Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    NASA Launches Space Shuttle on Historic Final Mission

    This story was updated at 2 p.m. EDT.

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. — The space shuttle Atlantis soared into the heavens and the history books Friday (July 8), kicking off the last-ever mission of NASA's storied shuttle program.

    Despite a bleak forecast of thunderstorms and clouds, the shuttle beat the weather in a stunning midday launch, sailing into the sky on one final voyage. The coutndown toward liftoff took a dramatic pause at T minus 31 seconds while ground crews verified that a vent arm at the top of the shuttle was fully retracted. NASA was quickly able to push on toward liftoff.

    Atlantis blasted off at 11:29 a.m. EDT (1529 GMT) from Launch Pad 39A here at NASA's Kennedy Space Center, thrilling huge throngs of spectators who had descended on Florida's Space Coast to see the swan song of an American icon. NASA estimated that between 750,000 and 1 million people turned out to watch history unfold before their eyes.

    Related: Eyewitness to shuttle history

    "On behalf of the greatest team in the world, good luck to you and your crew on the final flight of this true American icon," shuttle launch director Mike Leinbach told the astronauts just before launch. "And so for the final time, Fergie, Doug, Sandy and Rex, good luck, Godspeed and have a little fun up there."

    "Thanks to you and your team, Mike. We're not ending the journey today, we're completing a chapter of a journey that will never end," Atlantis' commander Chris Ferguson replied. "Let's light this shuttle one more time Mike and witness this nation at its best. The crew of Atlantis is ready to launch."

    After 135 launches over 30 years, the space shuttle will never streak into the sky again. [Video: Last Launch Of Shuttle Atlantis]  

    Atlantis and its four-astronaut crew are headed for a rendezvous with the International Space Station. The main goal of the shuttle's 12-day flight — Atlantis' 33rd mission after nearly 26 years of flying — is to deliver a year's worth of supplies and spare parts to the orbiting lab.

    Related: Shuttle astronauts - where are they now

    But the world's attention is fixed more on what Atlantis' last mission means than on what it will accomplish in orbit.

    "For an entire generation who grew up with the space shuttle, this is a moment that won't be appreciated for some time to come," said space history expert Robert Pearlman, editor of collectSPACE.com and a SPACE.com contributor. "People have taken it for granted; I don't think its absence is going to be immediately felt."

    A skeleton crew

    Commander Chris Ferguson is leading a skeleton crew  of four on Atlantis' STS-135 flight. He's joined by pilot Doug Hurley and mission specialists Rex Walheim and Sandy Magnus. Other shuttle missions over the years have typically carried six or seven spaceflyers, but NASA wanted to use every bit of available space to pack extra cargo on this last drop-off mission to the station.

    The astronauts will deliver about 9,500 pounds (4,318 kilograms) of cargo to the station. Atlantis is also delivering several different science experiments, one of which — the Robotic Refueling Mission — is an attempt to demonstrate a way to refuel satellites robotically on orbit.

    In addition, Atlantis is also carrying two iPhone 4 smartphones loaded with apps to help astronauts perform experiments in space. This represents the first time iPhones have ever gone to space.

     Atlantis will chase the station down for a while, finally docking with the $100 billion orbiting lab on Sunday (July 10). The shuttle is scheduled to return to Earth for the final time on July 20.

    Until Atlantis rolls to a stop on the runway, the astronauts plan to focus on the tasks they have to perform over the next 12 days, putting off meditations on their mission's historic significance as much as possible.

    Related: How NASA can inspire America again

    "We're not going to dwell on it too much until after landing," Ferguson said before launch in a recent NASA video. "Then we'll get a chance — hopefully following a great, successful mission — to kind of bask in the achievements of the program overall, and really reflect." [NASA's Space Shuttle Program In Pictures: A Tribute]

    The end of an era

    NASA's space shuttle program was born in January 1972, when President Richard Nixon announced its existence to the nation. Back in those days, the shuttle was billed as a breakthrough vehicle that could enable safe, frequent and relatively cheap access to space.

    "The shuttle era really was an effort to do a whole new kind of spaceflight," Valerie Neal, curator of human spaceflight at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C., told SPACE.com. The shuttle program, she added, "held with it the promise of making space just a normal part of human endeavor."

    The first flight took place on April 12, 1981. Since then, the shuttle — the world's first and only reusable spacecraft — has become NASA's workhorse vehicle, with the five-shuttle fleet making 135 flights over three decades.

    Related:  A look back at the first space mission

    Some of these flights have deployed or repaired important pieces of scientific hardware, such as the Hubble Space Telescope. And many missions since 1998 have helped build the International Space Station, which is now nearly complete.

