Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Romney seeks to knock out Gingrich in Florida

    PANAMA CITY/ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - Bolstered by positive poll numbers, Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney on Saturday sought to vanquish rival Newt Gingrich in Florida with a biting new ad about ethics charges and a mocking tone about his debate complaints.

    Just three days ahead of a pivotal primary race that could determine who has the momentum to win the Republican state-by-state nominating battle, the two men spent the day traveling around Florida in a final weekend search for undecided voters.

    Romney, already confident after strong performances in two Florida debates, is gaining ground over his rival for the nomination to take on Democratic President Barack Obama in the November 6 election.

    A Reuters/Ipsos online poll released on Saturday showed Romney, a former governor of Massachusetts and off-and-on Republican front-runner, with an 11 percentage point lead over Gingrich, up from 8 points a day earlier.

    Romney drew support of 43 percent of likely voters in Florida's January 31 primary and Gingrich 32 percent. That compared with a 41 percent to 33 percent showing in the online tracking poll on Friday.

    Romney needs a victory on Tuesday to regain his footing after losing badly to Gingrich in the South Carolina primary last weekend.

    Gingrich, a former speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, needs a Florida win to solidify the front-runner mantle he took on after his resounding victory in the third nominating contests.

    "If we win Florida, I will be the nominee," Gingrich declared at a golf facility in Port St. Lucie.

    Romney has gained momentum in recent days, however, and the former private-equity executive used that and his financial muscle to draw up a closing argument that Gingrich's behavior in Congress made him unfit to be the Republican Party's leader.

    In a simple ad titled "History Lesson" - a play on Gingrich's background as a historian - Romney's campaign showed footage of an NBC television anchor's news report the day Democrats and Republicans found him guilty of ethics violations in 1997.

    "Newt Gingrich, who came to power, after all, preaching a higher standard in American politics, a man who brought down another Speaker on ethics accusations, tonight he has on his own record the judgment of his peers, Democrat and Republican alike," anchor Tom Brokaw says in the report, which makes up the entire ad.

    Gingrich denies wrongdoing and his campaign emphasizes that 83 of 84 "politically motivated" ethics charges against him were found to be without merit and dropped.

    CONTROVERSY

    The ad drew controversy from television network NBC, which asked the Romney team to remove the newscast material from the ad. Anchor Brokaw also voiced objections.

    "I am extremely uncomfortable with the extended use of my personal image in this political ad. I do no want my role as a journalist compromised for political gain by any campaign," he said in a statement.

    Romney's campaign said it was looking at the network's request.

    "We just received the letter. We are reviewing it, but we believe it falls under fair use," said senior adviser Eric Fehrnstrom.

    Gingrich and Romney have sought to tear each other down in the run-up to the Florida election, fighting over who is best equipped to beat Obama.

    Gingrich has boasted of carrying on the legacy of the late President Ronald Reagan, a hero to conservatives, while pushing for the anti-establishment support of the Tea Party.

    "I can run with a history - not a theory, not a promise - that we can create jobs by unleashing the American people," Gingrich told a pastel-clad crowd of golf fans at the PGA golf facility, criticizing Romney as not being a true conservative.

    Over the course of the day Gingrich appealed to groups he hopes will propel him to victory in Florida, holding events with country club Republicans, Hispanics, and religious conservatives at a Baptist mega-church.

    Don Brigham, 60, a golf pro from Port St. Lucie, said Gingrich's comments there helped him make up his mind about whom to support.

    "I was undecided, but I loved what I heard," he said. "I was very impressed with his personality. It's a two-man race on the Republican side. I was very impressed with his message. He pretty much spoke to my political beliefs."

    But Romney's strong performances in this week's debates - venues that have usually favored Gingrich - have resonated with more voters. That momentum fueled confidence in Romney, who mocked his rival for complaining about audience participation.

    "We've had about 18 debates so far, and they're getting more and more fun as time goes on," Romney said at one campaign event.

    "This last one Speaker Gingrich said he didn't do so well because the audience was so loud. The one before he said he didn't do so well because the audience was too quiet. This is like Goldilocks."

