Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Missouri lawmakers repeal teacher-Facebook law

    JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — Missouri lawmakers voted overwhelmingly Friday to repeal part of a contentious new law that had prohibited teachers from chatting privately with students over Internet sites such as Facebook.

    If the repeal is signed by Gov. Jay Nixon, Missouri's law restricting online communications would instead be replaced with a new requirement for public school districts to develop their own policies on the use of electronic media between employees and students.

    "It puts things back into the hands of the school districts," said Todd Fuller, a spokesman for the Missouri State Teachers Association, which had challenged Missouri's law in court.

    A Cole County judge issued a preliminary injunction placing Missouri's law on hold shortly before it was to take effect Aug. 28, declaring that "the breadth of the prohibition is staggering" and the law "would have a chilling effect" on free-speech rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.

    Shortly after the judge's order, Nixon added the online communications law to the agenda of a special session that began Sept. 6. Nixon's written message to lawmakers specifically limited them to repealing the law — not replacing it with new wording, as they did.

    The Missouri Constitution gives the governor the authority to determine which matters lawmakers can consider during extraordinary sessions. But lawmakers contend that does not mean the governor can limit how legislators act on those matters — for example, by restricting them only to repealing a section of law instead of amending it.

    Lawmakers removed the original law's most publicly controversial provision, which barred teachers from using websites that allow "exclusive access" with current students or former students who are 18 or younger, such as occurs with private messages on Facebook. But the repeal went a step further by also requiring public school districts to adopt policies by March 1 on employee-student communications, including "the use of electronic media," in order "to prevent improper communications."

    The House passed the legislation to repeal and replace the law by a 139-2 vote. The Senate passed it 33-0 earlier this month.

    "When we make errors we need to fix them, and that's what we're doing here today," said Rep. Chris Kelly, a Democrat from Columbia.

    The original provisions about Internet communications had been included in a broader law enacted earlier this year that sought to stop school personnel who have sexually abused students from quietly resigning and getting hired by other districts. That law requires schools to share information with other districts about teachers who have sexually abused students and allows lawsuits in cases where districts fail to disclose such information and teachers later abuse someone else. Those provisions of the law were not challenged in court and were not part of the repeal considered during the special session.

    There was little debate about the online communications section of the legislation when it passed this spring. But afterward, confusion and concerns began to mount among some teachers about whether they could be barred from using Facebook. Other teachers feared the law also could have had implications for online courses, which may be configured to allow limited access only by teachers and students.

    "It became easy to call this a Facebook bill, but it was bigger than that," Fuller said. "It was more, 'we're using a form of social media in the classroom right now that we're not sure if we can continue to use.'"

    The only two House members to vote against the repeal Friday were Republican Jay Barnes of Jefferson City and Democrat Mike Colona of St. Louis. Both are attorneys. And both suggested that local school districts could end up adopting policies that still infringe on free speech, essentially multiplying the lawsuits that could be filed.

    "We just traded one big unconstitutional ball of wax for 529 little balls of wax," Barnes said.

     

    24 comments

    • Alkebu Barca  •  8 mths ago
      It wasn't a well thought out law in the first place.....
    • Robert  •  8 mths ago
      If the American culture contained any type of pride or sense of responsibility, the clowns who proposed and voted for this ridiculous law would resign in shame.
      • Michael Barton 8 mths ago
        I think they wanted an easy way to solve 1 of their problems. And historically, the easiest way to solve a problem is to blindly ban the problem. They, the education system & government, have done this before and they'll do it again.
    • Charles  •  8 mths ago
      Buying from COMMUNIST China is "trading with the enemy," That used to be called treason.
      • real athlete 8 mths ago
        Bush Sr. changed all that by giving China MFN - Most Favored Nation trading status.
        Bush Jr. multiplied that by offering tax credits for outsourcing by calling it "foreign development", because he felt America must do its part to invest in the third world no matter how many jobs were lost in America.
    • NONYA  •  8 mths ago
      Based on law and accessibility to communications devices, parents ALWAYS have control over their kids and these devices. You can not commit a double entandre of the law, and make the parent responsible for what the kid does, then give the kid right to parental privacy.

      At some point, there will eventually be criminal actions to a degree brought against kids who solicit relationship affection from teachers in an unnatural way, because your laws have already held them responsible in equally complex situations.

      If a 17 year old solicits a relationship with a teacher and you charge the teacher with a crime, there is no way in the world that you can convince me that the 17 year old had no clue what they were doing, no thoughts about consequence, made consious decisions they kept secret, was a willing participant, etc. I can see a difference if it was adult and elementary, but when i was in high school, i can remember popular physically matured girls talking about trying to get with a male faculty member or two. I criminal charge both ways will limit this type of action.
    • eggman  •  8 mths ago
      The way it is going it won't be long till the people have no rights at all. They just strip them one by one. It's just a matter of time and the guns will go, then the knife, rocks baseball bat,
      20 years from now the American people won't have any rights at all unless we stand up against this becoming communist government.
    • Edmarc  •  8 mths ago
      I would have told them where to go before it even got off the ground.
    • NONYA  •  8 mths ago
      Based on law and accessibility to communications devices, parents ALWAYS have control over their kids and these devices. You can not commit a double entandre of the law, and make the parent responsible for what the kid does, then give the kid right to parental privacy.

