Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Occupy protesters sue over free speech, force

    Most major Occupy encampments have been dispersed, but they live on in a flurry of lawsuits in which protesters are asserting their constitutional rights to free speech and assembly and challenging authorities' mass arrests and use of force to break up tent cities.

    Lawyers representing protesters have filed lawsuits — or are planning them — in state and federal courts from coast to coast, challenging eviction orders and what they call heavy-handed police tactics and the banning of demonstrators from public properties.

    Some say the fundamental right of protest has been criminalized in places, with protesters facing arrest and charges while doing nothing more than exercising protected rights to demonstrate.

    "When I think about the tents as an expression of the First Amendment here, I compare it to Tahrir Square in Egypt," said Carol Sobel, co-chairwoman of the National Lawyers Guild's Mass Defense Committee.

    "Our government is outraged when military forces and those governments come down on the demonstrators. But they won't extend the same rights in this country," she said. "They praise that as a fight for democracy, the values we treasure. It comes here and these people are riffraff."

    A handful of protesters began camping out in September in a lower Manhattan plaza, demanding an end to corporate excess and income inequality, and were soon joined by scores of others who set up tents and remained around the clock. Similar camps sprang up in dozens of cities nationwide and around the world, but patience wore thin, and many camps — including the flagship at Zuccotti Park and in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Denver, Los Angeles, Oakland, Philadelphia and Portland, Ore. — were forcibly cleared.

    Public officials and police unions have generally defended moves to break up the camps, citing health and safety concerns. They also said that responding to problems at Occupy encampments was draining crime-fighting resources.

    Protester lawsuits are now beginning to wend their way through the legal system, and attorneys say more are likely on the way.

    The National Lawyers Guild and the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California sued the Oakland Police Department in federal court in November, saying police and other agencies violated demonstrators' Fourth Amendment rights by using excessive force — including "flash-bang" grenades — against demonstrators who posed no safety threat. The suit says officials also violated their First Amendment rights to assemble and demonstrate.

    Oakland Mayor Jean Quan on Wednesday announced an independent investigation into the police response.

    In Austin, Texas, this week, a federal judge has been hearing the case of two Occupy protesters who were arrested and later barred from City Hall under a policy their attorneys call overly broad and say amounts to a ban on speech. The Texas Civil Rights Project says around 106 people have been banned since the protests began, in some cases for up to a year. The policy says a criminal trespass notice may be issued for "unreasonably disruptive" conduct.

    Yvette Felarca is among those suing campus police and administration officials at the University of California, Berkeley, after officers forcefully dispersed a group of Occupy protesters and others rallying for public education last month.

    Felarca, a middle school teacher and organizer with the civil rights organization By Any Means Necessary, which filed the suit, says she was standing, arms linked with other demonstrators', before a line of police officers who moved in after some tents were set up on a lawn. She said she was chanting and yelling when a police officer hit her in the throat with his baton. She said she was also hit in her ribs, abdomen and back and watched others bear repeated blows.

    "The brutality was absolutely designed to chill the speech of students in the movement and literally try to beat and terrorize our right to criticize, to think critically and to act on that criticism," Felarca said.

    The university has called it "disconcerting" that the suit contains "so many inaccuracies."

    Sobel, of the National Lawyers Guild, said a lawsuit is also planned in the case of the pepper-spraying by campus police of peaceful protesters at the University of California, Davis, video footage of which went viral.

    Donna Lieberman, executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, called the lawsuits an important check on police power. She noted that authorities haven't been uniformly excessive around the country, but pointed in New York City to mass arrests on the Brooklyn Bridge — which are under litigation — as well as the pepper-spraying of several women and the dark-of-night breakup of Zuccotti Park.

    She said that her group has been concerned for years about police tactics, but that the response to the Occupy movement shines a light on them in a way that "engages and offends a new sector of the public."

    She predicted there will be other lawsuits about excessive force, civil rights violations and mostly likely people's rights to get back into Zuccotti, which she said police have blocked from public usage with their pens.

    "I think what's been happening with Occupy is so reminiscent of what happened during the Republican National Convention" in 2008, she said. "When people get together to engage in that most American of pastimes — protest — it almost always generates a defensive and repressive response from law enforcement. Occupy is no exception."

