Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Mitt Romney's 'embarrassing' 15 percent tax rate confession

    The GOP frontrunner finally acknowledges that he pays Uncle Sam a relatively small share of his relatively high income. Will it hurt him with voters?

    Mitt Romney is a very wealthy man — his campaign puts the former venture capitalist's fortune at between $190 million and $250 million — who pays a relatively low tax rate. On Tuesday, after fending off months of questions about his taxes, Romney finally disclosed that the amount he pays in federal taxes is "probably closer to the 15 percent rate than anything." The nominal top tax rate is 35 percent, and households earning $50,000 to $75,000 a year pay about 16.5 percent. Romney is able to claim the 15 percent rate for capital gains (investment income) because much of his income comes from "carried interest" — his share of the profits that his old private equity firm, Bain Capital, earns from managing other people's money. Romney also earns money from speaking fees — though he characterized the six-digit amount as "not very much." The GOP presidential frontrunner says he'll release his 2011 tax returns in April. Will this "embarrassing" tax confession hurt Romney?

    This is devastating for Romney: "The politics of this are awful for the GOP frontrunner," says Steve Benen at Washington Monthly. While middle-class families struggle through a tough recession, most are paying a higher tax rate than the multi-millionaire "who got rich laying people off." Oh, and that "not very much" Romney earned in speaking fees? More than $362,000 last year alone. "For a candidate already accused of being an out-of-touch elitist... this is clearly another 'uh oh' moment."
    "Quote of the day"

    But the tax code isn't Mitt's fault: I don't get the "obsession with Mitt Romney's tax returns," says Tina Korbe at Hot Air. Yes, he's rich. But he's not a tax evader, and "honestly, it's highly rational of him — and of any member of the ultra-rich — to obey the incentives created by the tax code." It's not like he invented his own loophole. Republicans know that Romney is a "flawed candidate," but now that he's ripped this tax band-aid off, can we at least "return to the real issues"?
    "Romney says he 'probably' pays about 15 percent in taxes"

    If he's smart, Romney can turn this to his advantage: The cat is already out of the bag, says The Wall Street Journal in an editorial, and whatever Romney does now, Team Obama will use Mitt's tax break to hammer the Republican as "a morally obtuse fat cat who doesn't understand the problems of average Americans." If Romney doesn't want to spend the next 11 months defending his 15 percent rate, he should seize this moment to "make the moral and practical case for lower rates and fewer loopholes" for everyone.
    "Mitt Romney's 15 percent"

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     
    • RichardinMD  •  Baltimore, Maryland  •  4 mths ago
      how many pay more in taxes then we HAVE TO?
      Many of our Govt officials in BOTH PARTIES have actually evaded paying their taxes. If either side really think those who are well off, are not paying enough taxes then CHANGE the TAX CODE. They won't do this because they also are well off! they are just using this so you will vote for them so THEY can bend you over instead of the other guy bending you over.
      • James 4 mths ago
        Which income group do you think has the most influence on how the tax laws are written?
      • RichardinMD 4 mths ago
        as i said, the well off. obama made over 5 million in 2009 and 2010 so i doubt that he is not wealthy!
    • J  •  4 mths ago
      I'm no mitt rino fan by any stretch, but why is it embarrassing? It just means he's a savvy investor with a good accountant. If I paid more than 15%, I would fire my accountant.
      • Jerry Downs 4 mths ago
        What it means is---i pay 13% more than he does.
      • M 4 mths ago
        What it means is, yes, he's rich, and as long as he's not hiding money offshore, he's paying what he legally owes. As one person.

        But what it also means is that our tax code is totally messed up. The rich pay a tiny fraction of their excess money (probably what they fish out of the couch cushions), while the rest of us pay a huge chunk of our means.

        THAT'S what's wrong. He is following the law, but the law needs changing.
      • robert s 4 mths ago
        That's right, he lives on his capital gains, not on income from a job. This is the biggest problem taxing the rich, they don't earn any money, because they don't need to work...da.
    • Debbie  •  Everett, Washington  •  4 mths ago
      Working class people, like me, usually have their investments in 401Ks...and when you retire you will pay the INCOME RATE, not the INVESTMENT RATE on your funds !
      • Sunshine Connie 4 mths ago
        Save outside of your 401k and then you too can lower your effective tax rate. I did that and I am not uber wealthy. I worked for an average wage.
      • Debbie 4 mths ago
        True, I did also, but I still believe that income is income and should be taxed as such! No special rate for Corporate Raiders and Hedge Fund Managers !!!
      • we're screwed 4 mths ago
        But its just too bad for us because we cant deduct the 40% average loss we suffered on our 401k's.
    • Leo  •  4 mths ago
      This is a missed opportunity for Mitt (and the other Republican candidates) to explain why they think it is a good idea to tax income from investments a lot lower than income from labor. It would really help if voters understand this issue. There are actually good arguments to support this, but with none of the candidates explaining it in simple terms, how are voters supposed to know? I would expect any Republican who wants to be President to have practiced this for the debates.

