Iran's leader: 2 planes couldn't bring towers down

OK first of all this is totally not edited. If you look carefully (you know who you are) you'll see that the editor forgot to capitalize he says blah blah blah. So if they wouldn't allow him to look at the towers, then why would he be in New York? I know better and I'm in 6th grade.

In a pure coincidence, Gaddafi impeded U.S. oil interests before the war
When the war in Libya began, the U.S. government convinced a large number of war supporters that we were there to achieve the very limited goal of creating a no-fly zone in Benghazi to protect civilians from air attacks, while President Obama specifically vowed that "broadening our military mission to include regime change would be a mistake." This no-fly zone was created in the first week, yet now, almost three months later, the war drags on without any end in sight, and NATO is no longer even hiding what has long been obvious: that its real goal is exactly the one Obama vowed would not be pursued -- regime change through the use of military force. We're in Libya to forcibly remove Gaddafi from power and replace him with a regime that we like better, i.e., one that is more accommodating to the interests of the West. That's not even a debatable proposition at this point.

What I suppose is debatable, in the most generous sense of that term, is our motive in doing this. Why -- at a time when American political leaders feel compelled to advocate politically radioactive budget cuts to reduce the deficit and when polls show Americans solidly and increasingly opposed to the war -- would the U.S. Government continue to spend huge sums of money to fight this war? Why is President Obama willing to endure self-evidently valid accusations -- even from his own Party -- that he's fighting an illegal war by brazenly flouting the requirements for Congressional approval? Why would Defense Secretary Gates risk fissures by so angrily and publicly chiding NATO allies for failing to build more Freedom Bombs to devote to the war? And why would we, to use the President's phrase, "stand idly by" while numerous other regimes -- including our close allies in Bahrain and Yemen and the one in Syria -- engage in attacks on their own people at least as heinous as those threatened by Gaddafi, yet be so devoted to targeting the Libyan leader?

The funniest line in the whole article is... "Ahmadinejad stopped short of saying..." Stopped short?! hahhahahahaha! This writer has a sense of humor!

We can take pictures of indivicual atoms, call people in Antartica, put fresh fruit on the table in the middle of winter, yet the world cannot seem to govern itself and produce responsible leaders on any kind of consistent basis. What a shame.

If the intellectual level showed by most of the posters here accurately reflects the average intelligence of the american people then that nation is finished. Calling for nuclear attacks and assasinations, it would have been funny if it wasn't so #$%$ tragical.

plus didnt someone important say "it is the duty of the American citizen to question their government....." debate is good no?

Sigh. The problem here is that the USG HAS covered up a LOT of things in the past. So, of course the conspiracy theories abound. It's not this particular incident, but things that have happened before that were carried out for policy advocacy. Just look at wikileaks. Look at the threats to Assange. Conspiracy? No, people are openly attacking him.....because he's revealing things we don't want the public to know.

United states needs to worry about there own selves stop sending money when usa is already broke ......25 million jobs went to foreign countries , usa companies are traitors , sold there own country out for foreign countries ,nafta was a huge mistake .,thanks clinton , for nothing

Gather your own information and make your own informed decisions.

Oh yes it was one of our presidents....a long time ago when democracy actually was a good idea and worked for the most part

just wondering something on the inside job thing and the planted explosives. first ive seen them set up buildings for demolition , they go in cut the steel beams and plant explosives takes like weeks to set this up, and nobody saw them doing this? next they say it fell faster than gravity, how is that possible if u blow something up wouldnt it go up first then down at the speed of gravity?

That's 100% true , united states has helped more foreign countries with aid ( money ) , i don't see foreign countries help united states , know do we ???? Remember usa is broke , we need to stop helping foreign countries and take care of our own backyard. 25 million people are out of a job .........which all the foreign countries has , our jobs .

The protest gone wrong was the catalyst that brought us into Libya. around 200 deaths... since we began our intervention in Libya, there have been more than 3,000 civilian deaths since. NATO bombers are directly responsible for more or less 10-20% of those deaths. more than 200 I believe...

Loose change?

It's amazing to me that people believe the government can't do anything right, yet believe the government is capable of these ultra-intricate mega-conspiraces.

correct me if I am mistaken...I am new to this

Everybody wants to rule the world.

you can not fight terrorism people...but you can prevent it. there is a big difference between the people who staged the 911 attack and a school shooter.

HA! Even George Noory, Art Bell, Whitley Strieber and Ian Punnett are Laughing at this mope.

So, what did he know and when did he know it?