    Gene Policinski, executive director of the First Amendment Center in Nashville, Tenn., said police overreacted to the Occupy movement in some cities, which probably earned protesters some new support. Still, he noted, protesters' First Amendment rights are not without limitation.

    "We've always had to balance our rights," he said. "No one can really claim you have an unfettered unlimited First Amendment rights. The courts are there to say, wait a minute, that goes too far, or that's OK. It is part of that give and take. Of course we all wish our rights were never intruded upon."

    ___

    Niedowski reported from Providence, R.I. Associated Press writer Deepti Hajela in New York contributed.

     
    • Fair and Balanced  •  5 mths ago
      OWS chant:
      What do we want? Vague generalities!
      Who do we want it from? Somebody else!
      When do we want it? Now!
      • The Ascii-ist 5 mths ago
        ─╔═══════════════════════════════╗
        ─║─╔═════╗─╔═╗──╔═╗──╔═╗─╔═════╗─║
        ─║─║▓▓▓▓▓║─║▓║──║▓║──║▓║─║▓▓▓▓▓║─║
        ─║─║▓╔═╗▓║─║▓║─╔╝▓╚╗─║▓║─║▓╔═══╝─║
        ─║─║▓║─║▓║─║▓╚╗║▓▓▓║╔╝▓║─║▓╚═══╗─║
        ─║─║▓║─║▓║─╚╗▓╠╝▓▓▓╚╣▓╔╝─║▓▓▓▓▓║─║
        ─║─║▓║─║▓║──║▓▓▓╔╩╗▓▓▓║──╚═══╗▓║─║
        ─║─║▓╚═╝▓║──╚╗▓╔╝─╚╗▓╔╝──╔═══╝▓║─║
        ─║─║▓▓▓▓▓║───║▓║───║▓║───║▓▓▓▓▓║─║
        ╔╝─╚═════╝───╚═╝───╚═╝───╚═════╝─╚═╗
        ║╔═╗╔═╗╔╗─╔╔══╗╔══╗╔╗╔╗╔══╗╔══╗──╔╗║
        ║║╬║║╬║╚╝╔╝╠══╝╚╗╔╝║║║║║╬╬║╚╗╔╝──║║║
        ║╚╗║╚╗║─╔╝─╚══╗─║║─║║║║║╔═╝─║║─╔═╝║║
        ║─║║─║║╔╝╔╗╔══╣─║║─║╚╝║║║──╔╝╚╗║╬╬║║
        ║─╚╝─╚╝╝─╚╝╚══╝─╚╝─╚══╝╚╝──╚══╝╚══╝║
        ╚══════════════════════════════════╝
      • True Dave 5 mths ago
        You know exactlly what they want but cant believe to them Socializim is NOT a dirty word.
    • kay  •  5 mths ago
      every women who was raped at one of these camps needs to sue every group that suports these people! shame on them for allowing women to be treated like that!!
    • Greg  •  5 mths ago
      Although I have no problems with the exercise of free speech, but don't you need permits? Shouldn't they be responsible for costs of clean up after themselves? Shouldn't they act responsible enough to not bring criminals to their protests? Shouldn't they be responsible for all the vandalism?
      I've been following the OWS movement and all I see and get out of it is mostly a bunch of young adults that want anarchy and handouts. Just last week, an OWS group were trespassing in a church's vacant lot after being told no and that it was private property. One protester said it's all about finding a place of their own to organize and plan. I can only imagine to organize and plan more crimes. They were ready to take and occupy private property as their own regardless of the law, permission or not.
      And an organization being affiliated with OWS being called By Any Means Necessary says it all.
      • VillageIdiot 5 mths ago
        I appreciate a few of your points, however if people are required to pay for permits and cleanup in order to demonstrate, then you have created a situation where persons without sufficient money are unable to exercise their right to free speech, thereby defeating the entire purpose of having it as a right. Because what good are your rights if you need wealth to be allowed to make use of them?
      • fugitive 5 mths ago
