Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Medication helps some with mild depression

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - People with mild depression may benefit from taking antidepressants, suggests a new analysis of past studies that compared symptoms in people on the drugs to those given drug-free placebo pills.

    Some earlier reports had suggested that antidepressants generally only improve mood in people with severe depression.

    But that might be because those studies weren't precise enough to pick up on smaller changes in symptoms that can still make a difference for people with milder forms of the disease, researchers said.

    "I think there's a valid concern... that if someone has not-that-severe depression that hasn't lasted that long, maybe it will get better itself or with therapy," said Dr. David Hellerstein, from the New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, who worked on the study.

    Still, he said the question of whether or not to prescribe medication shouldn't necessarily come down to how severe the depression is, but how long symptoms have lasted.

    People with "transient depression" that will improve with diet or exercise or after a few weeks of therapy "shouldn't be taking the risk of being on meds," he told Reuters Health.

    "But people who have more persistent depression should be evaluated for treatment and medicine should be one of the options," even when the depression is more modest.

    Hellerstein and his colleagues collected data from six studies done at the state's psychiatric institute between 1985 and 2000. Those included 825 people with non-severe, long-lasting depression enrolled in trials that compared symptoms with antidepressant treatment versus a placebo.

    In three of the six studies, patients taking an antidepressant improved more on a widely-used scale of depression symptoms and severity than those taking a placebo, and in four studies, a higher percentage of patients taking antidepressants went into remission, meaning they were no longer considered to have clinically-significant depression.

    Depending on the particular drug and study, the researchers calculated that between three and eight people with non-severe depression would have to be treated with an antidepressant for one to benefit substantially from it.

    That, they wrote in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, is "a range considered by researchers as sufficiently robust to recommend treatment."

    The drugs tested in those studies included Prozac, as well as older and now less-popular medications known as monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic and tetracyclic antidepressants. It's hard to know how well the findings would apply for newer antidepressants, the researchers said.

    The results don't mean that everyone with mild depression should be on an antidepressant, a psychiatrist not involved in the study pointed out.

    "People with these milder depressions also respond well to counseling and psychotherapy and can respond well to exercise," said Dr. Michael Thase, from the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine in Philadelphia.

    "This is basically saying, these antidepressants aren't that good, and you should also consider other treatment options and don't just focus on the thing that's the easiest," he told Reuters Health.

    The researchers said that some combination of antidepressants and talk therapy is considered most effective in depression treatment -- but getting therapy is often more expensive and time-consuming than medication.

    Talk therapy can run $100 or more per session, while generic brands of antidepressants usually cost about $20 per month. Drugs may come with side effects, including insomnia and stomach aches, but they're usually minor, according to Hellerstein.

    Still, people on antidepressants should be followed closely by a doctor to see how they're responding to treatment, he said.

    Several of the authors of the current study reported having received funding for other research projects from drug companies that make antidepressants.

    One recent study found that some depressed people on the antidepressant Cymbalta did worse than the comparison placebo group -- but the majority got some benefit (see Reuters Health story of December 9, 2011).

    "I believe the basic finding that drugs are more effective than placebo," Thase said.

    But, "The benefits of antidepressants may not be that dramatic in patients with milder depressions for whom many other (non-drug) strategies can also be considered."

    SOURCE: http://bit.ly/yVBEdk Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, online December 27, 2011.

     

    15 comments

    • A Yahoo! User  •  26 days ago
      Depression is a deep dark place that is something people can not understand unless they have been there.
    • ILuvCats  •  25 days ago
      These studies are almost always bogus, because most patients in the study, and virtually all doctors, quickly figure out who is on the active drug, and who is on the placebo. Research on study design proved this. The patients who are not getting better drop out of the study, and are not figured in the final results, thus inflating the statistics of those "helped" by the drugs.
    • James M  •  26 days ago
      Generics may be $20 but quacks give what the drug reps push. Many folks end up feeling worse from the drugs so more drugs get stacked on and they run up $400-600 a month with no real benefits and no end in sight.
    • ILuvCats  •  25 days ago
      OF COURSE they leave off the very common side effect of antidepressants that routinely upsets people, which is sexual dysfunction.
    • Smitty  •  23 days ago
      Like all drugs, SSRI's and SSNRI's are probably wonderful for people who both need and tolerate them, but not so good for those who don't.
    • MikeyPooh  •  Surfside, California  •  27 days ago
      serotonin isn't inherently happy or sad. insects use it for pain. boosting it will just make you more emotional, for better or worse. you still have to start making positive changes in your life, if you're doing that while feeling more emotional you might get happier. but if you take the pill sit on your butt staring at the wall saying "life sucks" it probably will continue to suck and maybe even get worse. exercise does more than SSRI's.
    • ROB  •  25 days ago
      Not to mention some of the meds can make one suicidal . . .
    • GodBlessAmerica2  •  Little Rock, Arkansas  •  25 days ago
      You're kidding me. They just figured this out?
    • beowulf  •  25 days ago
      Exercise is a better treatment than any medication that may be prescribed to anyone suffering from this ailment.

