Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Pa. family fights US over rare 1933 gold coins

    PHILADELPHIA (AP) — A jeweler's heirs with a cache of rare $20 gold coins will fight for the right to keep them when they square off in court this week against the U.S. Treasury.

    Treasury officials charge that the never-circulated "double eagles" were stolen from the U.S. Mint in Philadelphia in 1933. They could be worth $80 million or more, given that one sold for nearly $7.6 million in 2002.

    The coins come from a batch that were struck but melted down after President Franklin D. Roosevelt took the country off the gold standard in 1933.

    Two were preserved for the Smithsonian Institute. But a handful more mysteriously got out.

    The daughter and grandsons of Israel Switt, a jeweler and scrap metal dealer on nearby Jeweler's Row, say they discovered 10 of them in his bank deposit box in 2003.

    Joan Langbord of Philadelphia and her sons went to the U.S. Treasury to authenticate the coins, but the government instead seized them. Authorities noted that the box was rented six years after Switt died in 1990, and that the family never paid inheritance taxes on them.

    What's more, the Secret Service has long believed Switt and a corrupt cashier at the Mint were somehow involved in the double-eagle breach.

    "A thief cannot convey good title to stolen property," Assistant U.S. Attorney Joel M. Sweet wrote.

    The 2011 trial that starts Thursday might therefore have echoes of a 1930s-era criminal case.

    Double eagles, first struck in 1850, feature a flying eagle on one side and a figure representing liberty on the other. They get their name from their $20 value, twice that of gold coins known as eagles. Collectors would love to see the 1933 coins go to auction since they are so rare.

    Lawyer Barry Berke, who represents the Langbords, won a 50-50 split with the government in the only other double eagle case, involving the coin that was sold at auction $7.59 million.

    He argues that the family's coins could have left the Mint legally, since it was permissible to exchange gold coins for gold bullion.

    The government instead insists that no double eagles lawfully left the Mint, and that the coins were legally seized. The coins are being kept at Fort Knox.

    Switt had been investigated at least twice by 1944 over his coin holdings.

    In 1937, U.S. officials seized nearly 100 pre-1933 double eagles from him as he prepared to board a train to Baltimore to meet with a coin dealer. Switt said he knew it was illegal to possess the gold coins, and said he had eventually planned to surrender them, according to a ruling issued by the trial judge this week.

    In 1944, the Secret Service traced 10 separate double eagle coins that had surfaced to Switt. He acknowledged selling nine of them, but said he did not recall how he had gotten them. The statute of limitations prevented authorities from prosecuting Switt.

    However, his license to deal scrap gold, which sometimes took him to the Mint, was revoked.

    U.S. District Judge Legrome Davis will allow that evidence in, despite the family's efforts to block it.

    "The documents appropriately go to Switt's knowledge of the repercussions from breaking the gold laws and provide evidence of a motive to conceal his possession of the ten 1933 Double Eagles presently at issue," Judge Legrome Davis wrote.

    The trial is expected to last two to three weeks.

    "What the Langbords are trying to say here is it's not clear what happened, that there's at least a possibility the coins were just exchanged for ounces of gold," said Armen R. Vartien, general counsel of the Professional Numismatists Guild.

    "The records are incomplete, inconclusive," he said. "No one can really know what happened, and none of the people involved are alive to tell (the tale)."

     
     
    Top Locations Pleasanton

    179 comments

    • YASIN  •  9 mths ago
      i have sum coins for sell
    • Dawn F  •  9 mths ago
      I'd be scared they'd replicate them with fake gold and then give them back to the family...nothing surprises me anymore..
    • ToddUncommon  •  10 mths ago
      Hey #$%$ it's Smithsonian InstituTION, not Institute. It actually does matter to get it right.
    • Professor Wizard  •  10 mths ago
      Well.... The family took the coins to the Government to have them Authenticated.... and THAT is EXACTLY what the Government did... The coins are now officially announced Authentic by the US Government! Lesson learned - - if you find coins, take them to a coin dealer - do NOT take them to the Government!
    • The White Nissan Guy  •  10 mths ago
      More stupid reporters. Roosevelt did not take the country off the gold standard in 1933. He outlawed private possession of gold. (Illegally, of course. He had no authority to do so.) Johnson took us off the gold standard in the 60s, thus beginning the inflation that has been with us ever since.

