A Look at World Leaders' Opinions on Iran Military Strike

Let me see... hmmmmm, we are the warmakers! In 1980 we were invaded by Saddam and fought him alone! Not a couple of Japanese pilots over one of our shores. The whole Saddam army backed by US, France, Germany, Russia and after 82 even Israel, and we fought him alongside of our borders, buddy. And not for 1 or 2 days but for 8 years. In 1988 the lovely USS Vincennes shot down our Flight over Persian Gulf. Just a question: When exactly were "our" citizen patriots willing to stand watch or take the fight to the enenemy first?

Thanks

It is a difficult situation. A military strike may postpone the Iranian effort but they will not stop. Unfortunately, the Iranian people are in a bad spot. They don't like the oppressive regime but are powerless.

You know... I wonder why it's always Americas fault... Why don't the Arab League bomb the #$%$ out of Iran... What did the Saudi King say to us... Cut off the head of the snake... Time for the Arab League to police it self in the Middle East and cut off the head of the snake...

Sarkozy "cannot bear" Netanyahoo, oh dear, still hilarious! Does this make him anti-semetic?

All crazy warmongers who want to go to war with Iran should be armed and sent over. Do not send anyone else to die for your stupid wars.

Shame they just can't fight it out on a battlefield..Let them both blow each other up...I could care less,not being Muslim Nor Jewish...To be honest,I do not wanna pay $10.00 for a Gal. of gas,If Iran is attacked,oil goes to $250 a barrel (White House source) any way ya slice it..

This is not North Korea. NK was likely guided and encouraged by China for the purpose of increasing chinese strategic defense. As such, China will keep NK on a leash as any nuclear action by their government would by proxy effect China substantially. Iran on the other hand has the worlds 17th largest population (75 MIL) and no counterpart to restrain them. Their leadership is unbalanced, brutal, and has been actively supporting anti U.S. fighters in Iraq and Afghanistan. We have effectively already been in a small war with Iran for the last several years and the deaths of American servicemen and women can be directly tied to these actions. This would not be the same as a war with Iraq or Afghanistan. Combined their populations were still 20 million less than that of Iran. While I believe that Irans initial use of nuclear weapons would be for deterrence; religious zealots in their country could easily use nuclear waste to create and move a dirty bomb into Europe or the U.S. Make no mistake this is a very dangerous game and if Iran is allowed to build these types of weapons then rest assured that other very rich interested parties (EX:Saudi Arabi) with much less stable leadership (This is the family that produced UBL) will aquire it shortly. Our leadership seems fit to (like our financial situation at the moment) delay fixing the problem because it may hurt their future election possibilities. Well ........just like the economic deficit, someday the bill will come due and then what?

Appeasing Iran will not work. They don't care about civilian casualties.. (they killed their own pretty readily in the past). They care only about carrying out what they feel is their duty to Islam... and that is destroying Isreal. Everything they are doing now is a smokescreen while they prepare their nuclear weapons. They complain loudly hoping to get time to complete their goal.

Non of those world leaders matter. When the oil controlling Gulf Sunni Arab states sign on to taking out Iran's growing threat to the balance of power in the region there will be war. It's that simple.

Maybe the Russians have something up their sleeves to stop Iran's program when needed...Stuxnet sure sounds similar to Sputnik!

When Muslims say they are "a religion of peace", why does it feel like A WOLF IS LICKING MY HAND????????????????
We need to strike them FIRST, and wipe them out..... Only ZERO tolerence towards Muslim Terrorists works.

And Admiral Sporky McCrackin said: Who gives a crap about the ramifications of an attack or how many people die. They have our oil and we need it so lets get on with it.

These articles are all meant to groom the public and prepare them for what they see as an inevitable battle. And still liberals slumber on thinking that they are anti-war. Wake up fools, this blood is on your hands. Anyone calling me a conservative - well thank you for making the world a dum-ber place.

World Leaders: Club of handful of bullies. Western leaders cannot get in power, until they prove their full obedience to Zio lobby. And if they DARE criticize Israel, they'll lose their job! So pathetic, sad and humiliating... "Leaders of Free World"

I've heard refence to the U.S.A. as the most powerfull , the greatest , the strongest country in the history of the world. I've heard it from presidents and other top positions in the U.S. Even when i was much younger , President Bush Senior, not junior used to turn my stomach when he used most powerfull and greatest in referance to my country. Well now don't they set a fine example. Maybe these third world country's who were powerfull way back when , have decided they want some of that self respect. They want weapons of mass destruction too.
Thanks alot George and the rest of the power mongers who have provoked the arms buildup.

remember when the world courted Hitler, and believed he would'nt attack Czech, Poland, France, etc. They have made their intentions clear. Find some balls and deal with them. GO ISRAEL!!!

If the rest of the women they call kings and princes from those Arab gulf states would stop hiding under their wives skirts and challenge Iran along with the rest of the free world maybe it might change the behavior of the Iranian leadership. Saudi Arabia and the other gulf states are desperately afraid of a nuclear armed Iran but want the U.S. or Israel to do the dirty deed. This calls for a concerted, combined effort. Countries like Russia and China have too many economic interests with Iran and really enjoy the aggravation it causes the U.S. They also know an Iranian nuclear warhead won't be pointed at them.

thier going to get nukes no matter what we do short of invading, so lets plan like they do and target all thier cities,let them know it and give israel the missle to take them out also

Supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenie warned there would be serious repercussions.
No more pistacios for you!!

not a whole lot of world leaders speaking up. Gates is not a world leader, but should be. Gates for President 2012. An intelligent and knowledgeable man of sound judgement and humanitarian prinicples.