        Greg all you are seeing is what some of the OWS did wrong. Look at the bigger picture as to the inequality and the exploitation perpetrated by CEO’s Banks, and Wall Street against the majority of American’s. If you look at what crimes they committed because of politicians allowing them to take our homes, charge us outrageous interest rates on credit cards, and over inflate costs of living, OWS are guilty of lesser of two evils. The young people who are members of OWS are educated about the profound injustices committed in this country like I was through college education. I was aware of this impending social problem through studies in contemporary social problems in college in 2001. You would not read about it in the news because of the political propaganda. Do not be so short sighted and question that they needed permits to exercise their freedom of speech. Do the CEO's and Wall St. and banks have permits to commit injustices against us? No!
      • Greg 5 mths ago
        The points you make, Fugitive, SOUND good, but the reality of it is, like you stated, "if you look at what crimes they committed because of politicians".... Notice the last word. THAT is who commit these "crimes" by giving "Permi"ssion to CEO's and Wall St. Laws are in place for reason. Without them, you have anarchy. Short-sightedness has never been a weakness of mine. The big picture is how I have always looked at things with a lot of common-sense that college can't teach, but rather a lot of liberal left-wing propaganda. What's a better way to control than by teaching people whaty you want them to know. Misinformation sounds like your greatest weakness.
        Oh, and it looks like some village lost it's idiot.
    • krista  •  Pooler, Georgia  •  5 mths ago
      If they want the constitution upheld then they had also better be willing to stand for us that want the freedom OF religion and not grip whenever we want a MERRY CHRISTMAS, in GOD we trust, a manger scene, or the freedom to own a gun and protect ourselves, etc. Can't pick and choose what freedom you want but impede others from their freedoms in the next breath. Or how about the freedom to make your own money and not be force to give it to someone who doesn't work for theirs but screams "ITS NOT FAIR"
      • J S 5 mths ago
        Considering that God is really a personfication of the Sun, your argument has no merit.
      • Thomas 5 mths ago
        Krista freedom of religion works two ways.non believers are entitled to have freedom from well meaning people trying to convert them and pushing what they believe to be a fairy tale in their faces. A good job turning the other cheek with that.gun in your hand/As far as the money they are fighting for your right to keep your own money as a wage earner,They are asking for jobs,education,medical care all those things a good christian should be willing to give,freely and openly.You know Jesus was a socialist? look it up ,he healed the sick ,gave to the poor,gave to ceaser what was ceasers.drove the money lenders out of the temple. He was non violent ,what do you think he would say about guns.
      • B 5 mths ago
        Freedom OF Religion = Freedom FROM Religion.
        Freedom FROM Religion = Freedom OF Religion.
    • Restore The Sanity  •  5 mths ago
      So what were they protesting again, was it greed?
      • Greg 5 mths ago
        They are protesting for anarchy and handouts, I think. I'm still not sure with all the mixed messages they send.
      • republicandrinkingtea 5 mths ago
        Yes. Their greed. They want more freebies and handouts. Typical Democraps.
      • True Dave 5 mths ago
        Whats with this "They" stuff?
    • K  •  Corona, California  •  5 mths ago
      When tea partiers petition their government for a redress of such grievances, as more than one million did on Sept. 12, 2009, they don't get into fights, they don't get arrested, they say "excuse me" and "thank you," they wait in hopelessly long lines for porta-johns, they pick up their trash and leave public spaces and private property exactly as they found them. No one told myself or other tea partiers to do these things; we just believe that you shouldn't hurt other people and you shouldn't take their stuff.

