Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Feds: Religious employers must cover the pill

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Many church-affiliated institutions will have to cover free birth control for employees, the Obama administration announced Friday in an election-year move that outraged religious groups, fueling a national debate about the reach of government.

    In a concession, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said nonprofit institutions such as church-affiliated hospitals, colleges and social service agencies will have one additional year to comply with the requirement, issued in regulations under President Barack Obama's health care overhaul.

    "I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services," Sebelius said in a statement.

    Yet the concession was unlikely to stop a determined effort by opponents to block or overturn the rule. If they fail, some predicted that religious employers would simply drop coverage for their workers, opting instead to pay fines to the federal government under the health care law.

    "Never before has the federal government forced individuals and organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their conscience," said New York Cardinal-designate Timothy Dolan, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. "This shouldn't happen in a land where free exercise of religion ranks first in the Bill of Rights."

    Officials said the administration's ruling was carefully considered, after reviewing more than 200,000 comments from interested parties and the public. The one-year extension, they said, responds to concerns raised by religious employers about making adjustments. Administration officials stressed that individual decisions about whether or not to use birth control, and what kind, remain in the hands of women and their doctors.

    Underscoring the sensitivity of the decision, Obama personally spoke with Dolan on Friday to inform him of the announcement, an administration official said.

    The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a powerhouse law firm based in Washington that tackles religious freedom issues, predicted in a statement that religious groups "will never pay for abortion drugs in violation of their religious beliefs." Many religious conservatives consider the morning-after birth control pill to be an abortion drug.

    Liberals and women's rights groups praised the decision, saying that women who work for religious employers should not have to accept a lower standard of health coverage.

    "The administration stood firm," said Nancy Keenan, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America. "As a result millions will get access to contraception, and they will not have to ask their bosses for permission."

    Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington, a member of Senate leadership, said, "The president made the right decision by putting access and the reproductive rights of women first."

    Birth control use is virtually universal in the United States, and most health insurance plans cover the pill, usually with copays. Still, about half of all pregnancies are unplanned.

    At issue is a provision of the health care law that requires insurance plans to cover preventive care for women free of charge to the employee. Last year, an advisory panel from the respected Institute of Medicine recommended including birth control on the list, partly because it promotes maternal and child health by allowing women to space their pregnancies.

    Sebelius agreed, issuing a new federal regulation last summer.

    That rule, however, exempted houses of worship and their employees, as well as other institutions whose primary purpose is to promote religious belief. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other places would not be required to cover contraceptives, it specified.

    It was a different story for religious-affiliated hospitals, colleges and social service agencies.

    Although many of those employers had not traditionally covered birth control, the new regulation required them to do so. Catholic hospitals, which at a critical moment had defied the bishops to back Obama's health care law in Congress, immediately sought a broader exemption. On Friday they were denied.

    Representing some 600 hospitals, the Catholic Health Association expressed disappointment.

    "The challenge that these regulations posed for many groups remains unresolved," said Sister Carol Keehan, president of the group. "This indicates the need for an effective national conversation on the appropriate conscience protections in our pluralistic society, which has always respected the role of religions."

    The administration says between 1 million and 2 million people work for religious-affiliated institutions, though it's not clear how many would be affected. Some states already require religious employers to cover the pill.

    For religious-affiliated employers, the requirement will take effect August 1, 2013, and their workers in most cases will have access to coverage starting January 1, 2014.

    Women working for secular enterprises from profit-making companies to government will have access to the new coverage starting January 1, 2013, in most cases.

    Workplace health plans will have to cover all forms of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration, ranging from the pill to implantable devices to sterilization. Also covered is the morning-after pill, which can prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex and is considered as tantamount to an abortion drug by some religious conservatives.

    However, the new regulation does not require coverage of abortions.

    ___

    Associated Press writer Julie Pace contributed to this report.

     
    • Ph0t0gr4pher  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  4 mths ago
      Pretty ironic; where are the separation of church and state advocates now?

      @Wombat: I'll be praying for you :)
    • Raleigh  •  4 mths ago
      A law that "balances" religious rights? How is that Constitutional?
      • WINNER 3 mths ago
        the church want have to for for birth control for those good catholic's
    • Stephen  •  Millersville, Pennsylvania  •  4 mths ago
      Even as an Atheist I find this government meddling offensive. I feel sorry for those whose beliefs this mandate soils on. Donating money to a charity does NOT gove you the right to tell them how to operate. Secondly, if an employee doesn't like their health coverage they are free to find a job elsewhere. This War on Religion in this country has to stop NOW!!!
    • CatLover  •  Las Vegas, Nevada  •  4 mths ago
      What a joke. Since when did the pill become a necceary medicine to make a someone sick well, or deal with an injury? I am not against birth control, but let's get serious. Why is it anyone else's responsibility to buy someone else birth control pills or rubbers so they can fool around and have a good time? If that is the case, then I want them to pay for my dope!!!
      • A Yahoo! User 4 mths ago
        There are other serious medical conditions that the same pills treat.
      • WINNER 3 mths ago
        good catholic ,never have unplanned sex , whats' the problem, they want pay anything
    • Debs  •  Los Angeles, California  •  4 mths ago
      "I believe this proposal strikes the appropriate balance between respecting religious freedom and increasing access to important preventive services"

      There is no "balance." There is only the executive branch of the government infringing on our constitutional right to free exercise. We, the members of the Catholic Church, believe that abortion is a sin. We believe that artificial birth control is a sin. This president and his minions have no authority to force us to act against our religious beliefs. Zip. Zero. Zilch.

