE FACTS: As Paul said, the report of the International Atomic Energy Agency does not state that Iran is within months of having nuclear arms. The U.N. agency report does suggest that Iran conducted secret experiments whose sole purpose is the development of nuclear weapons but did not put a time frame on when Iran might succeed in building a bomb, and it made no final conclusion on Tehran's intent.

    Bachmann also erred by arguing that Iran has "stated they will use it (a nuclear weapon) against the United States."

    Iran vehemently rejects that it is developing a nuclear bomb, let alone that it plans to drop one on the U.S.

    ___

    ROMNEY: "I'm firmly in support of people not being discriminated against based upon their sexual orientation. At the same time, I oppose same-sex marriage. That's been my position from the beginning."

    THE FACTS: In large measure, Romney has been consistent in those two positions, despite accusations of flip-flopping on gay rights.

    He walked a fine line back in his failed 1994 Senate campaign, vowing to fight for equality but stopping short of endorsing gay marriage. That's the same line he walked Thursday night.

    He has changed, though, on whether gay marriage should be addressed at the state or federal level. He has favored a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage at least since the beginning of his 2008 presidential bid, when he was the only major Republican candidate to do so. In 1994, he had said the matter should be decided by individual states. That was before the idea of a constitutional ban had gained traction in politics.

    ___

    BACHMANN: "After the debates that we had last week, PolitiFact came out and said that everything I said was true."

    THE FACTS: False.

    For the second debate in a row, Gingrich complained that Bachmann wasn't getting her facts straight, this time when she went after him for the big money he made from Freddie Mac. In her own defense, Bachmann cited ratings from PolitiFact, a fact-checking organization that ranks statements on a scale from true to false, with the worst offender being "Pants on Fire" false.

    PolitiFact rated two Bachmann statements from last week's debate. One, claiming Gingrich once believed in an individual health care mandate, was ranked mostly true. The other, that Romney introduced "socialized medicine" in his state, was judged "Pants on Fire" false.

    Indeed, Bachmann has the worst record of accuracy in the Republican field, as rated by that organization and traced by others. Fully 73 percent of her statements checked by PolitiFact were judged mostly false or worse. Gingrich was wrong the next most often, 59 percent of the time.

    ___

    Associated Press writers Steve Peoples, Bradley Klapper, Douglass K. Daniel and Jim Drinkard contributed to this report.

     
     