      Thank you again, Democrats, for ignoring the law.
      • Gary 10 mths ago
        100% agree, but let's be fair, the Republicans' record on keeping the law isn't any better.
      • tas54fe 10 mths ago
        actually sir Roosevelt did take away the gold standard when he abandoned printing currency equal only to the amount of gold in possession. At that point the dollar began devaluing as we printed more money than we had gold.
      • Eric 10 mths ago
        @Tas54fe: Actually, you're BOTH wrong. It was Nixon in 1971 when the ability to evenly trade gold for currency was dissolved entirely. @ Gary: You're right. (R)'s and (D)'s just don't matter anymore. Even though Nixon was a registered "Republican", he acted quite liberal (Vietnam withdrawal, US/ "Red" China relations, &c.). We need to get back to having commodity-backed currency, no matter whether it's gold (NOT going to happen), silver (more likely), corn, wheat, pork bellies, or what else have you.
    • 1488HATERNATION  •  Pleasanton, California  •  4 mths ago
      if them are real 1933 gold coin's they would easily fetch maybe 100million+
    • tree bunny  •  10 mths ago
      #$%$ those people are screwed..the Goverment is going to keep them coins one way or the other.
    • cjb  •  10 mths ago
      The government is falsely claiming that the coins were stolen. There's no reason at all to believe Switt didn't receive them in trade for bullion or for cash at the mint. It was illegal to possess the coins then, but it is not illegal any longer. Switt was not a thief, he merely defied FDR's scandalous scheme to take gold out of the hands of ordinary Americans.
      • 1488HATERNATION 4 mths ago
        It was illegal to possess the coins then, but it is not illegal any longer.
        better re-read that law/info
    • Jay  •  10 mths ago
      Never tell the government a goddamn thing, Heres a lesson in keeping your mouth shut.
      • Jay 10 mths ago
        what kinda scum bag gives this a thumbs down
    • Mike  •  10 mths ago
      Hope they get the Casey Anthony Jury...
    • khill05  •  10 mths ago
      Never let the government know you have money, they will find a way to take it.
      • Bob 10 mths ago
        Absolutely!!
      • Bob 10 mths ago
        Have to check on this.. I heard a commentator the other day that most people did not surrender their gold coins to the government thieves. On July 15, the trading of gold and silver will be prohibited from Dodd and Frank. They do not want us to have hard assets. History is repeating itself. FDR has arisen from the dead.
    • socalyard  •  10 mths ago
      Uhh Gary..... "The government instead insists that no double eagles lawfully left the Mint". If that can be proven then these people are screwed. I would think that if that is true and this is the family of a proven coin thief, then the government has a strong case.

      Obviously I would much rather have these people win so that they can make some money but if you think they should just be allowed to keep stolen money because it has been so long then you are crazy.
      • schmee 10 mths ago
        Sins of the fathers shall not be visited on their children
      • deminimis 10 mths ago
        @schmee So then if I steal your car, manage to keep it hidden until I die then I'm free to leave it to my family?
      • A Yahoo! User 10 mths ago
        'Statute of Limitations' are only for criminal prosecutions. They can still seize unlawfully obtained goods.
    • dave dulaney  •  10 mths ago
      1933 to 2011 I'd think think that the statute of limitations has run out. Besides our elected officials rob us everyday and we can't sieze thier wealth. I think its time to take back our government and imprision our corrupt politicians
    • Gary  •  10 mths ago
      If you think this is wrong, you're right. The government hasn't proven the coins were stolen, much less that Switt stole them. They just say they were. Maybe they were given to someone as a memento.

      Either Americans are comfortable with the rapid and blatant erosion of liberty, or they are too cowardly to oppose it and, at the very least, vote for someone who isn't a Democrat or Republican. The idiocy that holds that these are the only two choices and that we must choose between the lesser of two evils is nearly finished destroying our great nation. On the one hand, you have the Republicans who want to rob you at gunpoint to finance their personal wars of profit, and on the other, you have the Democrats, who want to rob you at gunpoint and give your money to someone who didn't earn it. Conveniently, they swap power every few years.

      If you think they are not in collusion, you are too far gone to be helped.
    • Anthony  •  10 mths ago
      Apparently many who are posting comments here didn't read the part of the story that says the records are incomplete and inconclusive regarding exactly how the coins left the mint and ended up in the possession of this family. If the government has records to PROVE the coins were stolen, that's one thing. On the other hand, if all they can do is infer that the coins were stolen because such coins were never officially put into mass circulation - that sounds pretty circumstantial to me.
    • we're screwed  •  10 mths ago
      After 70 years, does anyone think the government has a clue whats going on here? Its obvious that they have honed their skills on how to steal from their citizens. They keep form in top notch shape when it comes to that.

      I have also wondered about the statute of limitations also.
    • mark  •  10 mths ago
      This just points out one of the greatest crimes in US History. When the Government stole peoples gold and gave them paper. Even steven. Yeah right.
    • American Patriot  •  10 mths ago
      And once the government gets them, they'll probably end up in the hands of some very rich people via auction.
    • DaveHowell  •  10 mths ago
      statute of limitations long since expired. leave the people to their coins.
    • farmgirl  •  10 mths ago
      All the government has to do is say the coins are somehow associated with the drug trade and they can keep them no matter what anyone says.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]