Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Should glitter bombers get jail time?

    A Colorado college student could wind up behind bars for throwing glitter on Mitt Romney. Excessive punishment or a necessary deterrent?

    Colorado's Tuesday state caucuses were tough on Mitt Romney. Not only did he lose, he was glitter bombed. Colorado authorities this week filed misdemeanor criminal charges against Peter Smith, a 20-year-old college student, for throwing glitter on Romney to protest the Republican presidential candidate's general platform. Though glitter bombers have similarly enhanced Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Ron Paul — more typically to protest the candidates' position on gay marriage — Smith is the first person criminally charged for the increasingly popular stunt that could, say some medical professionals, lead to scratched corneas or even loss of sight. If convicted, Smith could face up a $1,000 fine and up to six months in prison. Fair punishment?

    It's about time one of these fools went to jail: Enough is enough, says the Duluth, Minn., News Tribune in an editorial. "Arresting a glitter bomber may seem unnecessary and over-the-top, but a criminal record and fine (or other punishment) can send a message to would-be copycats" before someone decides glitter isn't "flashy enough," and tries throwing something more serious, "like acid or worse." Besides, there are more effective ways to take a stand than "making yourself into a public spectacle."
    "Why no arrests after glitter-bombings?"

    At most these harmless protesters deserve a warning: "This is absurd and outrageous," says gossip blogger Perez Hilton. Smith absolutely does not deserve to go to jail for such a "totally nonviolent act of protest" — especially one that was "barely even successful!" The young man was merely expressing his political views in a way that was "pretty much harmless." At most, they should let him off with a stern warning.
    "WTF! 20-Year-Old Student who glitter bombed Mitt Romney may get jail time!"

    Eventually, someone was bound to end up behind bars: The authorities looked the other way the first time a GOP presidential candidate was glitter-bombed, says Erik Hayden at TIME. And the second. And the third. But at this point "nearly every single GOP presidential candidate has faced the ire of the glitter bomb[er]," and it's getting increasingly difficult to condone these assaults. The more the glitter piles up, the more likely it is that the authorities will use prosecution, and jail time, as a deterrent.
    "'Glitter-bombing' a politician could get you six months in jail"

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    87 comments

    • Billie  •  3 mths ago
      I kinda like the throw shoes thing like they did to Bush... I know I know, its all fun and games till someone pokes an eye out.... Cream pies? hmmmmmmmm cream pies....
      • Robert Retka 3 mths ago
        Oh your into cream pies, how many at one time for you?
    • Sputnik  •  New York, New York  •  3 mths ago
      the glitter bombers should NOT get jail time, but the targets of the glitter bombers typically deserve some jail time though.
    • Roger Woolworths C.S.  •  3 mths ago
      The pussification of the US is almost complete.
    • GregK  •  Flint, Michigan  •  3 mths ago
      Common law definition of battery, "any unlawful touching of the person of another by the aggressor himself, or by a substance put in motion by him". It is not a question of republicans or democrats, gay or straight, or any other factors. The fact is, the act is already deemed illegal and it is up to the discretion of the victim as to whether they will press charges or not.

      Maybe this says more about the character of Romney considering the other candidates have all received similar treatment and brushed it off as harmless.
    • irish2  •  3 mths ago
      The first time I heard of it was in MN, who was running for Governor, unfortunately for my family who lives there, just a few votes separated him and Mark Dayton, a former senator who was voted one of the top five senators in history and those in Minnesota turned around and elected him- of course out of staters came in and they did find fraud. Buyers remorse. Dayton also vetoed Voter ID, mmmmmmmmmm
    • unfair  •  3 mths ago
      So throw something a bit more serious. Then arrest'em
    • Daniel  •  Burbank, California  •  3 mths ago
      So, according to Perez Hilton, throwing items at someone is ""totally nonviolent act of protest" It's not just assault, it's actual battery.

      See, if you swing at someone and MISS, it's still assault. You swing at someone and connect, it's battery as well.

      People don't have the right to throws thing at people with whom they disagree. That's normally something learned in before the first grade.
      • Heisenberg 3 mths ago
        It's #$%$ glitter, not a brick.
    • Tom  •  3 mths ago
      Whatever happened to just throwing vegetables like tomatoes at politicians and bad actors?
      Will glitter be banned as a WMD now? Nonsense, total nonsense.
      Let's get back to tarring and feathering the politicians and riding them out of town on a rail.
      • Richard Z 3 mths ago
        Great idea--- first tar and feather, then pour on the glitter.
    • George  •  Fremont, California  •  3 mths ago
      the glitter bomber should get asylum time, some weed, and a confetti parade, while Romney should get jail time
    • PAUL  •  3 mths ago
      Perez Hilton's opinion is still worth more than used toilet paper?
      • Rick 3 mths ago
        Not really. What his opinion is made of is what you find in used toilet paper. Better to flush both before they stink up the place.
    • Mukluk Joe  •  3 mths ago
      If it's required by your religion, it would be unconstitutional to be punished for it.
    • C  •  3 mths ago
      No. No reason to waste money to put them in prison.

      Give them a fine (max fine) and probation.
    • robbie  •  3 mths ago
      How is it even a crime. These high and mighty so and so's are the problem. They think they are ABOVE the People and not OF the people. There is no harm except to their fragile and over inflated egos.
      • C 3 mths ago
        It's no different than hocking a loogie on someone.
      • Kirara 3 mths ago
        C, That would also be illegal. The real reason that this needs to be taken in hand is that there is no way for the authorities know in advance if all that it is ONLY glitter. For all they know there could be anthrax mixed in there
      • robbie 3 mths ago
        It could be anthrax, now we arrest people for it could be? Exactly what is a problem today. I think its freedom of expression and right to protest!
    • robbie  •  3 mths ago
      Oh does that make the lady at the cosmetic counter a perfume bomber since she sprays you as you walk by?
      Arrest her too.
    • E D  •  Boston, Massachusetts  •  3 mths ago
      Aren't they domestic terrorist? Indefinite detention without trial or charges is what the law now says lol!!!!!!!!!
    • Chuck  •  3 mths ago
      Glitter bombers are fined and go to jail. Crooked CEO's walk free with a million dollar bonus. American justice.
    • Ted Stosterone  •  3 mths ago
      PS you could attack a politician with a bubble machine and you are STILL gonna get charged with assault.....And the sky is STILL blue.
    • Jessica  •  3 mths ago
      Jail:no...citation:sureIts not a big deal obviously, and I'm far, far, far from being a Romney supporter, but I would still be #$%$ if I got glitter in my eye.
    • Nephilim  •  3 mths ago
      Anyone other than 5-12 yr. old girls should be banned from using glitter for anything.
    • TOO OLD  •  3 mths ago
      A lot of Shakespeare here: much ado about nothing.