Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Most of the unemployed no longer receive benefits

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The jobs crisis has left so many people out of work for so long that most of America's unemployed are no longer receiving unemployment benefits.

    Early last year, 75 percent were receiving checks. The figure is now 48 percent — a shift that points to a growing crisis of long-term unemployment. Nearly one-third of America's 14 million unemployed have had no job for a year or more.

    Congress is expected to decide by year's end whether to continue providing emergency unemployment benefits for up to 99 weeks in the hardest-hit states. If the emergency benefits expire, the proportion of the unemployed receiving aid would fall further.

    The ranks of the poor would also rise. The Census Bureau says unemployment benefits kept 3.2 million people from slipping into poverty last year. It defines poverty as annual income below $22,314 for a family of four.

    Yet for a growing share of the unemployed, a vote in Congress to extend the benefits to 99 weeks is irrelevant. They've had no job for more than 99 weeks. They're no longer eligible for benefits.

    Their options include food stamps or other social programs. Nearly 46 million people received food stamps in August, a record total. That figure could grow as more people lose unemployment benefits.

    So could the government's disability rolls. Applications for the disability insurance program have jumped about 50 percent since 2007.

    "There's going to be increased hardship," said Wayne Vroman, an economist at the Urban Institute.

    The number of unemployed has been roughly stable this year. Yet the number receiving benefits has plunged 30 percent.

    Government unemployment benefits weren't designed to sustain people for long stretches without work. They usually don't have to. In the recoveries from the previous three recessions, the longest average duration of unemployment was 21 weeks, in July 1983.

    By contrast, in the wake of the Great Recession, the figure reached 41 weeks in September. That's the longest on records dating to 1948. The figure is now 39 weeks.

    "It was a good safety net for a shorter recession," said Carl Van Horn, an economist at Rutgers University. It assumes "the economy will experience short interruptions and then go back to normal."

    Weekly unemployment checks average about $300 nationwide. If the extended benefits aren't renewed, growth could slow by up to a half-percentage point next year, economists say.

    The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that each $1 spent on unemployment benefits generates up to $1.90 in economic growth. The CBO has found that the program is the most effective government policy for increasing growth among 11 options it's analyzed.

    Jon Polis lives in East Greenwich, R.I., one of the 20 states where 99 weeks of benefits are available. He used them all up after losing his job as a warehouse worker in 2008. His benefits paid for groceries, car maintenance and health insurance.

    Now, Polis, 55, receives disability insurance payments, food stamps and lives in government-subsidized housing. He's been unable to find work because employers in his field want computer skills he doesn't have.

    "Employers are crying that they can't find qualified help," he said. But the ones he interviewed with "weren't willing to train anybody."

    From late 2007, when the recession began, to early 2010, the number of people receiving unemployment benefits rose more than four-fold, to 11.5 million.

    But the economy has remained so weak that an analysis of long-term unemployment data suggests that about 2 million people have used up 99 weeks of checks and still can't find work.

    Contributing to the smaller share of the unemployed who are receiving benefits: Some of them are college graduates or others seeking jobs for the first time. They aren't eligible. Only those who have lost a job through no fault of their own qualify.

    The proportion of the unemployed receiving benefits usually falls below 50 percent during an economic recovery. Many have either quit jobs or are new to the job market and don't qualify.

    Today, the proportion is falling for a very different reason: Jobs remain scarce. So more of the unemployed are exhausting their benefits.

    Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke has noted that the long-term unemployed increasingly find it hard to find work as their skills and professional networks erode. In a speech last month, Bernanke called long-term unemployment a "national crisis" that should be a top priority for Congress.

    Lawmakers will have to decide whether to continue the extended benefits by the end of this year. If the program ends, nearly 2.2 million people will be cut off by February.

    Congress has extended the program nine times. But it might balk at the $45 billion cost. It will be the first time the Republican-led House will vote on the issue.

     
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 mths ago
      Not to mention the fact that MOST of the ones who are employeed and lost GOOD jobs are now working in low wage / part time #$%$ jobs with no future.. The story is MUCH broader than unemployment...The story is THIS NATION IS IN A HELL OF A MESS!
    • A Yahoo! User  •  3 mths ago
      So without unemployment insurance these people are no longer counted as unemployed ? Our real unemployment is at or near 18 %
    • Ray  •  Las Vegas, United States  •  3 mths ago
      Finally the truth. How long did it take to notice. Most of those are no longer even counted. And everyone celebrated the unemployment rate going down by .1% just yesterday. They said 80,000 jobs created, what they did not say is how many dropped off the count list by loosing benefits.

      Now, Unemployment can not last forever, I was thankful for it while it lasted, but the inference that the economy is getting better is wrong (unless you refer to the uber rich who can buy at lower cost).