    Meanwhile former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum signaled he was not planning to leave the race anytime soon, despite lagging in polls. His campaign on Saturday announced the opening of a headquarters in Nevada, the next state to hold a nominating contest after Florida.

    Santorum won the first contest in Iowa and Romney won the second in New Hampshire.

    Santorum was well behind his rivals in the Reuters/Ipsos poll with 16 percent support, a slight tick up from 13 percent in Friday's results. Texas Representative Ron Paul came in with 6 percent support, up from 5 percent the previous day.

     
    • Rob  •  26 days ago
      "What kind of man would mislead, distort and deceive just to win an election?"

      A politician.
    • Alan  •  26 days ago
      These guys should be wired to polygraphs machines and display their progress during the debates. Now THAT would be awesome!!!
    • Clifford  •  25 days ago
      This election is of course, and always will be, about the economy.
      Our Nationโ€™s Spending Priorities AND Main Street Americaโ€™s major concern:

      1. 6%..... Interest on the $15 TRILLION National DEBT (100% of our GDP)
      2. 20%... National DEFENSE
      3. 14%... Discretionary Spending (includes Congressional and Federal Employee salaries)
      4. 60%... Entitlement Spending (Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, SCHIP, Unemployment)

      BY THE NUMBERS -
      33%... One out of every three Federal Tax dollars is LOST due to fraud, waste and gross mismanagement.
      33%... One out of every three Federal Tax dollars goes UNCOLLECTED due to the illicit drug trade and the growing underground economy.
      40%... Two out of every five Federal Tax dollars is Deficit Spending (BORROWED MONEY).
      And all of the above is growingโ€ฆ every yearโ€ฆ EXPONENTIALLY!
      Now is that stupid as hell or what??

      25% / 85%... The top 25% of the American workforce pays 85% of ALL Federal Income Taxes.
      47% / ZERO PERCENT... The bottom 47% of the workforce pays ZERO PERCENT of ALL Federal Income Taxes.
      Now just exactly what 'fair share' percentage of the Federal Income Taxes should that top 25% of the workforce be paying??

      To take our nation from a National DEBT of $15 TRILLION to a National SURPLUS of $4 TRILLION (rainy day fund), in 30 years at 3.50% interest, is going to require Federal Spending CUTS of a TRILLION BUCKS AND Federal Tax Revenue INCREASES of a TRILLION BUCKS.

      Those Federal Tax Revenue increases MUST come from a healthy, vibrant, sustainable and growing economy, NOT Federal Tax RATE increases. We MUST grow the pie BIGGER!!

      Do you REALLY believe that the Federal Government can do a better job of spending, investing OR donating YOUR HARD EARNED MONEY better than you can??

      I didnโ€™t think so.

