Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Would Obama's corporate tax cut speed the recovery?

    The president wants to slash the tax rate on businesses — but raise corporate tax revenue by eliminating loopholes

    On Wednesday, President Obama proposed cutting the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 28 percent. But the administration insists that this wouldn't deplete federal coffers. Instead, the plan would actually generate more revenue for the federal government, because Obama wants to eliminate loopholes and subsidies that allow many corporations to pay a lot less than 35 percent, and in some cases, zero. Obama is also proposing a minimum tax on foreign earnings. Is this sensible, overdue reform, or a recovery-killing tax hike in disguise?

    The proposal would doom the recovery: "This is a terrible, terrible plan," says James Pethokoukis at The American. The stagnant economic recovery is already "arguably the worst in modern American history," and instead of giving corporate America a hand, Obama now wants to saddle companies with so-called reform that would "actually raise the tax burden on American business by $250 billion over a decade." That would make us less competitive than ever, and doom our chances of bouncing back anytime soon.
    "Why Obama's corporate tax plan is a total bust"

    It's a step in the right direction: Obama's proposal "is a helpful start to the much-needed discussion about how best to reform the corporate tax code," Maya MacGuineas, president of the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, tells Reuters. But if anything, it doesn't go far enough. What the U.S. really needs is comprehensive reform of the corporate and individual tax codes at the same time. "That would be a real boost to the economy."
    "Obama urges corporate tax cut, closing loopholes"

    Obama's plan won't affect the economy much either way: U.S. corporate profits have already "rebounded to their pre-recession heights," says Pat Garofolo at ThinkProgress. And despite all of the whining from the Right, the tax rate that U.S. companies actually pay is the second lowest in the world. That helps explain why our corporate tax haul is at a 40-year low. But because Obama's plan doesn't aim for a truly significant revenue increases, it won't make much difference at all.
    "5 key facts about the Obama administration's corporate tax overhaul"

    Face it — this proposal is all about the election: "There's little chance... that this tax reform proposal will make it through Congress," says Norah O'Donnell at CBS News, which means Obama's plan will have no impact whatsoever on the economy. But it will play a role in the presidential election. Leading GOP candidate Mitt Romney unveils his own economic plan this week, and Obama is itching to start an election-year debate in which he's the one who looks like a tax cutter and reformer.
    "White House wants election year fight over taxes"

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    72 comments

    • Robert  •  3 mths ago
      The problem with the loopholes is that they have often been narrowly targeted; some industries benefit while others don#$%$ an utterly haphazard, broken system that reeks of cronyism and good-old-boy networks. It needs to be fixed.
      • The Magician 3 mths ago
        Exactly. Thrown out and begun over....new tax code, tight, lean and mean.
    • Mary Farris  •  3 mths ago
      The only tax breaks that should be left in place are for companies that hire CITIZENS OR PERMANENT LEGAL RESIDENTS (no more importing workers to do jobs that those workers have been laid off from - and yes, an H1B is cheaper than a citizen/permanent legal resident) - and they only get the break after a job has been in place at least a year!
    • JEFF H  •  3 mths ago
      There is provision in it that would tax dividends at the regular rate too, and add a percentage for Obamacare. While this may not be horrible for the super rich, what about your Grandparents who get dividend checks from there investments? You know the ones they use to live on during retirement.
      • Hope 3 mths ago
        Obama is always picking the "winners and losers". I'm sure many are exempt and the devil is always in the details with these bills. Obamacare is a prime example.
      • The Magician 3 mths ago
        This so-called Obamacare, if one will remember, is almost eactly what was touted by republicans a couple short years ago. Somehow that gets lost.
      • tsukinofaerii 3 mths ago
        My heart bleeds for those poor millionaires who might have to shell out extra money for roads, schools and federal services. I weep, that they suffer the indignity of going from super rich to merely extremely so.

