Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    First-class mail: Just a little bit s-l-o-w-e-r

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Already mocked by some as "snail mail," first-class U.S. mail will slow even more by next spring under plans by the cash-strapped U.S. Postal Service to eliminate more than 250 processing centers. Nearly 30,000 workers would be laid off, too, as the post office struggles to respond to a shift to online communication and bill payments.

    The cuts are part of $3 billion in reductions aimed at helping the agency avert bankruptcy next year. They would virtually eliminate the chance for stamped letters to arrive the next day, a change in first-class delivery standards that have been in place since 1971.

    The plan technically must await an advisory opinion from the independent Postal Regulatory Commission, slated for next March. But that opinion is nonbinding, and only substantial pressure from Congress, businesses or the public might deter far-reaching cuts.

    Many postal customers will be upset.

    "The post office is a mainstay of America, and the fact that these services will no longer be available is absolutely crazy," said Carol Braxton of Naperville, Ill., as she waited in line at a mail sorting center Monday with the holiday shipping season picking up steam.

    "Well I'm not happy about them, but what else can you do with this economy? If they're getting ready to go bankrupt, it's better to cut back than to go totally bankrupt," said Deborah Butler of Brandywine, Md., who was at a Washington, D.C., post office. "You still need them. Because everybody can't afford the other ones, like express mail and things like that. .Even though the world is computer literate, everybody doesn't have computers."

    At a news briefing in Washington, postal vice president David Williams said the post office needs to move quickly to cut costs as it seeks to stem five years of red ink amid steadily declining mail volume. After hitting 98 billion in 2006, first-class mail volume is now at less than 78 billion. It is projected to drop by roughly half by 2020.

    The agency already has announced a 1-cent increase in first-class mail to 45 cents beginning Jan. 22.

    Williams said in certain narrow situations first-class mail might still be delivered the next day — if, for example, newspapers, magazines or other bulk mailers are able to meet new, tighter deadlines and drop off shipments directly at the processing centers that remain open.

    But in the vast majority of cases, everyday users of first-class mail will see delays. The changes could slow everything from check payments to Netflix's DVDs-by-mail, add costs to mail-order prescription drugs and even threaten the existence of newspapers and time-sensitive magazines delivered by postal carrier to far-flung suburban and rural communities.

    The Postal Service faces imminent default — this month — on a $5.5 billion annual payment to the Treasury for future retiree health benefits and expects to have a record loss of $14.1 billion next year.

    "Are we writing off first class mail? No," Williams said. "Customers are making their choices, and what we are doing is responding to the current market conditions and placing the Postal Service on a path to allow us to respond to future changes. We have to do what's in our control to put the Postal Service on sold financial ground."

    The cuts would close 252 of the nation's 461 mail processing centers beginning next spring. They would result in the elimination of roughly 28,000 jobs. The number of employees varies by processing facility but generally ranges from about 50 to 2,000. Cincinnati, Boston, Orlando and New Orleans are home to some of the largest centers.

    Because the consolidations typically would lengthen the distance mail travels from post office to processing center, the agency also would lower delivery standards. Currently, first-class mail is supposed to be delivered to homes and businesses within the continental U.S. in one to three days. That would lengthen to two to three days, meaning mailers no longer could expect next-day delivery in surrounding communities. Periodicals could take two to nine days.

    About 42 percent of first-class mail is now delivered the following day. An additional 27 percent arrives in two days, about 31 percent in three days and less than 1 percent in four to five days. Following the change next spring, about 51 percent of all first-class mail is expected to arrive in two days, with most of the remainder delivered in three days.

    The Postal Service initially announced in September it was studying the possibility of closing the processing centers and published a notice in the Federal Register seeking comments. Within 30 days, the plan elicited nearly 4,400 public comments, mostly in opposition.

    Catalogue companies worry they won't be able to predict when their catalogues will arrive and therefore when to add staff to handle increased call volumes. Small business owners say sluggish first-class mail will slow their businesses because merchandise and payments will spend more time in transit.

    On Monday, postal customers said they valued having mail service but also acknowledged the realities of the Internet in everyday life.

    "The post office services that we need as a nation are just too big at this point, so things have to be cut and there is nothing that can be done to change it other than email goes away," Ron Connor of Naperville, Ill., said as he walked into a local post office branch.

    Lily Ickow, from Silver Spring, Md., said the post office needs to find other ways than wide-scale cuts to reach profitability. "It's definitely too bad," she said at a Washington post office. "I think the Postal Service is necessary personally. ...It would be useful to see if there are ways that they could innovate and come up with other types of services."

    Separate bills that have passed House and Senate committees would give the Postal Service more authority and liquidity to stave off immediate bankruptcy. But prospects are somewhat dim for final congressional action on those bills anytime soon, especially if the measures are seen in an election year as promoting layoffs and cuts to neighborhood post offices.

    Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe has been pushing for congressional changes that would give the agency more authority to reduce delivery to five days a week, raise stamp prices and reduce health care and other labor costs.

    But the agency also opposes current provisions in the House and Senate legislation that would require additional layers of review before it could close post offices and processing centers.

    The Postal Service, an independent agency of government, does not receive tax money, but is subject to congressional control on major aspects of its operations. The changes in first-class mail delivery could go into place without permission from Congress.

    Maine Sen. Susan Collins, the top Republican on the Senate committee that oversees the post office, believes the agency is taking the wrong approach. She says service cuts will only push more consumers to online bill payment or private carriers such as UPS or FedEx, leading to lower revenue.

    The Senate bill would refund nearly $7 billion the Postal Service overpaid into a federal retirement fund, encourage a restructuring of health benefits and reduce the agency's annual payments into a future retiree health account. No other agency or business is required to make such health prepayments.

    Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, a member of the House committee that oversees the agency, said he would fight the postal changes.

    "This privatization plan is bad for Americans, bad for businesses, bad for the economy and bad for workers. We can do better than to dismantle the Postal Service and privatize its operations," he said.

    Ruth Goldway, chair of the Postal Regulatory Commission, said the commission will be reviewing the proposal closely to ensure that the Postal Service can continue its mission of providing adequate, effective service in a fair manner to all parts of the U.S. She said, "I think if the Postal Service does not respond to public concerns, it will bear the consequences of that itself."

    ___

    AP video journalist Robert Ray in Naperville, Ill., AP television producer Kelly Daschle in Washington and business writer Jonathan Fahey in New York contributed to this report.

    ___

    Online:

    List of facilities to be closed:

    http://about.usps.com/news/electronic-press-kits/our-future-network/study-list-110915.pdf

     

    564 comments

    • Zuck Likes CISPA  •  5 mths ago
      The FDIC can set its own rates, but the Postal Service cannot. Being micro-managed by Congress makes no sense.
      • chesswizzy 5 mths ago
        makes no $ either !!!
      • Andrew 5 mths ago
        The FDIC setting it's own rates is how we got into our current economic woes.
      • Michael Bergeron 5 mths ago
        Just think how much freedom the PRIVATE Federal Reserve has over setting interest rates and dollar value
    • Arti  •  Greeneville, United States  •  5 mths ago
      2009 postmaster general and 17 other execs recieve payraises that almost Double their pay plus huge bonuses every year, 38 poatal execs make more than government cabinet members triple that of last year, government takes 5.5 BILLION off the top of postal profits for "prefunding of retirees 75 years in advance" money goes into general funds and is spent every year by congress, want to make cuts start at the TOP and work your way down.
    • Jeff Jacobs  •  Las Vegas, United States  •  5 mths ago
      The postmaster general is the 2nd HIGHEST paying government job... The only job that pays more... Yes that's right the president.... STARTS AT THE TOP. Donahoe the first decision is to lower YOUR WAGES!!!!
      • Ed 5 mths ago
        Actually Jeff the PMG with his bonuses makes more than the President. He made over $800,000 last year!
      • Andrew 5 mths ago
        I wish people would stop tunnel visioning on the salary of a single person in an organization that is failing. He made nearly a million dollars? Big Deal, the post office is going to lose 15 BILLION!! next year alone.

