Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Oscar night: How are the winners picked?

    The world's biggest awards ceremony, unfolding this year on Feb. 26, has a history of playing it safe

    When did the Oscars begin?
    The first Academy Awards ceremony was held in May 1929, over dinner at Hollywood's Roosevelt Hotel. It was attended by 270 people, including some who paid a $5 fee as guests of those with invitations, and was hosted by silent-movie actor Douglas Fairbanks, who handed out the awards in just a few minutes. The 15 winners had been disclosed three months earlier, and the very first Oscar — a 13-inch-tall gold-plated statuette designed by MGM's art director, Cedric Gibbons — had already been presented to German actor Emil Jannings, who had sailed to Europe a few weeks before. The silent-movie star was actually the runner-up in the leading-actor category. Celebrity dog Rin Tin Tin had picked up more votes, but was denied the award by an embarrassed academy.

    How did the Oscar get its name?
    Legend has it that a librarian at the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which awards the prizes, took a peek at a statuette and said, "Gee! He looks just like my Uncle Oscar." The name stuck, and so did the "Little Man," which remains the single most prized award in the movie business. And this year's 84th Oscar ceremony will be much like the previous 83, with studio bosses, actors, directors, sound editors, and makeup artists doing their utmost to be called up on stage. Their fate rests on the votes of the Academy's members, whose numbers have climbed from 36 in 1927 to 5,783 today.

    SEE MORE: Will Michelle Williams' 'sexy' GQ cover help her Oscar chances?

     

    How do you become a member?
    You're either invited to join after being nominated for an Oscar, or you're elected by at least two other members for your services to the film industry. Members join for life, making the Academy a large and unwieldy band: Among those in this select club are anonymous insiders, major Hollywood players like Steven Spielberg, and the occasional outlier, like Mother Dolores Hart, a 73-year-old Benedictine nun who appeared opposite Elvis Presley in 1957's Loving You.

    How does the Academy vote?
    It has used the same Byzantine voting system since 1936. In stage one — choosing the nominees — members of the Academy's 15 branches vote in their own fields. So directors vote for Best Director, cinematographers for Best Cinematography, and so on, with each voter naming five choices in order of preference. (Everyone gets to nominate for Best Picture). Using a complex system to weight the votes, auditing firm PricewaterhouseCoopers then tabulates the results and determines the top five nominees in each category — or the top nine, in the case of Best Picture. Stage two — choosing the winner — is simpler. All members are allowed to vote in each category, and the nominee with the most ballots wins the statuette.

    SEE MORE: Petty controversy: The Oscars diss singing Muppets

     

    What's wrong with the system?
    Not only is it confusing even to the members of the Academy, it produces some very puzzling results. The movie industry's most prestigious honor somehow managed to elude Orson Welles, Alfred Hitchcock, Richard Burton, Cary Grant, and Greta Garbo. Academy voters chose How Green Was My Valley over Citizen Kane in 1942, and Rocky ahead of Taxi Driver in 1977. Critics of the Oscars say the Academy's voters routinely discriminate against certain genres — comedies, science fiction, and Westerns — and shrink from any kind of controversy and "brave" filmmaking, instead favoring strong, crowd-pleasing story lines. Popularity, in other words, often trumps art.

    How is the system to blame?
    The biggest problem is that the average Academy member is 57, white, male, and looking for his next Hollywood project. Only a minority, some 1,500, are actors or directors. The rest are the producers, set builders, visual-effects specialists, sound guys, and PR execs that make the industry tick. They're known as the "steak eaters," because they're mostly red-blooded males, and when it comes to the decisive second round of voting, they are by far the Academy's largest voting bloc. "Call it the steak-eater vote, call it the old-geezer vote, call it the babe vote. They always vote for the babes," says Jeffrey Wells, who runs Hollywood-Elsewhere.com. Steak eaters are not big fans of films with gay or foreign themes, like Brokeback Mountain or Munich, and in any given year, about 700 of them will be associated with an Oscar-nominated film, quietly lobbying their peers on its behalf.

    SEE MORE: 7 curious facts about the 2012 Oscar nominees

     

    Does winning matter?
    You bet. In crude financial terms, winning an Oscar, or even being nominated, can have a huge effect on a film's success. U.S. ticket sales for Slumdog Millionaire jumped more than 200 percent when it was nominated, in 2009. Studies have shown that nominations alone can extend a film's presence in cinemas for weeks. At the real business end of Hollywood, however, Oscars are a bonus but don't massively boost the grosses of box-office smashes. Of the top 50 grossing films of all time, just three have won Best Picture: Titanic, Forrest Gump, and Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.

