Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    INFLUENCE GAME: Leaks show group's climate efforts

    WASHINGTON (AP) — Leaked documents from a prominent conservative think tank show how it sought to teach schoolchildren skepticism about global warming and planned other behind-the-scenes tactics using millions of dollars in donations from big corporate names.

    More than $14 million of the money used by the Chicago-based Heartland Institute would come from one anonymous man, according to the leaked documents prepared for a meeting of the group's board.

    Heartland is one of the loudest voices denying man-made global warming, hosting the largest international scientific conference of skeptics on climate change. Several of its documents were leaked this week to the news media, showing the planning and money behind its efforts. Heartland said some of the documents weren't accurate, but declined to be more specific.

    As detailed in the papers, Heartland's plans for this year included paying an Energy Department consultant $100,000 to design a curriculum to teach school children that mainstream global warming science is in dispute, even though it's a fact accepted by the federal government and nearly every scientific professional organization. It also pays prominent global warming skeptics more than $300,000 a year and plans to raise $88,000 to help a former television weatherman set up a new temperature records website.

    "The stolen documents appear to have been written by Heartland's president for a board meeting that took place on Jan. 17," Heartland said in a statement. "The authenticity of those documents has not been confirmed." The institute singled out one of the six documents — claiming to be a summary of efforts on the issue of global warming — as a fake.

    Because Heartland was not specific about what was fake and what was real, The Associated Press attempted to verify independently key parts of separate budget and fundraising documents that were leaked. The federal consultant working on the classroom curriculum, the former TV weatherman, a Chicago elected official who campaigns against hidden local debt and two corporate donors all confirmed to the AP that the sections in the document that pertained to them were accurate. No one the AP contacted said the budget or fundraising documents mentioning them were incorrect.

    David Wojick, a Virginia-based federal database contractor, said in an email that the document was accurate about his project to put curriculum materials in schools that promote climate skepticism.

    "My goal is to help them teach one of the greatest scientific debates in history," Wojick said. "This means teaching both sides of the science, more science, not less."

    Five government and university climate scientists contacted said they were most disturbed by Wojick's project, fearing the teaching would be more propaganda rooted in politics than peer-reviewed science.

    Businesses and other interests often offer free curriculum materials to financially strapped schools, hoping that teachers will use them and help disseminate their views or promote their products.

    Energy Department spokeswoman Jen Stutsman said Wojick's federal work has nothing to do with climate change and that the agency maintains that global warming is real and manmade.

    Heartland also planned to spend $210,000 to help Cook County Treasurer Maria Pappas tour the nation to speak about municipal debt, according to one document. Pappas lost to Barack Obama in the 2004 Democratic primary for a U.S. Senate seat. Pappas confirmed this in a phone interview, saying what Heartland was doing was exposing a "financial tsunami" of municipal debt.

    The leaked document also discusses a new million-dollar Heartland initiative to promote the ability of patients to use experimental drugs that have not yet received federal safety approval, and efforts to support embattled Wisconsin Republican leaders in "Operation Angry Badger." Those parts of the documents were not independently confirmed.

    The documents also show Heartland has raised more than $2 million from large insurance companies and nearly half a million dollars from tobacco interests.

    A person who emailed 15 media and bloggers as "Heartland insider" sent six different documents purporting to be from the libertarian think tank. The insider then killed the email account used to send the documents and could not be reached. Heartland spokesman Jim Lakely would not confirm or deny the claims made in the five documents that he did not call fake.

    The most sensational parts of the documents — and much of what has been confirmed independently — had to do with global warming and efforts to spread doubt into what mainstream scientists are saying. Experts long have thought Heartland and other groups were working to muddy the waters about global warming, said Harry Lambright, a Syracuse University public policy professor who specializes in environment, science and technology issues.

    "Scientifically there is no controversy. Politically, there is a controversy because there are political interest groups making it a controversy," Lambright said. "It's not about science. It's about politics. To some extent they are winning the battle."

    A 2010 study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences surveyed more than 1,300 most cited and published climate scientists and found that 97 percent of them said climate change was a man-made problem. Yet, public opinion polls show far more doubt in the American public.

    An environmental advocacy group, Forecast the Facts, on Thursday started a petition and social media campaign to complain to two of Heartland's corporate donors listed on the documents, Microsoft and General Motors. The two were not the biggest donors; Microsoft donated $69,000 over three years, while the General Motors Foundation gave $45,000. But those are companies that "need to hear from their customers" that they are not happy about promoting climate skepticism, especially after General Motors got a government bailout, campaign director Daniel Souweine said.

    General Motors spokesman Greg Martin said the company's foundation gives money to "a variety of different groups holding a variety of opinions." Microsoft said through its public relations agency that it donates software to 44,000 nonprofits that pass IRS standards, as Heartland does, and that it considers climate change a serious issue.

