Jurors: Evidence in John Edwards case fell short

Associated Press
John Edwards, second from left, speaks outside a federal courthouse as his daughter Cate Edwards, left, and parents Wallace Edwards, second from right, and Bobbie Edwards, right, look on after the jury's verdict in his trial on charges of campaign corruption in Greensboro, N.C., Thursday, May 31, 2012. (AP Photo/Chuck Burton)
.

View gallery

GREENSBORO, N.C. (AP) — Some of the jurors from the John Edwards case that ended in mistrial say there just wasn't enough evidence to convict him of campaign finance violations.

Six of the jurors went on network talk shows Friday, a day after acquitting the former presidential candidate on one count and failing to reach a verdict on five other charges.

Prosecutors had charged Edwards with misusing campaign contributions from two wealthy donors to hide his pregnant mistress while he ran for the White House.

Cindy Aquaro said on NBC's "Today" show that she thought Edwards was guilty of at least some counts. But she said he was smart enough to hide it and they couldn't find proof.

Another juror, Theresa Fuller, told ABC's "Good Morning America" the evidence just wasn't there.

View Comments (1)