    In addition to these hardware accomplishments, shuttle missions have carried 355 different individuals from 16 different countries into low-Earth orbit, according to NASA officials. So the shuttle delivered on part of its promise, experts say, opening space up to many more people than had been possible previously and helping humanity develop its nascent capabilities in low-Earth orbit.

    But the space shuttle didn't turn out to be cheap or completely safe. NASA once estimated launches could cost as little as $20 million; they've turned out to run nearly $1.6 billion each. And two shuttle missions — Challenger's STS-51L flight in 1986 and Columbia's STS-107 mission in 2003 — ended in tragedy, killing a total of 14 astronauts.

    Ultimately, historians will likely debate the shuttle program's legacy for years to come.

    Retirement awaits

    When Atlantis touches down later this month, its flying days will be over. But the orbiter will still have to be prepped for one final mission: educating the public about spaceflight, and perhaps inspiring youngsters to become astronauts themselves someday.

    Like the two other remaining shuttles — Endeavour and Discovery — Atlantis will become a museum showpiece. Atlantis won't have to go far; it will assume a place of pride in the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex here.

    Discovery is headed for the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum, while Endeavour will make the trip west to the California Science Center in Los Angeles.

    Without the space shuttles, NASA will rely on Russian Soyuz vehicles to ferry astronauts to and from the space station, which is slated to operate until at least 2020. The agency wants private American craft to take over this taxi service eventually, but that probably won't happen for at least four or five years.

    For its part, NASA has begun shifting its focus beyond low-Earth orbit. Last year, President Barack Obama charged the space agency with sending astronauts to an asteroid by 2025, and then on to Mars by the mid-2030s.

    As exciting as both of these exploration prospects are, they remain far off, both in space and time. Right now, most thoughts are with Atlantis as it streaks toward the space station, its final mission closing out the life of a spacecraft that came to represent a nation in many ways.

    Over the years, the space shuttle became a symbol of America, its ambitious goals and its technological know-how, experts say.

    "The shuttle became a very powerful icon," Roger Launius, space history curator at the National Air and Space Museum, told SPACE.com, "just as serviceable an icon as the astronauts landing on the moon, in terms of national prestige abroad and pride at home."

    You can follow SPACE.com senior writer Mike Wall on Twitter: @michaeldwall. Visit SPACE.com for complete coverage of Atlantis' final mission STS-135 or follow us @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

     

