Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Federal government rejects Texas insurance waiver

    AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — The federal government on Friday rejected a request by Texas to be excluded from a new law that limits how much health insurance companies can spend on overhead.

    The law is part of the Affordability Care Act, changes made in federal health care law in 2010 that Texas officials say is unconstitutional. Part of the bill, known as the medical loss ratio requirement, says that if health insurers do not spend at least 80 percent of their revenue on providing health care or health improvement programs. Health insurers who spend more than 20 percent on overhead and executive salaries will be required to give rebates to customers starting this year.

    Federal officials at the Department of Health and Human Services said Texas did not prove that the state's insurance market would be destabilized by the new law. As a result, Texas health insurers will likely pay out $476 million in rebates over the next three years, said Gary Cohen, acting director of oversight at the agency.

    "We have determined that no adjustment to the 80-20 rule in Texas is warranted," Cohen said. "This means that consumers in Texas will get the full benefit of the Affordable Care Act."

    The Texas Department of Insurance issued a statement rejecting the federal agency's conclusions, saying it did not give insurance companies time to adjust their business models to new rule.

    "A reasonable, responsible phased-in approach would still have afforded rebates to Texas consumers without risking disruption, dislocation and withdrawal of carriers," the department said in a statement.

    The Texas insurance commissioner applied for a waiver from the law in July and asked for permission to allow Texas companies to gradually lower the spending requirement for health services to 71 percent in 2011, 74 percent in 2012 and 77 percent in 2013.

    Seventeen states have applied for waivers, and after Friday's Texas decision, two are pending. Nine states, including Texas, have been denied. Six states have been granted a waiver, although in most cases the agency did not give the state as much as it wanted.

    The states granted a waiver include four with Republican governors: Maine, Nevada, Georgia and Iowa. The states denied include one with a Democratic governor, Delaware. Florida was denied a waiver. Gov. Rick Scott, like Gov. Rick Perry is a big opponent of Obama's health care law.

     

    38 comments

    • Joe  •  Richardson, Texas  •  26 days ago
      I find it extremely funny that the law the insurance companies basicly wrote themselves thanks to all of their lobbiests is already coming back to bite them on their greedy #$%$
    • willr  •  26 days ago
      The insured will pay the tab. poop runs down hill and it starts in Washington D C. I wonder how much the $476m will amount to for each insured. Any guesses on how many people in Texas. The insured may get a postage stamp by the time it is paid out.
    • Tom B  •  26 days ago
      Phil M, I 100% agree with you. Why in the heck is HEALTH CARE COVERAGE a per profit business. Pharmacuticals should be for profit....Doctor care of course....etc, but deciding which treatments are valid and not and bookkeeping/accounting related to health care distribution...uh, NO! A LOT of the difference between the US spending 16% of GDP and most other countries being about 6% of healthcare is easily explained.
      1) FOR PROFIT health insurance companies that do NOT distribute medical treatment
      2) DRUG being allowed to cost 50% more than the same patented drugs cost in Canada
      3) Overuse of specialists in this country when most of the world is skewed the other way towards general practioners.
      These are the MAIN reasons for high healthcare costs. The much balleyhooed malpractice trash raises the costs of healthcare about 1%....NOT a point related to GDP either.
    • enough BS  •  25 days ago
      Simple ... Texans should reject sharing there energy and oil!
    • You're No Fun  •  26 days ago
      "Part of the bill, known as the medical loss ratio requirement, says that if health insurers do not spend at least 80 percent of their revenue on providing health care or health improvement programs."

      Bravo on your nationally published incomplete sentence. Surely all the badly written articles must be some sort of rolling joke yahoo is playing.
    • Average Joe  •  25 days ago
      Just one more example of Washington interjecting itself where it doesn't belong.
    • earn your own way  •  26 days ago
      Oh the good old insurance companies. one day we will see them for what they are... BOOKIES! in a craps game of human fate
    • Phil M  •  Dallas, Texas  •  26 days ago
      Health insurance should not be a for-profit entity. It should be a co-op/collective. There is no reason that such a small percentage of people should make so much money of pain and misery.
    • Tom B  •  26 days ago
      Like I said when the Health Care Reform Act was over, the days of the health insurance gravy train are OVER! Isn't it hypocritical that everyone says the federal government is inefficient, blah, blah, blah, but when HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES have HUGE overhead that has NOTHING to do with the effectiveness of health care or claims being paid, etc, it is unreasonable to expect them to be efficient. Hey, insurance companies, can't do your jobs in an efficient manner, maybe we need Single Payer and get rid of the INCOMPETENT middle men, huh?
    • KC  •  Dallas, Texas  •  26 days ago
      Texas ranks amongs the highest in uninsured. Children w/out insurance is amongst the highest. Child poverty rates are amongst the highest in the country. Not really that great once you get past Ricky bragging.
    • wajang1000  •  26 days ago
      Get rid of the middleman insurance companies. Why should the consumers pay for a middleman which has been extorting high premiums for the benefit of high salaried executives. The system still needs to be reformed further. How can you enjoy the pursuit of happiness if you're as sick as crap and cannot afford access or you have the fear that high medical costs will cause you to lose your house.
    • Daniel  •  25 days ago
      All the more reason that Obamacare MUST be repealed as quickly as possible and at any cost.
    • Johnnie W  •  Dallas, Texas  •  26 days ago
      "As a result, Texas health insurers will likely pay out $476 million in rebates over the next three years, said Gary Cohen, acting director of oversight at the agency."
      Any guess as to who will pay for the rebates in the long run? And if you guess the insurance companies, guess again!! Who do we have to thank for this crap?
    • Johnb  •  Fort Worth, Texas  •  26 days ago
      I've been paying car and house insurance for the last 30 years and never used it once. What a waste of money. Insurance is man's biggest scam.
    • Michael T  •  26 days ago
      Written and directed by insuance companies and "bought" via lobbyists. They feared that Congress would demand lower profits & salaries. Be careful what you "wish" for, corporate felons.
    • Dee  •  26 days ago
      The state of Georgia should never have been granted a waiver!!!! The insurance companies in Georgia are ripping us off big time!!!! We need the opportunity to buy into Medicare if we wish!!!

      I wish we could tell the likes of BlueCross of Georgia to go straight to HELL!!!!
    • Lucy H  •  Dallas, Texas  •  26 days ago
      Why do the politicians in these states support the health insurance companies in their quest for more profits at our expense? If they had their way, they would keep as much of our money as they could get away with. It must really upset them that they are limited to 20%. I would rather not see any more doctors go broke because of the insurance companies (and their stockholders) greediness.
    • Ruby  •  Dallas, Texas  •  26 days ago
      Another example why Rick Perry and his Texas connection should not be in Washington
    • Ralph  •  Dallas, Texas  •  25 days ago
      In Texas, the purpose of government is to facilitate big business's rape of the public. When you move here, you get a little sample pack of KY and a brochure on how to properly grab your ankles.
    • JustMe  •  25 days ago
      all that money they make from refusing to pay benefits to people in need, you would have thought they had enough saved up already. Oh but that's right, they would rather pay their top level magt millions of dollars instead of provide insurance to those who have been paying it since the day before forever.

      I know that insurance is a business but it is also like a pyramid scheme of sorts, thus I don't feel sorry for them at all. In fact, who cares if they go out of business.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]