      We donโ€™t have a tax problemโ€ฆ but we D**N sure do have a spending problem!
      And it is โ€˜economicโ€™ TREASON to our nation!
    • ray  •  Atlanta, Georgia  •  26 days ago
      Most people are interested in positive things for the country. All of the hate filled comments do not impress the average American. Jobs and the economy is what matters.
    • Stark4090  •  26 days ago
      All that super pac money used for battering sessions, what have we become?
    • Mary Lou  •  25 days ago
      Once again the radical rights are going to try to pick the wrong person.. Newt cannot beat Obama.. he is not the only "conservative" in the race.. He has been a washington insider his whole life.. why do the Tea Partiers think he's an outsider.. that is so laughable.. Now the Evangelicals are picking him too (serial adulter) liar and cheat.. all the traits real christians admire? I am very confused by the so called religious rights pick of Newt.
    • KB  •  25 days ago
      I'd really like to tell them (the politicians) exactly where they can put the all of these polls. Straw or otherwise.
    • clare b  •  Burbank, California  •  25 days ago
      Wouldn't be nice if instead on ripping the other guy apart these clowns would tell us what they would like to do, not what they plan on doing. They can only achieve what Congress will send them to sign. Unless they in reality become dictator. A lot of wind and unkeepable promises when all the votes are tallied!
    • Bronco  •  25 days ago
      Romney new name โ€ฆโ€ฆ..they call him flipper..flipper
    • Scotty  •  25 days ago
      Sounds more like first graders fighting for control of the sandbox!
      Does anyone really believe these millionaires are actually interested
      in your well being? Please!!!
    • Ei8ht  •  San Diego, California  •  26 days ago
      Is it November yet?
    • gary  •  25 days ago
      all this proves for the republicans is that they know the sheep in the conservative movement would vote for a corpse if they are told too, how insane!!!!!!!!! Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
    • Heath Barr  •  25 days ago
      In 1997, the Republican-led House of Representatives voted 395-28 to reprimanded Newt Gingrich for claiming tax-exempt status for a college course that was used for political purposes, and for "intentional or ... reckless" disregard of House rules. He was fined $300,000 for this violation. In 1999, the IRS ruled that none of its own rules were broken w/r/t Newt's claimed tax exemption. So yes, he was cleared by the IRS. Also, his fellow Republicans in the House of Representatives did not approve of his ethics and overwhelmingly voted for him to be reprimanded. This is the only time in the history of the United States of America when a Speaker of the House was ever reprimanded and fined in this manner by his peers.
      In 1998, Gingrich was forced by his fellow Republicans to resign as Speaker of the House, because the Republican Party's loss of popularity that year was blamed mostly on Newt, himself, having alienated a significant number of American voters. Newt's famous quote at that time was, "I'm willing to lead but I'm not willing to preside over people who are cannibals." Keep in mind that the "cannibals" he was talking about were the members of his own Republican Party who voted to kick him out.
    • JimmyP  •  Estero, Florida  •  26 days ago
      I wish that both would stop the attack ads and talk about Issues. Obama is loving these attacks
    • RICHARD_ABC  •  25 days ago
      They both knocked themselves out already at the beginning of their campaign.
    • Hop Singh  •  25 days ago
      Is it amnesia, or do we just like being hamsters on a wheel?
      This election crap is a lot like Christmas:
      Here comes Santa bearing gifts with the same old worn out songs, promises and indoctrination.
      EVERY time we fall for it.
      EVERY TIME we permit ourselves to be pulled into it.
      Regardless of who we "support", the sale is made by pure demonization and lying. The fact is, no matter who we elect, we soon realize that at the core they were in it for the ego stroke and the power and really not much else. So what do we do?...we wait for the next cycle to see what the next Santa is going to bring us using the same old songs and the same old promises.
      And then we buy what they are selling.
    • Will  •  Anchorage, Alaska  •  26 days ago
      A politician making an attack ad? This is news how? Even leading candidates do attack ads.
    • joe  •  25 days ago
      like two little girls going at one another- just knock it off!!
    • a wise word  •  Decatur, Alabama  •  24 days ago
      Again i say there should be a nation wide primary. To hell with all these convoluted displays of power grabbing by the elite. Why is that there were like 7 contenders for the nomination when all this started and now there is only 4 WHEN ONLY 3 STATES HAVE HAD PRIMARIES and a CAUCUS???? How does that make our chance to vote for anyone after these states have voted even matter? Our choices are limited by the cycle of politics that is prevalent in the US. Why should the nominee be decided by a limited number of states when the people of states that haven't voted yet won't get their voice? That isn't a democratic electoral process. It's a bought and paid for mockery of our election process by big money and influence, negative ads and chicanery to the utmost degree. When Super Tuesday arrives and we of the states that finally get to vote, why will there only be, at most, 2 people to choose from? Shouldn't every Republican in every state have a definitive say on who should be the nominee?

      Therefore i call for a referendum on converting to a nationwide primary. And dont get me started on the shiggity mess we call the general election. Popular vote only!
    • zzpat  •  25 days ago
      Romney and Gingrich aren't talking about what they want to do for the country in their ads, they're attacking each other. The ability to buy power and political office is higher now than ever before because of ONE Supreme Court ruling that basically said money is free speech.

      If you think it's bad this time around (the first cycle since that ruling) imagine what it'll be like in four years.

      Assume Obama wins (highly likely). In four years there won't be an incumbent so these super PACS will have to spend billions just be to competitive. Anyone running for office will have to know in advance that he'll have a Super PAC behind him which will fund all the attack ads against his opponent and this time it'll be both sides doing it.

      This is what happens when you give power to conservatives on the Supreme Court...they destroyed Democracy.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]