      BTW. No one is forcing anyone to accept a "lower standard of health coverage." If women want these "services," all they have to do is WORK FOR SOMEONE ELSE.
    • William  •  Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  •  4 mths ago
      I get it!! The Government feels that separation of Church and State only applies as long as the government can tell us what is Morally acceptable. Let's vote everyone out of Washington and start over with people whio WANT to uphold the Constitution, not their own wallets!!!!
      • Ph0t0gr4pher 4 mths ago
        I concur with getting everyone out of Washington. It is in the people's power to issue a recall.
    • LinD  •  Richardson, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      Calling it a "woman's right to choose" is a lie. It's not her body, so it's not her choice. If a doctor puts his hand inside you during surgery, is his hand yours? If your boyfriend or husband puts his genitals inside you during sex, are his genitals part of your body? Similarly, if another human being is temporarily inside your body until it is born, it is not part of your body. Thus, you do not have the moral right to murder that human being just because you're selfish and it's inconvenient to you, or because Obama says you can. It's not a choice, it's a child!
      • A Yahoo! User 4 mths ago
        then she should have the option to remove it from her body.
      • LinD 4 mths ago
        Not if doing so would kill the other person. It's illegal to separate Siamese twins if it would kill one of them and they would both live if they stayed connected. It should be the same for a woman and the baby within her.
      • B 4 mths ago
        So how many unwanted black crack babies have you adopted?
    • WildBillCody  •  Binghamton, New York  •  4 mths ago
      Can anyone show me where in the US constitution that the president has any type of authority to do any such thing?
      • David 4 mths ago
        The goverment does not have the authority, and soon he will be gone.
      • Chicago 4 mths ago
        Thats what I thought until Gringrich won the NC primary. If Gringrich ends up the Republican nominee than Obama will win a second term.
      • Debs 4 mths ago
        He doesn't. It isn't there. The dictator-in-chief couldn't care less about the constitution or our rights.
    • EdwardA  •  Corpus Christi, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      Congress shall make no law regarding religion.
    • UnHappy  •  Dallas, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      Many Catholics are Democrats........................... Most Latino's are Catholic....He's lost votes on this one for sure.
    • Russell  •  4 mths ago
      When religious freedom is removed, the rest of our freedoms will soon follow.
    • Collin  •  Ypsilanti, Michigan  •  4 mths ago
      This shows an alarming lack of understanding and respect for conscience among our rulers, especially those of the progressive stripe. Try to understand how you would feel if you were forced to pay for a doctor whose methods involved sacrificing a child's liver. For a Catholic who believes their Church's teaching, paying for an abortifacient is no less evil. Our country long ago recognized that to shove a gun in the hand of a Quaker and send him into battle is an evil act; but as the federal Gov't is more involved in everyday life and its regulations and money get everywhere, and impose their one-size-fits-all ideas of right and wrong on everyone, conscience (and every lesser freedom) is at grave risk.
    • UnHappy  •  Dallas, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      Eventually you'll have to apply to have a baby..................Get the Government out of peoples bedrooms!!!
    • nancy  •  Madison, Wisconsin  •  3 mths ago
      What is the big deal? No one is forcing anyone to use the pill. Religious people employed by others have to make these decisions already and are perfectly capable of it. Get over yourselves. Wah Wah Wah. There are worse things to worry about.
    • nazi feminist  •  3 mths ago
      Hate mongering liberal bigots are first in line to force their personal religious beliefs on everyone else. They certainly force their personal religious beliefs onto the baby to the point of killing them.
    • Big Leo  •  Gila Bend, Arizona  •  4 mths ago
      Once Catholics were a strongly Democratic constituency with virtually no Republicans. Now it's half and half. Keep it up, Dems. You can drive those nasty mackerel snappers out of you keep trying this hard.
    • Phrank  •  4 mths ago
      If this is not socialism, WHAT IS!!!??? A direct violation of the Constitution of the United States of America.............guns will be next....
    • vrg  •  4 mths ago
      4 more years of Obama and comrades will stand in line for toilet paper.
    • Dar  •  4 mths ago
      The fainting of religious liberties is similar to the fainting of a canary in a mine. It is a warning to us all.

      The intervention of the federal government between my neighbor and her employer is an unconstitutional and harmful violation of their inalienable rights.

      I encourage a steadfast stand against infringements on our freedoms.
    • Jacqueline Theodelinda  •  Los Angeles, California  •  4 mths ago
      Rather than forcing employers to pay for coverage which violates their religious principles, employees who want contraception or sterilization should either work for an employer that has no moral objections to those things, or pay for those things themselves
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...