      Do you really think the solution is cutting their taxes? Do you really think they will just hire some people with all that extra money? Wealthy people are smart, they know you need people to purchase their products and services, and they know that is not a reality right now...
    • DUSTY  •  3 mths ago
      If we americans are to change anything,we must remove the
      the liars thugs and theives from politic's let them look for jobs.
    • trixtah  •  Fresno, United States  •  3 mths ago
      Last month I was fired from a job I had for almost ten years, I am willing to work I Want to work, but being a disabled vet and 54 years old, my chances are very slim about changing careers, I want a JOB not unemployment!
    • Marty  •  3 mths ago
      The company I worked for took millions in stimulus money and then promptly fired all their older, higher paid employees.
    • RockerBoomer  •  3 mths ago
      Unemployment and underemployment is a national crisis. There are far too many people who need jobs than there are jobs available, even at full capacity. The primary reason? Manufacturing in the United States has been moved offshore to reduce labor costs and boost profits. This results in less jobs for Americans (more unemployment) and less revenue streams for local & federal taxes (budget deficits). The US companies that employ foreign workers over americans are DESTROYING the quality of life in America while their CEO's and Executives get huge bonuses. One way to help is "voting" with your wallet: IF THEY WANT TO SELL IT IN AMERICA, THEN THEY NEED TO MAKE IT IN AMERICA.
    • Rick  •  3 mths ago
      9% is a friggin joke............
    • AK  •  3 mths ago
      My unemployment benefits ran out like a year ago. Haven't been able to find work since I left the military in Early 2009. I'd be homeless if it weren't for the Post 9/11 GI Bill. Hopefully I'll be able to get a decent job when I graduate but I'm not too optimistic in this economy.
    • Politically Correctional  •  3 mths ago
      Why does media call it the Great Recession when it's really a Depression. A Quiet Depression.
    • David  •  3 mths ago
      Time for the government to change the rules that made it profitable to move jobs overseas. Let government aid and tax breaks go to companies making and keeping jobs incountry.
    • Eric  •  3 mths ago
      And this is the reason the real unemployment numbers are not known. People drink the Kool Aid when these reports come out. Start counting soldiers that will not have jobs, or the ones that have exceeded 2 years unemployment that are not counted, or the millions of college graduates with no jobs that are not counted at all
    • bleacher seat  •  Warren, United States  •  3 mths ago
      Count me in as one of the uncounted. Try getting a decent job if you are over 50.
    • star_spangled_socialist  •  3 mths ago
      This is the reason unemployment is going down so fast, no one has any left!
    • Mark  •  3 mths ago
      What this country needs are more unemployed politicians.
      -- Edward Langley, Artist (1928-1995)
    • maryjanesuncle  •  Springfield, United States  •  3 mths ago
      So what is the real percentage of unemployment...much higher than 9%..no wonder 15% of Americans are on food stamps.
    • SamSquatch  •  Reno, United States  •  3 mths ago
      Don't these people drop off the unemployment figure when they stop getting (or putting in claims for) unemployment? This is even worse than we can imagine........
    • jimmy  •  3 mths ago
      i don't want to go on welfare i have worked my whole life and i like to work it makes me feel good but i just can't find a job that pays a living wage i work part time right now at a restaurant making minimum wage $7.25 only get 15 hours a week i used to work full time in a warehouse making $15 an hour, now i'm just plain broke can barely afford to keep gas in my van let alone make my insurance payments then there's rent,gas and electric oh yes food my girlfriend and myself eat 1 meal a day she wants to apply for food stamps which means i will too. i have never been on welfare and i don't want to be. but it's either welfare or starve and become homeless
    • dean h  •  Elmhurst, United States  •  3 mths ago
      Of course they dont! We're too busy sending benefits to other countries
    • Mark  •  3 mths ago
      I cannot believe this. An actual honest article from the AP. All this smoke and mirrors about the unemployment and long term dropping is simply people running out of benefits. When you can no longer collect, you are not counted. It doesn't mean you are working, it means you are worse off then previously.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...
    • HP logo is seen outside Hewlett-Packard Belgian headquarters in Diegem
      HP shares fall on sharp profit decline

      (Reuters) - Shares of Hewlett-Packard Co were down 2 percent in premarket trading on Thursday after the world's No. 1 computer maker posted a sharp decline in quarterly earnings and warned it would take … More »HP shares fall on sharp profit decline

      HP logo is seen outside Hewlett-Packard Belgian headquarters in Diegem

      (Reuters) - Shares of Hewlett-Packard Co were down 2 percent in premarket trading on Thursday after the world's No. 1 computer maker posted a sharp decline in quarterly earnings and warned it would take several years to turn around its sprawling businesses. The storied Silicon Valley company, which has been trying to move …

     
    Brought to you byYahoo! Finance
    Loading...