        For those of us bad at math, assuming that the PMG made $1million even, his salary makes up 1/15,000th of the losses that year.
      • Jeff Jacobs 5 mths ago
        @ Andrew. No one is tunnel visioning. It just is like the banks we loaned them money and the execs got bonuses. Does not make sense.
    • Keithley  •  Mccall, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Notice how none of these news artlcles about this situation today is mentioning what is really breaking the back of USPS. The "poison pill" that was put into law in a lame-duck congress back in 2006. This required the Postal Service to prefund within 10 years future retirees health care benefits for 75 years into the future. About a 6 billion dollar a year payment for the next decade. Why aren't they mentioning this? The Postal Worker Union states that if it wasn't for this payment USPS would be in the black this last year even with all of the electronic mail.
      • dallasmsl 5 mths ago
        Story was written by some Republican hack.
      • RonH 5 mths ago
        You are obviously another disillusioned liberal Democrat, probably one of the unionized postal workers who ruined the postal service efficiency years ago.
      • TK3 5 mths ago
        You were NOT supposed to know that !
    • lucky lion  •  5 mths ago
      Congress mandated that the USPS "prefund" it's retirement and healthcare 75 years in advanced in just ten years. How many private companies could afford that? How many private companies would TOLERATE that? Do you really think that money went into a savings account? Congress doesn't want to give it back because they spent it. The USPS never had a problem paying it's pension or healthcare obligations. Why were they required to "prefund" for employees that haven't even been born yet? How can you even begin to guess how much it would cost?
      • Robbie 5 mths ago
        You're right. What other government/private entity have to prepay 75 years into the future? Other than the USPS...nobody else. Also, while it was true they were losing money, they were in the black untill 2006. From 2007 to the present, they're in the red by what is legalized extortion by congress.
      • TheOtherSide 5 mths ago
        It was the Democrat controlled Congress that did this to screw the post office in 2006, so why does the postal union work so hard to tell the post office employees to vote Democrat?
      • Michael 5 mths ago
        @Thebigdomboski Hey #$%$ the bill was enacted in December 2006 (signed by Bush). At that time the house and senate was controlled by the GOP. The Democrats didn't take control of the house and senate until January of 2007.
    • Dalton J  •  Indianapolis, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Slowing mail down is not the answer to help USPS. There have to be other measures. Perhaps investigating all installations and offices for unnecessary higher paid managers and supervisors. Having 4 or more in an office is not cost-saving. It is wasteful. Even putting one Station Manager in two stations instead of one would save a bunch. Example: If a station has only one zip code in its delivery zone, combine this with another single zip code station. The manager could work 2 days at one station and 3 at the other and visa versa. Instead of 2 managers, there will be one. Saving loads of money. Cutting service is not the answer. Cutting unnecessary high paying jobs is.
      • A Yahoo! User 5 mths ago
        The truth as usual is complex and largely hidden. Unfortunately, most people watch Fox News and read corporate-controlled media, if they bother to read at all. I say, "Follow the money."
      • Dalton J 5 mths ago
        What about the manager idea?
      • M 5 mths ago
        add more automated machines instead of only one in the corner.
    • Lieutenant Dan  •  5 mths ago
      Too bad we already gave away all of our money to rich people and borrowed more from them so we could give them more money and give them interest on the money we borrowed from them to give to them. We could have used a postal service, too. I guess we're just really smart.
    • Crtically Concerned  •  Modesto, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Formula for governmental idiocy: reduce the quality of servce and encourage more customers to use the internet, thereby reducing the volume of mail.
    • diffikultD  •  Champaign, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Send in all the junk mail you get from banks, etc...then the usps gets paid for the prepaid postage envelopes...you can even just send in the prepaid envelope empty.
    • James  •  5 mths ago
      A little slower is better than another bailout!!
    • Jor  •  5 mths ago
      Wait, U mean mail SNAIL mail is NOW going to get EVEN SLOOOOOOOOWEEEEEER. GOOD GRIEF!!!!!!!
    • Retired and Taxed  •  Grandville, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Lets keep going Congress ! Pretty soon nobody will be working in this country ! Why dont you get rid of the blood sucking lobbiest and 50 percent of your healthy pensions and unbelievable health care for a start. Then shut down the United Nations you #$%$ away more than 11 Billion every year that hasnt done anything for years. Then ground Michelle Obamas 737 private jet she flys around in, I could go on and on about government waste !
    • kkfredde  •  Anaheim, United States  •  5 mths ago
      This is probably the only government entity that has not borrowed from Social Security to fund it's operations.
    • Notta Martha Fan  •  Doylestown, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Why the hell don't they just cut back on Saturday delivery? They would save millions by doing that, alone. I could live without getting mail on Saturday.
    • MP  •  5 mths ago
      The price of a first class stamp should come down then if your not giving first class service!
    • Tilt  •  Newark, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Well duh. Something has to give. They should consider no more deliveries to the door or driveway. Replaced with boxes of mailboxes at the end of each street. Or post office boxes for every address.
    • post a comment  •  Concord, United States  •  5 mths ago
      'The cuts are part of $3 billion in reductions aimed at helping the agency avert bankruptcy next year. They would virtually eliminate the chance for stamped letters to arrive the next day, a change in first-class delivery standards that have been in place since 1971 ....'
      The US Taxpayers borrow 2.81 billion dollars everyday -1.025 trillion a year- for the 'military industrial OIL complex' and the two wars....yet no widespread complaints.....and we are going to handicap or own postal service.....
    • George  •  5 mths ago
      These actions would be like an automobile manufacturer increasing prices, closing dealerships, and reducing the number of models available. Most automobile manufacturers would realize that these actions would not increase their profit margin, but would only drive away customers and cut their corporate throats. Of course, the USPS top managers will use their reductions to justify awarding themselves large pay raises and performance bonuses.
    • Kdevil66  •  Mchenry, United States  •  5 mths ago
      The Congress has setup the Post Office for failure, they have forced the USPS to pay for 75 years worth of a pension in a 10 year span. This has never been done. It is brought to you by the paid lobbyists of Fed Ex and UPS to get more business.
    • Bruce  •  5 mths ago
      Personally, I don't use the postal service that much.

      However, I own a small business and we mail out statements every month to customers. If it will take 2 to 3 days for local mail instead of one, that will considerably slow down my accounts receivable. Two or three days to them, two or three days back to me, adds a week of transit time.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...