        If your grandparents are making enough in dividends to see a major tax increase, then they're unlikely to be hurt by it.
    • forestgump  •  3 mths ago
      if he would have done it when he was elected sure.......but obama has not been about creating, it has always been suppression.....now he finds himself in a little bind with gas prices......obama has set back and let iran create this mess......so taxpayers are the ones that get hurt.......entitlement people could care less.......that has been job one for obama....they vote...half the country don't pay taxes so he has 50 percent of the vote already.
      • The Magician 3 mths ago
        Anti-Obama people cannot on the one hand say it's all about suppression and on the other say he is all about big give-aways. "Obamacare" is it's current form is essentially a republican notion just a couple years ago.
    • howard  •  3 mths ago
      Why do we not demand a flat tax? its simple, no deductions , no returns,everyone pays and you could do it on a one page form
      • The Magician 3 mths ago
        Would you go so far as to legalize and tax what is the most lucrative crop in over 15 states?
      • tsukinofaerii 3 mths ago
        Because a flat tax 1) Decreases revenue, 2) increases taxes on the poor and 3) decreases taxes on the wealthy. Simple isn't always better.
      • howard 3 mths ago
        Tsusk, thanks for not starting ur comment with name calling thats a first for me. I must agree to disagree. One thing i did not add was it would have to be culminated with spending cuts. I have read studies on it and from what I have read it will work. Magician, I believe in states rights and think it should be a state issue However, Federal aid programs to treat those that get addicted should be non existent. Taxes are to high. Cuts must be made and everyone needs to pay something
        Thanks for the comments
    • lee  •  Milwaukee, Wisconsin  •  3 mths ago
      Would ALL the loopholes be closed ? The DEVILS in the DETAILS.
    • Melissa  •  3 mths ago
      I wonder if Obama really believes his own bull shirt? Or is he just mentally nuts?
      • Hope 3 mths ago
        He campaigned as a "moderate" and governed as a far left radical. He's saying what the people want to hear for election purposes only. TRUST IS GONE!
      • Concerned 3 mths ago
        He spent his whole life as a Con, ghetto blacks in chicago, and now us!! His life is not about doing anything, just spin!! it is always someone elses fault!!
      • Topkick 3 mths ago
        "mentally nuts?" Redundant, or is there another form of nuts?
    • KsDevil  •  Kansas City, Missouri  •  3 mths ago
      lower one side, raise another and see how it works out. Not exactly tax reform. Hardly worth getting upset about.
    • David  •  Irvine, California  •  3 mths ago
      The problem is that no matter how much Democrats get in taxes they spend more.... a lot more... I live in California and we had record tax revenues from 2000 to 2008 but the Democrats always outspent what was taken in. Four more years of Obama... means 5+ trillion more in debt...... don't burden you children with that.......
    • Alan  •  3 mths ago
      it sounds good for an election year but taxing all foreign revenue on these companies might make em pull out of the US & move corporate headquarters overseas instead of having them move back home. it's a global economy now thanks to their big free trade scam the politicians sold us on & they go where they can make the most money......the corporations. I dunno. the tax cut to 28% is a distraction for the big tax hike on the foreign profits. Obama needs money for his social agenda & he doesn't have it. if he has bernanke print any more money the dollar will become worthless & no one will lend us any more money. when you're borrowing 42 cents on every dollar & running a tillion dollar a yr deficit what happens when the loan tap is shut off? disaster......the government will not have the money to pay half of what they fund now & guess where they will get it from? us, plus cut medicare, social security, federal union pensions, food stamps, enemployment payments.......the whole works and raise taxes thru the roof. the politicians & the government will save themselves & throw us overboard. riot & protest like in Greece & they will impose martial law and throw the constitution in the trash can. why do you think Hillary is so anxious along with the other progressives & liberals to impose gun controls & take away the guns? they know this is a very distinct possibility if not a future certainty & they don't want us to have guns. with all our 16 trillion in debt which doesn't include what they owe social security & medicare, fannie mae & freddie mac nor the union pension obligations of federal workers the debt is way more than they admit to. the mainstream media lies to us & won't report the truth. the future does not look good to me. believe the fantasy they spin if you want, I'm trying to prepare for the worst & pray-hope it doesn't happen and that I am so very wrong. we have to quit spending money we don't have & stop borrowing it, and it is gonna to be hard & painful with a lot of sacrifices & the spend junkie addicted government & politicians we have need to go if they can't get their act togather & do what's right.
    • twigd2  •  3 mths ago
      How exactly does this qualify as a tax cut when it actually increases the amount of tax owed? Must be that new-fangled Obama math.
    • FredRick  •  3 mths ago
      Might want to think about your signature Obamacare if you are looking for cutting something that would stimulate the economy.
    • Gerald  •  Grand Rapids, Michigan  •  3 mths ago
      Just words just speeches,sounds good until the true facts come out, also heard he wants to tax companies that make profits overseas he will drive all companies out of america at this rate.
    • ReduceGOV  •  3 mths ago
      Obama's so-called tax cuts aren't really tax cuts. He confiscates from Peter to pay Paul. The proposed law is not universally applied as is most of his proposals. Only his favorites get the tax cuts, and they only apply to corporations. What about SME's who are primarily partnerships and sole proprietors who make in the $1 million range? They get soaked. That's Obama's plan - soak small business and favor his cronies. He is as deceitful as the day is long and cannot be trusted. That's the reason Republicans can't and won't work with him. Obama lies and moves his markers. He is the worst liar the presidency has ever seen.
    • Melissa  •  3 mths ago
      Kinda like Obama saying he would create or save 4 million jobs. Heads you lose, tails you lose. Brilliant plan, rotflmao!
    • marlboroman  •  3 mths ago
      that scrolling Bill Maher ad sux
    • Read All About It  •  Houston, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      Lower the price of gas odummy! That will put money in our pockets! Stop taking your expensive vacations on our dime you freeloader!
    • Joseph  •  Irvine, California  •  3 mths ago
      Man , he is dancing on the head of a pin now! His " transparancy " should be clear to all by now. The only excuse is glaucoma.
    • sinecureseeker  •  3 mths ago
      it might get him more campaign money, that's his top priority
    • Gabriel  •  3 mths ago
      would obo's exit from America speed the economy?