      At some point, there will eventually be criminal actions to a degree brought against kids who solicit relationship affection from teachers in an unnatural way, because your laws have already held them responsible in equally complex situations.

      If a 17 year old solicits a relationship with a teacher and you charge the teacher with a crime, there is no way in the world that you can convince me that the 17 year old had no clue what they were doing, no thoughts about consequence, made consious decisions they kept secret, was a willing participant, etc. I can see a difference if it was adult and elementary, but when i was in high school, i can remember popular physically matured girls talking about trying to get with a male faculty member or two. I criminal charge both ways will limit this type of action.
    • Charles  •  8 mths ago
      Hey Loonies.... call Obama a communist and then go out to WalMart and buy
      CHEAP COMMUNIST CHINA stuff. Who is a commie now?
    • NONYA  •  8 mths ago
      Based on law and accessibility to communications devices, parents ALWAYS have control over their kids and these devices. You can not commit a double entandre of the law, and make the parent responsible for what the kid does, then give the kid right to parental privacy.

      At some point, there will eventually be criminal actions to a degree brought against kids who solicit relationship affection from teachers in an unnatural way, because your laws have already held them responsible in equally complex situations.

      If a 17 year old solicits a relationship with a teacher and you charge the teacher with a crime, there is no way in the world that you can convince me that the 17 year old had no clue what they were doing, no thoughts about consequence, made consious decisions they kept secret, was a willing participant, etc. I can see a difference if it was adult and elementary, but when i was in high school, i can remember popular physically matured girls talking about trying to get with a male faculty member or two. I criminal charge both ways will limit this type of action.
    • warhrse  •  8 mths ago
      Sounds like this project needs some planning. Still in a rapidly changing world we are loath to shut down things that may not yet exist.
    • stirring the pot  •  8 mths ago
      Less regulation
    • Rob  •  8 mths ago
      I thought that part WAS the whole law. What does the rest of the law say?
    • Jenji dancin' barefoo ...  •  8 mths ago
      I have two teachers that I like chat with or e-mail off hours and during vacation and stuff, but it's like personal e-mail not Facebook. I don't think it's anybody's business as long as it's not school hours or using their computers or anything – just part of trying to control everyone's life. School districts are bad for that, like suspending kids for sexting when it has nothing to do with school time or property on their own personal cell phones.
    • Life Happens  •  8 mths ago
      A public school teachers job ends when the final bell rings for the day. It's the parents job to take over from there when it comes to helping the kid with homework and such.
      • Bradley America 8 mths ago
        The I wouldn't trust the average US citizen to help a kid with homework.
      • Jerry 8 mths ago
        Did you know there are still some parents that are not educated enough to help their kids with home work? I have seen ads on craigslist of students asking for help with home work. Too poor for tutor also if you were going to go there..
      • Paul 8 mths ago
        No, their job doesn't end when the bell rings. They have papers and tests to grade, parent-teacher conferences, meetings with the administration, and sports to coach (if they're doing that).

        Teaching isn't an 8-to-5 job.
    • EdW  •  8 mths ago
      The reason for the law was to prevent improper relationships between teachers and students, which happens far too often. If they want to communicate via internet, they can talk to the parents.
      • Steve 8 mths ago
        If the parents were involved in the first place then additional forms of communication would never have been needed.
    • Charles  •  8 mths ago
      Grade and hi school teachers are heros! However, because every bonehead thinks they should tell teachers how and what to teach, teachers now just have to duck their heads and become info robots.

      Want to fix the schools? Pay in-classroom teachers min of $200,000 per yr and add a cost of living percentage for expensive places to live. Paying teachers what they are worth raises their status to the point of power to really do their job and it also will bring in men with the balls to tell parents their kids are brats and administrators to get out of the way.

      What are we talking about? Answer OUR CHILDREN, not a $7. frappe at Coffee Buzz shop.
    • LtVernonJr  •  8 mths ago
      If I find out some slimeball teacher is talking to my daughter, I don't need a law! I'll knock on the ratty door of his 2 bedroom apartment just outside the ghetto and call him out for a little talk!!
      • Rob 8 mths ago
        Go get 'em ITG.
      • Paul 8 mths ago
        And spend 20 years in prison for assault, leaving your daughter without a father.
      • Ken 8 mths ago
        maybe probation.....but seems it would be worth it......If a dog bites my kid I'ld kill it with a pocket knife or a rock right there......if the owner objected he might get stoned as well....
        protect your own from anything........
    • omtatsat  •  8 mths ago
      Taking away our freedom daily..thanks obama..mr.nazi !
    • BigDaddy  •  8 mths ago
      Why do college educated people not understand that their right to free speech was being challenged here? We are not in a communist country yet, although we have many fine communists we call Obama lovers. In a free society, people have to make a mistake before they can be punished. This law is has the effect of threatening teachers and their communications without having done anything wrong. I find that just plain iggnorant.
    • stirandsavor  •  8 mths ago
      so now teachers will have more tools to indoctrinate and propagandize their students, hey I got thru school without teachers communicating with me in any shape or form except in the classroom, well maybe we don't need classrooms now, is that what their saying? That would be wonderful, one superior teacher can teach 10,000 kids, better than having 1000 teachers who can't communicate let along attempt to teach in public schools.. PS How many schools have video cameras in every classroom along with mics....? none
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...