      Fact: Prozac is 94% fluoride.. a neuro toxin which is also found in many rat poisons.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  24 days ago
      Hum, I had the 'joy' of trying several different antidepressants for a pain related issue. I was well over 25 & all the meds made me depressed (some more than others.) I'm glad when these meds help others, but that black box warning should say "Some People" not just "Young People."
    • what  •  Washington, District of Columbia  •  26 days ago
      In my case meds help but I have serious depression. If you want to learn more please read Life of Death by George Mason. Some folks get meds for the blues or for some recent emotional event. Meds are for biological problems not environmental problems.
    • Jon  •  Selinsgrove, Pennsylvania  •  25 days ago
      Marijuana helps destroy the symptoms of depression.
    • SHOCKKA  •  27 days ago
      I was able to curtail 4 different pills I was taking 3 times a day with medical marijuana. My life has never been better.
    • Nevada  •  Miami, Florida  •  25 days ago
      Lets take a second to let this sink inn, since religious people obviously are severely mentally challenged, how schould we treat them? schould we classify them as mentally handicapped? give them special education in childhood etc Or schould we treat them with the utmost disrespect, scorn them like the infectious festering cancer that they are?It is common knowledge that religious people are less intelligent than those who aren't religious. Religious people blindly follow what they are told by their holy book and or church. countless studies prove time and again that that dumb people are attracted to religions. . Our real purpose is to fit ourselves to be of maximum service to God... The Big Book, 3rd Edition, William G. Wilson, page 77. History and science have shown us that the existence of the disease of alcoholism is pure speculation. Just saying alcoholism is a disease, doesn't make it true. Nevertheless, medical professionals and American culture lovingly embraced the disease concept and quickly applied it to every possible deviant behavior from alcohol abuse to compulsive lecturing. The disease concept was a panacea for many failing medical institutions adding billions of dollars to the industry and leading to a prompt evolution of pop-psychology. Research has shown that alcoholism is a choice, not a disease, and stripping alcohol abusers of their choice, by applying the disease concept, is a threat to the health of the individual.

      The disease concept oozes into every crevice of our society perpetuating harmful misinformation that hurts the very people it was intended to help. It is a backwards situation where the assumptions of a few were adopted as fact by the medical profession, devoid of supporting evidence. And soon after, the disease concept was accepted by the general public. With this said, visiting the history of the disease concept gives us all a better understanding of how and why all of this happened.

      The disease concept originated in the 1800s with a fellow by the name of Dr. Benjamin Rush. He believed alcoholics were diseased and used the idea to promote his prohibitionist political platform. He also believed that dishonesty, political dissention and being of African-American decent were diseases. The "disease concept" was used throughout the late 1800s and early 1900s by prohibitionists and those involved in the Temperance Movement to further a political agenda. Prior to this time, the term alcoholic did not exist.
    • Nevada  •  Miami, Florida  •  25 days ago
      Of course AA is a cult! AA is not only a religious cult, it is a radical cult, an evil cult, a widespread cult, and a dangerous cult. AA has become an engine of social decay posing as a noble, altruistic fellowship. Its perverse philosophy of sin-disease and deliverance by faith in a heterogeneous deity contradicts the fundamental values of a free society, but is uniquely appealing to people addicted to substance-pleasure. AA is a cancer on the soul of the nation, producing no pain to the populace as it eats away at the foundation of society. Its victims are its members who become grateful to their captors. AA is causing the problem is says it helps. Its 12-step program suggests nothing on how to quit an addiction except to stop trying, and its members love the cult more than any newcomer. Each cult member shares a vision of a better world resulting from propagating the steps -- not from the effects of abstinence upon society. The AA cult has infiltrated our federal and state bureaucracies and now nests in every social institution, setting policies that funnel new members into its craw. It expands for its own sake, and cannot change from within. Therefore, it must be destroyed by forthright public education and expose.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...