    The documents showed how heavily Heartland relies on a single person it identified only as "Anonymous Donor." In the past six years, the man has given $14.26 million to the institute, nearly half its $33.9 million in revenue.

    ___

    Online:

    Heartland Institute: http://heartland.org/

    Forecast the Facts campaign against Heartland donors: http://bit.ly/wfd3uY

     
    • Norton Buffalo  •  Calgary, Canada  •  3 mths ago
      All the exaggerated rhetoric and conspiracy theories (on both sides) have turned this issue into a media circus. The real truth probably lies somewhere in the middle. Global warming is a complex issue, scientifically, politically and socially. As an applied scientist, although I have certain profound doubts, I am willing to concede certain portions of the debate to the proponents of AGW:

      1) There does appear to be solid evidence of a significant anomalous warming trend in the earth's atmosphere.
      2) There is evidence (primarily theoretical) that man-made CO2 is a significant contributor to this trend.

      As I can claim no credentials as a "climate scientist" I am willing to accept the scientific "consensus" on this issue (knowing full-well that science-by-consensus is generally ill-advised). Let us assume that science has shown the above points to be absolutely proven. The problem occurs after we accept this "proven" part of the science - the true debate, in a very real sense, is only starting at this point as we now need to address a couple of other concerns of paramount importance:

      3) What will the consequences of global warming be, and are they necessarily all bad?
      4) What, if anything, should we do about it? i.e. are there effective actions that could be taken to limit CO2 emissions that would mitigate global warming? (without causing us more harm than good)

      Unfortunately, this is where the science becomes highly speculative and both political and social factors become significant. I, for one, simply cannot accept that any of the so-called authorities on these questions have definitive answers to these questions.

      My own perspective, as a geologist and engineer, is that climate change (and sometimes, exceedingly rapid climate change) is a natural aspect of the processes occurring on our planet. Even if mankind is responsible for the current climate change, we might do ourselves a favour in the long run by concentrating our resources on adapting to change, rather than assuming the only way to deal with the problem is to focus on CO2 emissions (a simplistic solution scientifically, but very possibly untenable, on a global basis, from a social and political point-of-view).

      And please do not dismiss my opinion as suggesting we should just stick our heads in the sand and continue with current practices - reasonable attempts at reducing fossil fuel consumption are desirable not only because they will reduce pollution (real pollution - CO2 is NOT a pollutant in the toxic sense) and extend our reserves of this precious non-renewable resource, Reducing hydrocarbon consumption also gives us time to develop much-needed alternative energy sources.

      My over-arching point would be that the bulk of the "real" science that has been done would relate to points 1 & 2 above. When we get to 3 & 4, even though the situation may not look very encouraging, we have largely left the "hard" science behind and have entered the province of speculation, especially when it comes to determining effective actions for mitigation of man-made climate change. And I would emphasize again that efforts to conserve hydrocarbons, increase efficiency and promote sustainability are very much worthwhile goals even without taking climate change into account.
      • Howie 3 mths ago
        Science is not done by consensus.
      • Kathe Penthea 3 mths ago
        Perhaps not Howie but he has some very salient points.
      • drew 3 mths ago
        Science is done independently (though you can question funding sources). The scientific/peer review process allows other scientists to poke holes in your science. Once you go through those filters, a published paper is often pretty solid. When 97+ percent of scientists publishing agree that it's real, and human-released CO2 is the main culprit, we should believe it. There is more evidence of this than the existence of God.

        As to what we should do about it, Norton makes some good points, but I think that putting pressure on human activities that produce CO2 (namely burning non-renewable fossil fuels), will push us to a more sustainable, less polluting (NOx, SOx, benzene, and others) and long-term energy source to take us into the coming century(ies).