      In contrast OWS, whose ranks represent a small fraction of total tea party protestors, has struggled to maintain civility or to even identify a unifying sense of purpose in their uprising. At Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan, there is stealing, property damage and arrests often provoked by protestors wanting conflict with the police. Real people—not members of the so-called 1%—are being hurt as their small businesses are impacted and their property destroyed.
      • MSNBC 5 mths ago
        This argument proves no justification in the police state action of targeting the protest as a whole, and crushing it.

        Just like the middle ages.
      • K 5 mths ago
        Police State Action...Please!
      • Bill S 5 mths ago
        Somali Army Vet is a good commie!
    • bob f  •  Muskegon, Michigan  •  5 mths ago
      Anyone but me find it compleye arragants that they sue for free speech violations while this same groups heckles and shouts dowun people who do not agree with them. .
    • Andrew  •  Canton, Ohio  •  5 mths ago
      I have to laugh, this story says how the dirtbags are suing that their right of freedom of speech was violated, and right below it--right below it!--on Yahoo is a story of how these same liberal hypocrites crashed a Michelle Bachmann speech and shouted her down. I guess her freedom of speech doesn't count. Typical liberals!
    • Herb  •  Mesa, Arizona  •  5 mths ago
      If figures now that you mention the ACLU of Northern California. Your ACLU crusades are as bad as the ambulance chasing lawyers looking to make a fast buck. Where is your patriotism?
      Show me anyplace else on earth where a protester can sue over the right of free speech. Why do you think people from around the world clamor to come here? Have the "occupying protestors" ever been to war? Have they ever been anyplace outside of their own homes? Apparently not. If they had, they would realize that peaceful protesting can best be done at the polling booth in 2012 and not in city parks or waterfronts. Do you not understand how many men and women since 1776 have fought for the very rights you so blatantly babble about? If you don't like it here, pack your bags and head for Venezuela or North Korea. Maybe you would feel
      free then.
    • Tyler  •  Rapid City, South Dakota  •  5 mths ago
      The taxpayers should sue OWS for the untold millions in cleanup costs and additional law enforcement that was needed during their human filth-a-thon.

      Funny how these idiots somehow think blocking traffic, spitting on cops, crapping on cop cars, breaking windows, tresspassing, littering, and setting buildings on fire are all forms of "free speech."
    • Larry  •  5 mths ago
      Handout demanding deadbeats and their lawyers........hard to say which is the lower life form, but either would be much improved by a good country **s kicking to clear their entitled attitude.
    • Pamela Bunting Lewis  •  5 mths ago
      Really it is the lawyers who are the problem in this country. Occupy the Legal Offices now. Pam 12/22/11
    • MSNBC  •  Cincinnati, Ohio  •  5 mths ago
      Once against censored on this channel owned by Rothschild... NWO is real.

      With the passing of The Act of 1879 Washington D.C. was turned into a sovereign corporate municipal. It is not subjugated to the law of the "Constitution for the united states."

      Source: The Act of 1879 (original document available online)

      An oppressive roman law: Lexi Fori became the law of the land along with maritime law.

      The constitution was re-written in Washington D.C. with the new heading, "THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES." The capitalization validates the corporate status.

      As a means of payment for the debt incurred during the Civil War the district was given to the global private bankers (the financers of the war.) Washington is owned by Rothschild.

      Through a series of tactful manipulations, and deceitful measure the entity UNITED STATES INC. (notice INCORPORATED) has unlawfully usurped the legitimate law of the land "the Constitution for the united states."

      Why do you think it is that every president and politician seems to act in interests against the will of the majority of the population? Stupidity? Nope. He is doing what he is supposed to be doing while residing as the president of another Rothschild Corporation.

      Ever wonder why we are always getting into wars that we don't support? Or that we don't belong in? Or that just don't make any sense? It's because the banksters are getting rich off this scheme, and have an agenda for global domination.
    • Independant Thinker  •  5 mths ago
      The folk with the new resturant that was put out of business should sue OWS.
    • tom  •  Issaquah, Washington  •  5 mths ago
      Aressts:
      Obamas OWS - 5000 and counting
      Tea Party - 0
      Think about this when you vote in 2012. Bye, bye obama
    • Christopher  •  Cleveland, Ohio  •  5 mths ago
      Protesting and free assembly are one thing, but moving in and living in a park is something totally separate. They call that squatting, when you live somewhere that you don't have actually have the right to live. Also, just because we have the right to free assembly, there still are local laws that govern that right to some degree. You can't for instance, just start a demonstration on a downtown street in the middle of rush hour. And lest we not forget, you people are basically protesting democracy, free enterprise, and the right for companies to make money, which is really good for us all. If you want equal pay and social status for everyone, perhaps you need to move to one of the socialist countries in Europe, where if you make a decent amount of money you give half of it to the government through taxes, and if you don't then you get to live off the system for free.
    • EricH  •  5 mths ago
      There is the fundamental right to protest, but there is not a right to live in the park! There are people that already live there, they are called homeless.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  5 mths ago
      Oh please. Now the Communist Democrats are trying to say conservatives are Red. It isn't going to fly you Marxist slime.
    • The Dumbocrat Twins  •  Brooklyn, New York  •  5 mths ago
      Perhaps the real 99%, also known as working people, should sue the bOWelS movement for the tax dollars. That went into cleaning up all the poop they left behind and the extra police man hours wasted on them while they ran around playing revolutionary. .
    • J  •  5 mths ago
      Just because someone has more than you doesn't give you the right to protest that person's successes!
      Liberal DOLTS!
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...