Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Has Ron Paul's caucus strategy failed?

    The Nevada caucuses on Saturday were a resounding win for Mitt Romney, and a pretty big loss for the three remaining Republicans in the race. In the end, Mitt's combination of "money, momentum, and Mormons" proved insurmountable, says John Avlon at The Daily Beast: Romney won 50 percent of the vote, followed (distantly) by Newt Gingrich at 21 percent and Ron Paul at 19 percent. This was an especially hard blow to Paul, whose not-so-secret strategy is to win enough delegates in small caucus states like Nevada to be a power broker at the Republican National Convention. Does Paul need to rethink his electoral plan?

    Yes. Paul failed big time in Nevada: Nevada is "a Wild West state of libertarians," seemingly "tailor-made for Ron Paul" and his army of committed, well-trained followers, says Rosie Gray at BuzzFeed. If his caucus strategy can't even put him ahead of Gingrich here, despite out-organizing and outspending Newt in Nevada, that "calls into question the whole idea that picking up delegates drop by drop is an effective tactic." Paul's not just fighting for delegates now. He's fighting for "relevance."
    "Ron Paul's caucus strategy didn't work in Nevada"

    Paul did just fine in Nevada: The real fight in the GOP race is the battle "to be the conservative alternative to Mitt Romney," says Aaron Blake at The Washington Post. And according to entrance polls, Paul won big among Republicans looking for the "true conservative" in the GOP field. Romney only won 4 percent of those voters, meaning there's a clear opening for someone — maybe someone like Paul, who took 40 percent of this vote.
    "The true conservative alternative: Ron Paul?"

    Plus, Team Paul is betting on the long game: Coming in third, behind the "nearly nonexistent operation of Newt Gingrich," is "a significant setback for Paul," says Garrett Quinn at Reason. But there's "a bright spot": Paulites are well versed in the intricacies of "the state delegate process, while most campaigns appear to be focused on just the ballot box." The upshot? Despite coming in third place, Paul and Co. are "giddy" over their promising efforts to elect delegates to the state convention —  which would mean more delegates at the national convention in August.
    "Ron Paul limps to third in Nevada"

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     
    • JordanK  •  Conway, Arkansas  •  3 mths ago
      Don't pay attention to these lies.. Nevada Caucuses were rigged anyway...
    • freewill  •  3 mths ago
      Ron Paul has'nt failed, The enemies of our Constitution has succeeded.
      • Sonichu 3 mths ago
        "Is it two-ply?"

        - Barack Obama
      • Becky 3 mths ago
        Great post, Freewill. :)
    • Rozwaldo  •  Santa Barbara, California  •  3 mths ago
      Actually the public caucus counts like Adelson were a resounding win for Ron Paul. The secret counts and recounts were resounding wins for Romney. Why no, I'm not suspicious at all. The fact that Paul got 70% of the vote in Adelson and less than 20% overall seems perfectly logical to me.
      • Sibelius 3 mths ago
        The count is in, Rozzy. Paul lost. Sorry if that harshes your mellow . . . go take another hit and you'll feel better.
      • Rozwaldo 3 mths ago
        Haha yeah it totally harshes my mellow. Bro, I would share my piece with you but I lent it the Nevada GOP a few days ago. They told me they counted better when they were high.
      • Sibelius 3 mths ago
        hehehehe ok, Roz, that's cool. At least you're having fun with this.