        Many petroleum geologists and economists are saying that, barring some incredibly large new oil deposit finds, world peak oil production has occurred already (btw, this might be a good reason to use other country's oil before drilling at home...). Anyway. Moving away from petroleum makes sense in so many ways.
    • David  •  Los Angeles, California  •  3 mths ago
      Conservative "think tank" or conservative "scheme tank"?
    • Mike  •  Hampton, Virginia  •  3 mths ago
      Just out of curiosity; why is one man (?) willing to invest over fourteen mil just to shoot down this theory?
      • St. Sassypants 3 mths ago
        Because he expects to earn even more in return. For certain people in the energy business, that's just the price of business.
      • John 3 mths ago
        Because the AGW theory is being used to justify a large government bureaucracy and extra taxes, which he's against. Also, if he's like me, he's annoyed that the AGW theory is a corruption of science that doesn't follow the scientific method. Biased selection of data points, ignoring trends that don't fit the theory....you can prove anything that way. .
      • Martin 3 mths ago
        Ask Al Gore---All the way to the BANK!!!
    • V  •  3 mths ago
      People who grow up dreaming about becoming scientists have far different motivations than people who grow up dreaming about being rich.
      • Jack R 3 mths ago
        And I would say that the richer they are, the more likely they are to deny the reality of AGW.
      • Robert 3 mths ago
        Yeah, you know how those scientists are. Go to college for four years, then four to six of graduate school including working like a slave for a grad student stipend, all to compete with the smartest people on the planet for a postdoc job that pays less than many secretaries make. And never in your life, unless you manage to win a Nobel, do you get a bonus.
      • Jan C 3 mths ago
        But do the scientists have an agenda? I think so. Power and money talk and support them, too.
    • MichaelM  •  3 mths ago
      you should teach children to question everything the government says, that's a responsiblity of Freedom
      • reason4iam 3 mths ago
        Hence the First and Second Amendments. With regards to the freedom of speech and the right to bear arms against your own government lest they cease to become your government.
        .
      • buggrthat 3 mths ago
        Questioning is one thing, lies and propaganda like the think tanks have been producing is something very different.
      • Bellinghamster 3 mths ago
        Our children ARE being taught that global warming is fact...when in point of fact the science is NOT settled. Go int most any classroom and the curriculum doesn't point out that there are questions. The simple fact that a symposium can be held to question the research, much of which is sketchy and politically driven by a ton of money coming fro the left, should give one pause to examine the accepted "truth". People should know that there are legitimate questions. Remember...the Earth was the DEFACTO center of the universe and solar system for centuries. That was the settled science and doctrine of the day until Galileo came along. Elaborate models were made to fit the accepted doctrine....models which we now know to be silly. Crystal sphere anybody?
    • Marcus  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  3 mths ago
      There is nothing wrong with healthy skepticism. Too many people lie to further their own agenda.
      • buggrthat 3 mths ago
        Skepticism is one thing, spinning lies is something else.
      • Turtle 3 mths ago
        This is beyond skepticism. This is a deliberate attempt to promote an agenda without regard to peer-reviewed scientific evidence.
      • mnemon 3 mths ago
        What you say is true, Marcus, but this is actually a case of a group lying to further their own agenda (your words,) not one of healthy skepticism.
    • A_Nonny_Moose  •  3 mths ago
      $300k is an awful lot of money to pay people to say something. Anyone paid that much to speak out about anything is suspect.
    • John  •  Temecula, California  •  3 mths ago
      Keep asking questions, follow the money!
    • JR  •  Denver, Colorado  •  3 mths ago
      Don't confuse me with the facts, I've already made up my mind!
    • Bob  •  3 mths ago
      This article is filled with misrepresentations and outright falsehoods and shows the bias of the writer. There is no incontrovertible evidence that climate change will result in global catastrophe. All there is is suspect data and unreliable and unproven computer models. The global warming hysteria crowd, supported by mainstream media hacks, uses intimidation and unproven scientific theories to push their political agenda on the world. Yes, follow the money. See who benefits from the alarmist agenda. It's the people running the scam.
    • Artisimo2000  •  3 mths ago
      "Businesses and other interests often offer free curriculum materials to financially strapped schools, hoping that teachers will use them and help disseminate their views or promote their products." That is a very bad idea and ought to be illegal. All product promotion in schools should be stopped.
    • bill  •  3 mths ago
      When you must go to such lengths in order to get people on your side of an issue, perhaps your argument lacks merit. Indoctrination is a poor substitute for critical thinking.
    • Jeff in SoCal  •  Seal Beach, California  •  3 mths ago
      "There's no proof smoking causes cancer!"
      Heartland operates just like the tobacco companies used to, hiring their own "experts" and dismissing the overwhelming evidence as suspect.

      If you don't believe human-caused climate change is happening, look at the evidence as I did (degrees in physics and meteorology, by the way). I have no axe to grind. I don't work for the government. I don't have the solution to the problem, but I'm sorry to burst your bubble. Your children will wonder how we could have screwed up their world so badly, as the oceans begin to eat our coastal cities. Soon even the scientifically ignorant will be on board.
    • CarlT  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      This f ing shill 'reporter'... how dare they try to foster skepticism! How dare anyone not follow the Party Line on something!
    • TK3  •  3 mths ago
      Conspire not eh?
    • Stewart  •  Tustin, California  •  3 mths ago
      man-made climate change is real, and natural climate change is real also.
    • Don L  •  Tularosa, New Mexico  •  3 mths ago
      Who is paying Boringstein for his input?
    • gabe  •  New Orleans, Louisiana  •  3 mths ago
      global warming is real........so is global cooling. its gonna get hot and its gonna get cold just like it has from the beginning of time
    • Mike  •  Joplin, Missouri  •  3 mths ago
      Real scientists question EVERYTHING including themselves. A scientist that says something is settled is a propagandist.
    • bobb  •  Indianapolis, Indiana  •  3 mths ago
      I never understood what climate change skeptics really meant when they kept saying "follow the money". Now we finally know what they were talking about. Here I've been earning $60K a year as a scientist doing research when I could have been earning $300K a year telling everyone that the science researchers are wrong.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]