      The same is true for the bailouts of a companies like AIG. Again, there are good arguments supporting it, but we never hear them. I would expect any politician running for reelection to be able to explan that.
      • Scott 4 mths ago
        Of course you realize that there are good arguments against it, too.
    • poyman  •  Killeen, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      What's embarrasing is the fact that Yahoo gives this author ink...
    • Debbie  •  Everett, Washington  •  4 mths ago
      John, because income is income and should be taxed as such ! Not a special rate for Corporate Raiders and Hedge Fund Managers !
      • Oliver 4 mths ago
        Debbie--what should the tax rate be on investments made by YOUR elected officials on the basis of inside information?? Please go back to work so the economy will benefit. We need more tax revenue along with higher productivity from American businesses. Don't drag your business down by being on the internet all day worry about Romney. See the light. There are big problems facing this country and it starts with the people in office who aren't doing their job of representing YOU. Vote them out.
    • Arthur  •  Mt Hamilton, California  •  4 mths ago
      Whether a Democrat or Republican, there is no excuse for a multi-millionaire to pay 15% in taxes. The money that they save does not create new jobs. It just creates a situation where their kids and their kids' kids never have to work a day in their lives. End these ridiculous loopholes.
    • cocheta  •  4 mths ago
      The American people are notoriously undereducated when it comes to matters of finance and taxation. There have been countless articles for years about how unequal the treatment for different kinds of income has become thanks to special breaks and laws passed by Congress. Maybe this will wake up the vast majority and make them realize that the tax code is so warped that we have to do something about it soon.

      They could also keep in mind a common proposal of the Republican candidates....that all capital gains should be untaxed. That means that the hedge fund managers, corporate CEOs and others of their ilk who get the majority of their income from sources classed as dividends and capital gains will pay even less in taxes and the average person will pay more.

      The US separated from England because people were tired of being ruled by a wealthy upper class that ignored their needs in favor of profitability for themselves. The French in similar circumstances managed to kill off a large portion of their oblivious upper class, though I cannot say that the fanatics that replaced them did any better. If we cannot learn from history, there is a great likelihood that similar events will take place again.
    • Scott  •  4 mths ago
      Doesn't seem fair that I work & pay considerably more than 15% tax on my income while he just makes profits from investments while doing no work & pays just 15%. I guess that is because it ISN"T fair.
    • Barbara  •  Omaha, Nebraska  •  4 mths ago
      Romney should be embarrassed and just proving the left right!
    • MatthewS  •  4 mths ago
      You cannot much blame rich people for taking advantage of tax loopholes. (Well, I suppose you could REALLY moralize and say they don't have to take loopholes that are unjust, but practically that isn't likely.)

      What I do blame Romney and others for is not taking advantage, but fighting to keep those loopholes and to make even bigger ones so they pay even less taxes. Romney pays about 15%, but he thinks he should pay about 0%. I blame him for that.

      Take the 15% tax rate while you can, but when the other people wake up and say, "Hey, I work for my money and I pay 25%! That isn't fair!", don't argue that it is just that you pay a lower percentage, and don't say that what you pay is unfair.
    • Debbie  •  Everett, Washington  •  4 mths ago
      They call them Corporate Raiders and Vulture Capitalists, they destroy companies, that is who Romney really is, a destroyer, not an employer !
    • JP  •  4 mths ago
      Hey New Braunfels, Texas... guess what? It matters or he wouldn't be trying to hide it. Further and even more troubling is that he considers $362,000 "Not very much." Really? I'm sure he will bring spending under control with an attitude like that, eh? Wake up dammit!
    • BryanT  •  4 mths ago
      He's not a tax evader, but he is an advocate of a system where the wealthy pay a smaller percentage of their income to support things like the military than do much poorer people.
    • Debbie  •  Everett, Washington  •  4 mths ago
      Romney got $$$ by taking it out of other companies, who earned it ! Leaving them wounded or closed. Putting people out of work, or lowering their wages ! And for this raiding he made $$$$$ and only pays 15% taxes !
    • Anonymous  •  4 mths ago
      So the man has good tax attorney's to prepare his taxes....what is the problem? I think people are too fixated on his income and on his religion. Better we look at the candidates abilities to run the country and to fix the economy and get us rolling again.
    • Philip  •  San Jose, California  •  4 mths ago
      Just release the tax records for twelve years like your honorable father and take it like a man.
    • h2o4ever  •  4 mths ago
      I don't really care about Romney's money, but I don't think it entitles him to buy the election either.

      If we recall, our last President was born with a silver spoon, graduated from college with an MBA, governed a state, ran several companies, and ran the economy right into the ground on his way out of office.

      So I'm not sure why we are clamoring to put a businessman cut from the same cloth back into the White House.
    • New Hampshire Voter  •  4 mths ago
      Did he admit he has millions in off shore bank accounts yet?
    • Mingo  •  4 mths ago
      Welfare in this county is now acceptable for the wealthy, as always, but not so for those who really need it. They're called all sorts of dirty names..............