    Top Locations Chicago

    131 comments

    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      Fact Check: "Obama is a crook" claimed by the Tea members is wrong!! Obama is actually not a crook as Michelle Obama implied during the CBS interview!! She also said that she is not an angry black woman!! Fact Check did a check and actually saw her smile ... really beaufully executed!!
    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      Fact Check: Obama will boost the US tourism to balance the budget, cover healthcare cost, resuce unemployment rates, increase infra-structures, ... In the meanwhile, Obama is boosting Unions benefits and Green billionaires loan investment to save the economics!!
    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      According to Fact Check:After Obama balance the budget, the US citizens will need 50 years to really balance the budget, mainly working as slaves!!
    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      Fact Check: Newt needed two years to balance the budget according to Fact Check!! Obama may need 4 more years to balance the budget!!!
    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      Fact Check: Obama does balance the budgets by himself!! That's why we have .... a lot of debts!!
    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      Checking Fact Check, "... the fact that budgets are not a one-man show: There was a Democratic president in town, too." is wrong. There is also a Global Warming Democratic Vice President named Al Gore, who lost to George Bush!!
    • rumormater  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  1 mth 0 days ago
      Fact Check: Fact Check works for Obama - Yes, Fact Check works for Obama since 2008!!
    • oceanboy  •  2 mths ago
      Bachmann? What the heck could I possibly say about that?
    • Armand M  •  Tampa, United States  •  2 mths ago
      I have watched all but one of the debates and the candidate, aside from the non-present Gary Johnson, that I am starting to like the most is actually, John Huntsman. He seems more confident, less radical, and more thoughtful and well planed than the others. Someone needs to tell him that he cannot deliver a joke to save his life, but other than that, I think he comes off very competent and presidential.
    • Christie  •  Birmingham, United States  •  2 mths ago
      RON PAUL 2012
    • netjr  •  Modesto, United States  •  2 mths ago
      Newt says so many actual facts he'll never get them all right. Fact Check's illustration here is consistent with main stream medias determination to keep our current failure in charge.
    • chuckie haygo  •  Kansas City, United States  •  2 mths ago
      Any mention of a republican candidate, any candidate and some "news" media outlet
      has to preface it with a "tainted" remark. Well why don't you tell us how wonderful the
      enconomy is stupid? You never wasted an opportunity when a Republican was in the
      whitehouse, yet you always skip it when a Democrat craps in the oval office.
    • dapeck  •  Wall, United States  •  2 mths ago
      at present it looks like i have the following choices according to the polls. obama, newt gingrich and mitt romney. obama has not really done a lot, but he has tried. gingrich is out right crook and a career politician. romney doe not know where he stands on anything. the republicans in all their wisdom has so far made it a race with first backmann, then perry, and now gingrich. i don't see how these people backing these candidates can call anybody else stupid. jon huntsman would be a viable candidate but i guess he's too clean cut for the republican party.
    • PRVT1stclass  •  Raleigh, United States  •  2 mths ago
      Paul is no wimp--IF the USA were attacked, he'd IMMEDIATELY get that Constitutional Declaration of War from Congress, go in, get it done, come home. These un-Constitutional, undeclared, unnecessary, never-ending wars, designed ONLY to further enrich a few, while simultaneously bankrupting this country, are what he's against! In addition, if he received intelligence that an attack was in the works, he'd take the necessary measures to attempt to avoid being attacked.
    • PRVT1stclass  •  Raleigh, United States  •  2 mths ago
      ook, Paul is no wimp--IF the USA were attacked, he'd IMMEDIATELY get that Constitutional Declaration of War from Congress, go in, get it done, come home. These un-Constitutional, undeclared, unnecessary, never-ending wars, designed ONLY to further enrich a few, while simultaneously bankrupting this country, are what he's against! In addition, if he received intelligence that an attack was in the works, he'd take the necessary measures to attempt to avoid being attacked.
    • Michael  •  Pittsburgh, United States  •  2 mths ago
      I don't understand how people can treat an election as if it's a day at the race track. You're not voting for the candidate "most likely to win", you're voting for the candidate who you feel is right for the job and you can make that decision based upon whatever you want.

      But all this talk of who's most electable shows that half of you don't care what the candidate stands for. You just want to be on the winning team.
    • Silent Warrior  •  2 mths ago
      What about Santorum's charge that Mitt Romney is the one responsible for instituting same-sex "marriage" in Massachusetts? He was 100% factual on that statement. As governor Mitt Romney had the power under the Massachusetts Constitution to nullify the state's Supreme Court ruling. All causes of marriage were to be heard and decided by the governor until the legislature would say otherwise. The court had no authority to decide the marriage laws in the state. The state constitution also clearly stated that the court was not to engage in matters reserved to the other two branches of government.

      What was Romney's response? Not only did he not nullify the ruling and protect marriage, he ordered county clerks to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples! He gave the unconstitutional Supreme Court ruling legal backing! If he really had cared about traditional marriage then he would have at least done nothing, and let the unlawful ruling stand powerless. Instead he enforced it, which means he is solely to blame for same-sex "marriage" in Massachusetts.

      I would go further to say that he did this because he wants marriage redefined so that one day it will be redefined to allow for polygamy, which is promoted by the original teachings of Mormonism.
    • Terrence Bass  •  Chicago, United States  •  2 mths ago
      These FACT CHECKS have a tendency of being the most depressing of articles.
      It seemed in the past there were mistakes or ways to misinterpret, where now you have a woman who is on the Intelligence Commitee blathering out anything that pops in her head to score political points.
      Then there's the comments, some who ONCE AGAIN whine about no Obama fact checking, although it was a GOP debate and clearly don't see the articles posted after his speeches.
      Lastly there's the appalling lack of knowledge of how the government is run.
      I understand confusion, but there's always the clowns like Timothy who spout off clearly showing a lack of understanding of how government works in order to get potshots in.
      Really, really depressing.
    • ROFLMAO  •  Houston, United States  •  2 mths ago
      The Flim Flam Man.
    • Terril  •  New Orleans, United States  •  2 mths ago
      People dont seem to understand that correcting a budget deficit is different than tackling government debt. There was no budget surplus because we had so much debt even back then.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]