Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Is PolitiFact's 'Lie of the Year' a lie itself?

    The Pulitzer-winning fact-checker angers liberals by giving top untruth honors to the Democratic claim that Paul Ryan and Co. voted to "end" Medicare

    Celebrated fact-checking organization PolitiFact, which won a Pulitzer Prize for its coverage of the 2008 election, unveiled its "Lie of the Year" on Tuesday, and for the third year running, the top fib is about government-managed health care. Unlike the last two winners — GOP claims that the Democrats' health care reform plan created "death panels" (2009) and was a "government takeover of health care" (2010) — 2011's marquee lie dinged the Left. PolitiFact says the biggest lie of 2011 was the Democrats' assertion that by approving Rep. Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) controversial budget, "Republicans voted to end Medicare." The only problem, shot back indignant liberals, is that Republicans did vote to effectively end Medicare. Is the 2011 "Lie of the Year" a lie itself?

    PolitiFact should get its facts straight: It's "really awful" that with all the actual lies out there, PolitiFact is targeting "a statement that happens to be true," says Paul Krugman at The New York Times. Republicans voted for a plan that replaces the guaranteed benefits of Medicare with a system of increasingly worthless vouchers to buy private insurance. Sure, "the new scheme would still be called 'Medicare,'" but it would look nothing like Medicare as we know it. So "how is this not an end to Medicare?" Apparently, PolitiFact is so "terrified of being considered partisan" that they've chosen to become "useless and irrelevant" instead.
    "PolitiFact, R.I.P."

    Actually, it's liberals who have the facts wrong: Given PolitiFact's Democratic bias, it's natural that "liberal fans are apoplectic," says Avik Roy at Forbes. But their assertion that voucherizing Medicare "ends" the program "is, plainly, ridiculous." When Britain privatized British Rail in 1993, "the railway did not cease to exist," it just switched to an alternate mode of delivering the same service. The same is true of Ryan's plan, but I guess "would-be liberal demagogues" don't think "privatization" is a scary enough word anymore.
    "Republicans 'ending Medicare' is PolitiFact's 2011 Lie of the Year"

    Both sides are just playing with language: Ryan's plan "fundamentally changes the nature" of Medicare, says Adam Sorensen at TIME. Whether that constitutes an "end" to the program is, ultimately, "a semantic distinction." Of course, PolitiFact is relying "on the same tenuous semantics" to award its top-lie honor to the Democrats. So regardless of whether the end-Medicare claim stretches the truth too far, it looks like PolitiFact "chose it for its political potency rather than for the depth or deviousness of its deception."
    "PolitiFact's Semantic Distinction of the Year: Ending Medicare"

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    35 comments

    • Beer!  •  Portland, United States  •  5 mths ago
      ok so when was the last time a voucher system paid for by the congress worked?... the cbo even said that most senoirs (new ones) would have to pay about 8-10 k out of pocket because healthcare costs always go up, they never go down ever, and who has an extra 8-10k a yr to pay for that ?...so i would say that fundementaly ends medicare as we know it today ...same name different animal altogether !
    • facedecoolo  •  Pittsburgh, United States  •  5 mths ago
      I agree with Paul Ryan and I adopted his doublespeak. You see, I'm a Republican. I broke up with my girlfriend, but I still call her my girlfriend because, yes, she is a girl and I am friendly toward her. She cried like hell about it, but I'm sticking with my Luntzian sloganeering to avoid blame.
    • Circe  •  Fresno, United States  •  5 mths ago
      So, all you seniors out there today- are you willing to take a "voucher program" over the Medicare you presently have? Would you consider it to be the SAME thing or completely different?
      • Tampa Jim 5 mths ago
        Hell no. Medicare works very well for me. I'd hate to give the present system up and have to deal insurance companies again.
      • pdc 5 mths ago
        I bet you get called a socialist a lot for enjoying the benefits of something you paid into all your life with statements like that.
    • Buddha  •  5 mths ago
      By Politifact's logic, if RyanDon'tCare changed Medicare into a system where the government handed out two aspirin for every ailment, since it would still be "an entitlement system", and still called "Medicare", therefore his plan couldn't be considered to "end" Medicare. Completely ludicrous. Medicare is a guaranteed-benefit government-run single-payer health insurance system. RyanDon'tCare has the government give out a coupon and with a pat on the butt tells elderly almost certainly with existing health issues to "now go buy private insurance, good luck with that", throwing elderly into HMO profit centers, where the TRUE death panels are, filled with corporate bean-counters.

