YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Possible Privacy Violations of Verizon's Cell Phone Tracking Program

    Capitalizing on all the information we put into our cell phones, Verizon Wireless is selling all our app usage and location information to marketers, reports CNET's Declan McCullagh. Part of what it calls the Precision Market Insights initiative, Verizon is not only tracking consumers, it is sharing that information with other companies, and possibly linking it to databases with more of your personal information. "We're able to view just everything that they do," Bill Diggins, U.S. chief for the Verizon Wireless marketing initiative, said at an industry conference earlier this year. "And that's really where data is going today. Data is the new oil."

    RELATED: It's Not Just Google: Everyone Tracks Everyone on the Internet

    If it sounds creepy, that's because it might not be legal, even though Verizon did the bare minimum to make it sound that way by only selling the information in aggregate and also providing an opt-out feature. Still Paul Ohm, a professor at the University of Colorado Law School, who works at the Federal Trade Commission told McCullagh this might all violate federal wiretapping law because it digs deep into our cell phone transactions. As this stuff gets kind of murky, we spoke with Ryan Calo, an affiliate scholar for the Center for Internet and Society and Assistant law professor at the University of Washington, who explained how exactly this could violate the FTC's privacy guidelines (and also creep you out).

    RELATED: How Google+ is Showing It's Serious About Privacy

    There are a few things that Calo told us to consider in this situation: Anonymity, the ability to opt-out, Verizon's clarity, possible harm, and then the wire tapping issue. Verizon must comply with all of these things, not just one. "Even if you give consumers notice about a particular practice and you permit them to opt-out at least the FTC has been clear that you can't bury the lede," he told The Atlantic Wire. Let's see how the cell phone company did. 

    RELATED: The Internet Data We Would Like the Right to Forget

    Anonymity

    What Verizon Is Doing: Verizon has said that it doesn't give these marketers the information of individual customers, but does so in aggregate. For example, if a company wants to know about the behavior of 35 year old white males, they can get the cell phone behaviors of that audience, but not of a specific man in that group. 

    RELATED: Police Surveillance of Cellphones is Skyrocketing

    Does it Pass the Privacy Test? As long as the wireless carrier doesn't give specific URLs to these marketers about your specific behavior and is geared to a general audience, Calo believes that this should be fine. 

    RELATED: The iPhone Has Enslaved Mobile Carriers

    Opt-Out Option

    What Verizon Is Doing: The company does allow users to opt-out of the tracking on the Verizon Wireless websites. Users have to first sign in and head to the My Privacy section of the website. There, the subscriber will apparently find three different boxes to uncheck, as pictured below.

    Though, when we went to the site, it did not show up as such, giving us just one "do not track" button to click.

     

    Does it Pass the Privacy Test: Yes, Verizon offers an opt-out option. But the harder it is to opt-out, the more likely it is to violate FTC privacy guidelines. This confusion certainly won't help the wireless carrier's case. 

    Clarity

    What Verizon Is Doing: The company sent out emails to customers informing them of the new policy. It also has a lengthy section on its site explaining the program. 

    Does It Pass the Privacy Test: Calo compares this to a case in which Sears technically explained everything it did with a similar tracking program, but the FTC came down on it for not giving enough notice to customers. 

    Harm

    What Verizon Is Doing: It claims that the anonymity plus the ability to opt-out avoids incurring any harm on an individual.

    Does It Pass the Privacy Test: Not necessarily. "It is totally possible for you to be harmed in a way that implicates privacy, even if the person harming you doesn't know who you are," Calo told us. "Because of Verizon's Precision Market Insights, you end up getting charged more, or end up missing a deal—those are the kinds of things where it doesn't matter where they know who you are." However, he also notes that it doesn't sound like these marketers are using this information for targeted ads, but just to know more about Verizon customers, in which case it's less likely the consumer will be "harmed."

    Wiretapping

    What Verizon Is Doing: In order to give these marketers this information it is possible Verizon is doing what is called "deep packet inspection." Meaning it giving up more information than we might like. Calo explains it like this: "Verizon has no business figuring out what I'm saying. They need to be able to connect me to Gmail but they don't need to read my communications," he said.

    Does It Pass the Privacy Test: If Verizon is indeed doing that deep packet inspection, it could be violate the Wiretap act, says Calo. But, Ryan Radia, associate director of technology studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute think tank told McCullagh that he thinks the opt-out exonerates Verizon. 

     

    Loading...
    • Pilot showcases stunning photos taken from plane’s cockpit

      Dubai-based pilot Karim Nafatni has posted several pictures that provide a stunning view from inside a commercial cockpit at 37,000 feet. Nafatni told the website PetaPixel that he began bringing his Nikon D300s aboard flights when he worked as first officer to capture images from inside his own unique version of an “office.” Nafatni's website [...]

    • Greg Louganis To Tie The Knot This Fall

      Olympian Greg Louganis is engaged.

    • McDonald's Worker Says She Was Required to Receive Pay on Fee-Laden Debit Card

      Pa. McDonald's Worker Files Class Action Suit for Receiving Wages Through Debit Cards

    • Ventura wants 'American Sniper' lawsuit to proceed

      Attorneys for former Minnesota Gov. Jesse Ventura asked a federal judge Monday to allow his defamation lawsuit against slain "American Sniper" author Chris Kyle to go forward with Kyle's widow ...

    • Bear mauls Alaska man who gave it barbecue meat

      ANCHORAGE, Alaska (AP) — A black bear mauled a man at a campground in Alaska, but the animal won't likely threaten other people, the state Department of Fish and Game said.

    • Miss Utah's Pageant Answer Is the Worst You've Ever Seen

      The only time normal people seem to care about national beauty pageants is when one of the contestants messes up the question-and-answer round in the worst way possible. Well, it happened again last night at the Miss USA pageant, with Miss Utah giving an answer so bad that it eclipsed all other terrible pageant answers before her. Meet 21-year-old Marissa Powell. She is from Salt Lake City. And this is the full, cringe-worthy sequence you will be seeing a lot of this week:

    • Jack in the Box to close 67 Qdoba sites

      Jack in the Box Inc. said Monday that it will close 67 company owned Qdoba Mexican Grill restaurants by the end of September. The restaurant chain said it reviewed the market performance for its Qdoba ...

    • The Supreme Court Decided Your Silence Can Be Used Against You

      A nation continues to wait for final word on the Supreme Court's Big Four cases this term — voting rights, affirmative action, DOMA, and Proposition 8 — but the justices' closest decision arrived first on Monday, in a 5-4 ruling on Salinas v. Texas in which the conservative members of the Court and Anthony Kennedy determined that if you remain silent before police read your Miranda rights, that silence can and will be held against you. Here's what that means.

    Loading...

    Follow Yahoo! News