    1,816 comments

    • axeofgod  •  7 mths ago
      NASA... Need Another Seven Astronauts.
    • ital_baby_girl  •  7 mths ago
      damn ignorant and of course forgetful americans. how quickly you take all the praise and flory for nasa and its history of space exploration. Last time I checked it was called the North American Space Agency not the United States Space Agency. Up until the collapse of the Avril Arrow super sonic fihter jet project was cancelled in Canada you had nothing to build NASA on. Engineers from our program gave you the technology to design and build not only the space shuttle but also the space station by using the CANADArm. now you have a canadian made robot about ot test satellite repair. you americans could not done this 30 years of missions without our help and also that of the russiians. how dare you be so ignorant in taking all the credit. then again tha is so typical of americans. way to go canada. be prouf of OUR space accomplishments too!!!
    • Kim Deveau  •  7 mths ago
      This is the end of an era of the Space Shuttle . Not the entire space program . If I recall correctly NASA has plans for a manned outpost on the moon . (Call it a warm up session before going to Mars. Unless that has been scrubbed ? )
      I do know that they are or at least were working on a new space vehicle similar only larger to the Apollo rockets . Time and money will tell for sure .
      There is no need to be in a rush . Haste in that business equals a much larger probability for disaster. Space will be around longer than the planet . And the missions that will finally ensue ,will be beyond anything that the space shuttle can do .
      I will miss the Shuttle . It is definitely the coolest looking . But the space shuttle can't even get us to the moon . Let alone to an asteroid .So in a sense The shuttle was sort of a step backward in that regard.
      People worried about the pittance of money that NASA spends are imbeciles . They have NO clue as to the miracles our space program has achieved and for much less money than many Companies would even believe possible . Sort of like making Bugatti Veryons for a few hundred dollars AND turning a profit and getting 60 miles to the gallon instead of the other way around.
      Too bad that our armed forces can't seem to do the same . I see no miracles for tiny amounts of cash coming from that quarter.
      Why is that ? My guess is the incredible lack of self control by major greedy weapons manufacturers , for the most part.
      And then the greedy SOB's That seem to think that oil is everything .So we go and protect THEIR INTERESTS with solders lives and OUR MONEY ! WTF will they do when it runs out ?
      It sure would be interesting if WE THE PEOPLE got to vote on EXACTLY HOW AND WHERE our tax dollars are spent .
      Those same people probably have no concept of humanities NEED to explore . It is built in our genes . It is as much a part of us as our skin.
      Eventually we will get there. Especially If they manage to land on a solid Nickel Iron asteroid . Some greedy Tycoon will put up the funds to figure out how to mine the thing and make trillions.
    • The Anti-Rex  •  7 mths ago
      To think of what could have been accomplished if it hadn't been for the so-called "Cold War". Humans! Pathetic species!!
    • ME  •  7 mths ago
      It is harder to track distribution of funds outside the U.S. Why els do you think there is so much outsourcing going on. Just think of the billions that can be pocketed once we pay another country to transport us and our goods around.
    • Bear Heart  •  7 mths ago
      I'm angry that we can keep B-52 flying for 60 years, but not the space shuttles. Thanks for GW Bush for killing the program. It's too dangerous!!! like war is safe?
    • trollmaster  •  7 mths ago
      as the one astronauts says to the other astronauts after grabbing a floating babe ruth with a smile this is pretty good the other astronauts says gee I thought that flush down the toilet
    • Harold  •  7 mths ago
      Bush and the GOP's trickle down economics have failed. The Bush Wars and Bush tax cuts have destroyed our economy. The idiot Bush felt his wars were more important than the shuttle program so he shut it down since we could'nt afford both. Lets get rid of these Rupubs who pander to the rich so we can get our economy back on track so we can again support NASA!!!
    • Honk City  •  7 mths ago
      Too bad they didn't take Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld up there and put them into orbit.
    • Jay  •  7 mths ago
      It is sickening that people are using the Space Shuttle cancellation as a platform to promote Bush hatred. While it is true that GW signed the order to end the Shuttle, it was not without a replacement. The Constellation Project (CxP) would be the replacement for the shuttle. GW did not want the US to be without a platform for manned spaceflight. Obama cancelled the Constellation Project and with it cancelled our ability to send a man into space.
    • Paid Poster  •  7 mths ago
      If Sarah Palin were president she would have us drilling on the moon for oil!
    • Harold  •  7 mths ago
      Bush and the GOP's trickle down economics have failed. The Bush Wars and Bush tax cuts have destroyed our economy. The idiot Bush felt his wars were more important than the shuttle program so he shut it down since we could'nt afford both. Lets get rid of these Rupubs who pander to the rich so we can get our economy back on track so we can again support NASA!!!
    • russell  •  7 mths ago
      Hey kids,
      We have no one to blame really for the end of manned space flight other than ourselves. In modern American culture, the space program and everything it represented(Innovation, progress, imagination and exploration) were ridiculed and ignored(Look at how we idolize sports figures
      and celebrity over true heroism and academic achievement). We were too concerned with lining
      our own pockets with profit rather than the future of our children, country or planet. It didn't start with Obama, Bush or any president or political party. This came about years ago because we ridiculed those who dreamed and gave creedence to those who scoffed.
      I guess it'll be China or India who will lead the way because Americans have lost theirs.
    • John  •  7 mths ago
      money better spent on space than on wars!!!!
    • Roberto  •  7 mths ago
      Ultimately, the losses and gains from space exploration are our own. Billions have been spent in space, sure, but look at what it has accomplished - satellite communications, new materials, electronic microcircuits, etc. As for those who blast manned exploration of space, remember that a robot can only go as far as its design and programming allows it to go. A human being can adapt and fix problems, a robot cannot.
    • swt  •  7 mths ago
      Great day for the Shuttle and America....sad day for the Shuttle and America..guess we'll have to rely on Russian maybe China..what's happened to the USA?
    • Cai  •  7 mths ago
      Thank you NASA for giving us the technology for personal computers and cell phones. Thank you for giving us satellite images of our world, improved medicines and medical treatments, nanotechnology, and for scientific diplomacy that crossed every political barrier. Thank you.
    • Owen K  •  7 mths ago
      Think of the thousands of highly trained technicians that will now be without jobs. The end of the program signals the end of many careers.
    • Doug  •  7 mths ago
      Hmmm ... 135 launches at $1.6 billion each comes out to $216 billion. A drop in the bucket compared to our national debt. Well worth every penny, if you ask me.
    • Lee143  •  7 mths ago
      If you would all consider that NASA is funded with only a fraction of 1% of the federal budget, you would realize how silly it is to claim that it is "wasting" tax payer money. Spending a fraction of 1 percent of the federal budget has little to no implication on the economy (you are literally spending pennies a day individually to fund NASA), and considering that NASA generates much more economic prosperity through its innovations than is used to fund it, I'd say that it's a fraction of a percent well spent.
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...