      The analogy in the article about the rail system is also false. At the end of the day there, it was still a train. This analogy would be like taking a train system and getting rid of it, and in compensation handing out coupons to everyone to help defray them buying a car and then saying "we didn't change anything, it is still transportation".
    • Ninety-Nine Percent  •  Atlanta, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Let's see. An 80 year old in failing health takes his/her flimsy voucher to BIG INSURANCE and asks to buy a policy. Hmmmmm. What's wrong with this picture?
      • Seriously 5 mths ago
        Why is the 80 year old's health failing??
    • DefendOurConstitution  •  5 mths ago
      So much for the "liberal" media. Politifact is run by the same lobbyists that own all the media outlets.
    • Music Player  •  5 mths ago
      False: Republicans want to end Medicare
      True: Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it.
    • Music Player  •  5 mths ago
      False: Republicans want to end Medicare
      True: Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it.
    • Music Player  •  5 mths ago
      False: Republicans want to end Medicare
      True: Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it.
    • Music Player  •  5 mths ago
      False: Republicans want to end Medicare
      True: Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it.
    • Music Player  •  5 mths ago
      False: Republicans want to end Medicare
      True: Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it.
    • Music Player  •  5 mths ago
      False: Republicans want to end Medicare
      True: Republicans want to end Medicare as we know it.
    • h2o4ever  •  5 mths ago
      A self-employed buddy of mine just went out and bought health insurace on the open market for him and his family: $1,200/mo.

      Can't see many seniors affording anything remotely near that even with a voucher to cover some of the costs. Especially considering that they will get charged a higher premium due to existing conditions and age.

      So the Ryan plan will ultimately kill Medicare and will force more seniors to be reliant on Medicaid. Not sure how that saves taxpayers any money.
    • ws  •  Cleveland, United States  •  5 mths ago
      The usual pisspoor reporting on all levels. The actual statement that politifact called their lie of the year was " They have voted to END MEDICARE AS WE KNOW IT". Now it would take a pretty unaware and naive person to not get that replacing medicare AS WE KNOW IT with vouchers isn't ending medicare as we know it. Sheesh.
      • Rasser 5 mths ago
        Uh, yes it is since there are no vouchers involved now. You don't get it, do you?
    • Robert  •  Madison, Wisconsin  •  5 mths ago
      "a semantic distinction." Ha!
      More like a semantic substitution with each side distorting what the other said.
    • g55rumpy  •  5 mths ago
      @razor you forgot yahoo "news"
    • KR  •  5 mths ago
      Okay, so a voucher system wouldn't end Medicare. It would just ruin it.
    • GBush  •  Independence, United States  •  5 mths ago
      Republicans and Politifact are liars and simply cannot be trusted.
    • Rasser  •  5 mths ago
      "Republicans voted for a plan that replaces the guaranteed benefits of Medicare with a system of increasingly worthless vouchers to buy private insurance." Destroying Medicare so they can give the rich another tax cut they don't need? The average working American will never be safe from the GOP until we have no more money to give to the rich.
    • CyberBiker  •  Little Rock, United States  •  5 mths ago
      The lie of the “liberal media” is spread by the neo-conservative media. The stated aim of the current crop of tea-bagger congressmen is to reduce the government to the size where it can be drowned in a bath tub. According to the press, they only hurt you because they love you.
      • scott 5 mths ago
        Exactly. The problem isn't the size of gov't, but who that gov't is working for.
      • Jay 5 mths ago
        If your government is so large that you can't afford it and have to raise taxes, then it is too large. In our case, most regulatory agencies do exactly the opposite of their stated purpose. The department of energy thinks of ways that it can impede the production of energy (as well as the EPA). The department of education stands in the way of local schools educating kids in a manner that is accepted by its citizens. The FDA doesn't protect us from certain drugs (like tobacco/cigarettes), it just taxes them. The EPA doesn't protect the environment, it is used primarily as a weapon against manufacturing and energy production (currently, they are implementing Cap and Trade without congressional approval!). HHS is supposed to improve the care that people receive; instead, it is in the process of taking over our system and making sure that more people are covered, but with a lesser quality of care. The department of justice is hardly promoting justice (selectively prosecuting CIA and military personnel for punching a terrorist in the face, but not prosecuting black panthers in Philadelphia for keeping white people away from voting stations, which I am sure would be treated totally different if the races were reversed. Furthermore, you have Fast and Furious, and Holder's flip flopping on the issue of whether Obamacare is a tax or not). Most of these agencies were established under the guise of protecting the populace, but are now used as liberal weapons against the populace. Reducing the size of these departments and sharpening their focus would be a big expense reduction without a downside.
      • KansasRepub 5 mths ago
        @Jay,
        Your head seems to be stuck in your anal orifice. As you point out, these Government agencies were created to protect the general populace, not to make it easier for large corporations to abuse the people, or religious zealots to define what education is.