Mark Levin: Ron Paul’s interpretation of the Constitution not always accurate [VIDEO]

Most of our elected officials, of both parties, in DC are DeceptiCons. They represent the big corporations and large special interest donors, not the people that thought that they were electing them.

Bain Capital Owns Clear Channel (Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, Michael Savage, Etc.)

Wouldn’t it be great if a Republican presidential candidate could just buy the support of just about every major conservative talk show host in America? Well, it may not be as far-fetched as you may think.

Clear Channel owns more radio stations (850) than anyone else in the United States. They also own Premiere Radio Networks, the company that syndicates the radio shows of Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck, among others. Needless to say, Clear Channel basically owns conservative talk radio in the United States.

So who owns Clear Channel? Well, it turns out that Bain Capital is one of the primary owners of Clear Channel. Yes, you read that correctly. The company that Mitt Romney ran for so long is one of the “big bosses” over virtually all conservative talk radio in America.

Of course Mitt Romney is not running Bain Capital anymore. He is a “retired partner”, but he still has a huge financial stake in Bain Capital. We’re talking about millions upon millions of dollars. If you doubt this, just check out page 34 of this public financial disclosure report.

opensecrets. org/pfds/pfd2006/N00000286_2006_Pres. pdf

(Take the 2 spaces out of the link)

So if you have been wondering why so many conservative talk show hosts are being so incredibly kind to Mitt Romney, this just might be the answer.

The article title is misleading because it never explained why Ron Paul's interpretation of the Constitution is inaccurate.

Levin mentions traditional conservative foreign policy and names Taft, Reagan, Goldwater, and others, and then states that the last time he checked, Abe Lincoln was "Mr. Republican".
Yet, the creator and first member of the original Republican Party and therefore, the real "Mr. Republican", was Thomas Jefferson, whose own foreign policy advised...Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations...entangling alliances with none.

Regardless, I would rather have a president that knows we have a constitution.

“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.”
--Patrick Henry

If LEVIN interprets it in any way that contradicts the above, then LEVIN has it wrong.

And I care what a radio talk show host has to say why?

And when does a " radio talk show host " become a constitutional scholar?

Levin good friend of Hannity. nuf said.

Ron Paul has a different opinion of the constitution ....yeah....so do 310 million americans....even the 9 top judges cant always agree ....but we like his view ....so what if we quit protecting the world ...we're broke!! I am sure Ron Paul would support troops in Japan if they paid the true costs of keeping them there as "insurance" ....or in south korea...or mideast....Paul in 2012

he'd vote for Santorum...his opinion doesn't matter now.

Have any of you actually listened to this guy's show? It's disgusting. This guy is a jerk.

Mark Levine interpretations are for sale to the highest bidder.

These people aren't real republicans, they are chickenhawk warmongers, and they have sleazy little shills like Levin trying to spin everything. If this little Levin turd wants a war with Iran then we can outfit him with a M-16 and dump his behind in the desert with Rush, Hannity, and Beck and they can go ahead and invade Iran. Stop killing my brothers with your wars.

"I don't believe in secession"? Does this guy have any idea what the Constitution is? Or why the civil war was fought? Or better yet why the South seceded from the Union? Does anyone read anymore? What's most disturbing is that people will actually base their views off of what he says and he seems completely off base as far as his ideas of the Constitution and secession.

Who is Mark Levine??

Mark Levin ; who is in my opinion a NeoCon ,who would not vote for Ron Paul because Ron Paul is against Foreign Aid and against fighting wars for other countries. We invaded Iraq for israel, something Ron Paul never would have done.

Ron Paul still has my vote.

How is Dr. Paul's view inaccurate??? Explain! What a P.O.S. article.

Statement from Sen. Tom Davis

“It’s easy to campaign on lower taxes, less spending and fewer regulations – it’s another thing entirely to stand up for these limited government principles when the entire Washington establishment is aligned against you. Yet for more than three decades Ron Paul has cast thousands of lonely votes in our nation’s capital based on the constitutional principles that this country was founded on – and that the Republican Party has promised to protect. Yet while generations of politicians – including far too many Republicans – were losing their way or caving to the status quo, Ron Paul was standing as a Tea Party of one against a towering wave of red ink.

“2012 marks the fifth consecutive year in which the federal government is going to spend well over $1 trillion in money it doesn’t have. Each and every American taxpayer is now on the hook for $135,000 worth of federal debt – and last year’s debt deal adds another $7 trillion in deficit spending over the coming decade. Meanwhile the U.S. Senate hasn’t passed a budget in nearly 1,000 days.

“I’m endorsing Ron Paul because enough is enough. Despite this wave of unprecedented government spending, our unemployment rate has remained above 8 percent for the last 34 months and 146.4 million Americans – one out of every two people in this country – are now classified as poor or low-income.

“Government activism and government intervention clearly hasn’t fixed our economy – which is why the Republican Party needs a nominee who isn’t wedded to that failed approach. We won’t chart a path to fiscal solvency or victory in November by running toward the failed ideas of the left – we will achieve those victories by returning to the principles that the Republican Party once stood for.

“That is why I am proud to endorse Ron Paul for president.

“Ron Paul’s record matches his rhetoric, his fiscal plan matches the fiscal challenges that our nation is facing and his movement represents the taxpayers whose interests have been ignored in the political process for far too long.

“I’m also endorsing him because unlike what the pundits have led you to believe, he is the candidate who gives the Republican Party the best chance to beat Barack Obama in November.

“We have a choice: We can keep electing candidates who talk about change only during political campaigns as a way to get elected, or we can finally elect a candidate who will walk the walk and make that change a reality – restoring our bottom line, our individual liberties and our national pride in the process.”