    How to win an Oscar
    When it comes to winning an Academy Award, it pays to be a drama queen. A study by the University of California, Los Angeles, and Harvard University found that performers who appear in a drama rather than a comedy are nine times more likely to be nominated for an award. And actresses are twice as likely to be nominated as their male co-stars. "Because there are fewer female than male performers in films, and both are eligible for the same number of awards, actresses stand a better chance," said sociologist Nicole Esparza. "It's simple arithmetic." Perversely, not showing up at the ceremony — a sure sign that you're an established megastar — can also improve your chances. Marlon Brando didn't pick up his Oscar for The Godfather in 1973. Paul Newman turned down an invite in 1987, convinced he wouldn't win on his seventh attempt. And when Woody Allen's Annie Hall won Best Picture in 1978, he was already tucked into bed in New York, having unplugged the phone and soothed himself to sleep by reading Conversations With Carl Jung.

    SEE MORE: 2012 Oscar nominations: 5 burning questions

     

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    9 comments

    • Carlos  •  3 mths ago
      They are picked by whoever has the best knee-pads on that day.....
    • WilliamH  •  Wallingford, Connecticut  •  3 mths ago
      I gave up watching the Oscars when Ordinary People beat out Raging Bull based on a sympathy vote for Mary Tyler Moore's loss of her son. The arawds are strictly political and naturally skewed to the left because liberal Hollywood does all the voting.
      • Rudi 3 mths ago
        Your explanation makes no sense. If the sympathy vote was all that mattered, Moore would have won Best Actress; instead, she lost to Sissy Spacek. Obviously you know nothing about how the Oscars actually work.
      • Paige 3 mths ago
        ORDINARY PEOPLE beat out RAGING BULL because it Robert Redford's directorial debut, and the Academy loves to honor its own members when they step outside their comfort zone. (Warren Beatty and Kevin Costner later followed Redford with Oscar wins as directors -- although none of them has ever won an acting Oscar.)
    • ks  •  3 mths ago
      If your nose was nominated, would it be picked?
    • Rudi  •  3 mths ago
      Dunno 'bout anybody else, but all I got was a headline.
    • Mike  •  Columbus, Ohio  •  3 mths ago
      Selection process begins: Liberal? - in; OBAMA Supporter? - In; Conservative? -OUT!
    • Richard D  •  San Antonio, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      Who cares?
    • Mike  •  Eugene, Oregon  •  3 mths ago
      Oscar awards are as political as schit is in Washington and about as dishonest. I went to see the Descendants movie with George Clooney and left after 20-30 minutes. The movie was not working and Clooney is the most over-rated actor since Robert Redford. Both are women favorites and both are decent directors and bright guys, but as actors they are only average. They get way too much hype for their supposed acting abilities. Clooney in particular is way over-rated as nice a guy as he might be. See, that's the problem when you live in a culture like ours, no one can be honest, well, almost no one. Being nice, bright and handsome is great but that is not enough to make want deemed a good actor. HIs emotional range really suffers as far as I can tell. He does not come across as real. He can not plumb to real emotional depths to get to a character. Sorry, he does not cut it. But I am not surprised. This is the culture that supposedly elected BushBabyKins twice. Need I say more?
    • Joey JoJo Shabadoo  •  Chicago, Illinois  •  3 mths ago
      Here's how they are picked:

      Take the 20 top critically acclaimed films. Give them all 100 points.

      1) Plus 20 if the subject involves races and cultures other than white middle-class America.
      2) Minus 20 if there aren't any explosions, gunplay or killing.
      3) Plus 30 if the lead character is black. Add another 20 if the lead is female.
      4) Minus 10 if the subject involves right-leaning ideals of hard work, self-reliance, and frugality.
      5) Plus 20 if the film is produced, written or directed by Stephen Spielberg.
      6) Minus 20 if Sean Hannity says he likes the movie.
      7) Plus 15 if the soundtrack has some element of hip-hop. Add another 25 if it is produced by Jay Z.
      8) Minus 25 if the lead is a white, non-Jewish male.
      9) Plus 30 if the focus of the movie supports a leftist agenda like welfare, multiculturalism or anti-war.
      10) Minus 100 if Mel Gibson was involved.
      • Petercha 3 mths ago
        Couldn't have said it better myself, Joey!
      • Nephilim 3 mths ago
        Sad but true.
    • Mayday  •  New York, New York  •  3 mths ago
      I liked Hugo. Short on message and long on entertainment. It was fun to watch