        Now cmon, be honest. You support Ron Paul because you want legal drugs. No sense hiding it, we all know that's the truth. You want to be able to buy weed at 7/11 on Saturday nights, and that's why you like Paul, right?
    • Fred  •  Arden, North Carolina  •  3 mths ago
      I will be there for ron Paul 2012!
      Just donated another $500.00
      Gonna sell all my worthless chinese crap and donate that too!
      Thanks Mr. Paul for fighting against the NDAA!
      With the sighning of that law, Obama and all of the politicians that supported it commited treason!
      They all broke their promise to uphold the US Constitution!
    • C  •  3 mths ago
      Nevada had a 1.5% voter turnout. 1.5%. 33,000 out of 2.25 million. That sickens me.
      • C 3 mths ago
        They should award delegates from states, based on the amount of voters that come out.
      • Sibelius 3 mths ago
        I agree, C. If more voters would have come out, Paul would have gotten even a lower percentage.
    • Time2go  •  Cincinnati, Ohio  •  3 mths ago
      I'll admit that some of my fellow RP supporters lean a little heavy to the conspiracy theory side, but what is also abundantly clear is that the anti Paul folks are capable of nothing but name calling. You have no lucid argument, or at least you don't post them. I have yet to see a solid argument against his policies ANYWHERE. The fact that you would prefer candidates who would strip our constitutional rights, send our young people to fight unconstitutional wars, and have a fiscal policy built on WORTHLESS PAPER, makes me very happy that I don't know you personally.
      • harry nutzack 3 mths ago
        how about this as a start: his reading of the constitution is flawed. example: please refer to article 1 section 10. it states no state shall "coin" money, then states it allows states to issue gold and silver coin as an instrument of debt payment. to "coin" money is to produce the plates to print bills. its an archaic term now, but fairly common back in the late 18th century. his argument that the constitution demands a gold backed currency is erroneous at best, a blatant fabrication at worst.... hows that?
      • Elaine 3 mths ago
        Nutzack...good name for you
      • Sibelius 3 mths ago
        How ironic. A paulbot says other people have no arguments against Paul but just call names. Another person immediately comes up with a legitimate argument against Paul, and a Paulbot responds by insulting him. You sock puppets can't even get your tag-team drone responses right.
    • Rob  •  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania  •  3 mths ago
      Ron Paul's lack of support is from the GOP. He's not running as anything other at this point. The Republican party is a pack of idiots and hypocrites and Ron Paul just might make them stick to the slogans they love to parrot. That's the problem.Paul's problem isn't the American people. It's the Republican party. In 08, when Paul was polling at @8% in the GOP primaries, Sean Hannity called him insane, on national TV, after one debate interview because Paul said the story of WMDs was unproven and the Iraq war was costing way too much. Paul was right, honest and being conservative but a phony conservative like Hannity wins everytime because the other half of the GOP that isn't Hannity (a captious and cynical overpaid commentor on the news), the other half of the GOP is a pack of backward #$%$ rubes, fearful suburbanites and uneducated chimps, who have no ambition to investigate anything beyond the headlines or sound bites offered by the corporate media. The dichotomy of the republican party is the wealthy corporatists who make slogans like "free market". And the other half are the dopes who send chain emails that President Obama is a Nazi Ethiopian, Communist Czar who is trying to take their guns and raise their taxes! Jeezuz! Can't anyone see that stupidity is the sea that today's GOP leadership swims in? The GOP leaders count on the useful idiots of the radical right wing and Paul does not. Ron Paul's problem is he is trying to be an honest "republican"! It's a contradiction in terms ferchissakes!! I don't doubt Ron Paul's sincerity. Nor do I doubt most of his ideology. But I doubt any real conservative would gain the nomination from a party of captious selfish jerks, like the 21st century GOP.
    • incredulous  •  Burnt Hills, New York  •  3 mths ago
      The economy is about to crash. Our country is bankrupt. Millions are out of work. The discrepancy between rich and poor is massive. Why would anyone vote for someone who is going to conduct business as usual once elected?
    • Kay  •  Morgantown, West Virginia  •  3 mths ago
      Maybe so, but at least he is organized enough to get his name on the ballot in all the states unlike 2 other candidates.
    • ab  •  Jackson, Mississippi  •  3 mths ago
      I don't like to insult anyone but so far it appears that lower IQ folks don't get Paul's message. These are the followers who vote anyone who is leading or babbles on about how they have the potential to still hand out govt. freebies while balancing the budget at the same time. Simple math shows that is impossible but then again, lower IQ....
    • Richard  •  3 mths ago
      What happens when super-pacs are run by the owners of media outlets who pay themselves to run their own ads?
    • JP Tyson  •  3 mths ago
      Ron Paul hasn't failed, the country is too weak to accept true freedom from the shackles of an over reaching government. The politicans have built a dependency culture. Most americans are now too weak to make it on their own without the gov teat to suck on
    • Robert  •  3 mths ago
      But then again he did beat Santorum. Did Billy Graham just endorse Santorum.
    • steveh  •  3 mths ago
      I notice lots of people go on the comment section of Ron Paul articles, call people names, try to act superior and intelligent, try to make fun of Ron Paul supporters, make insults, call the candidate names, try to start arguments, etc. It's very puzzling to me. What kind of a person finds that to be fun? Some of you like to tell me your motivations? I'm just curious because I don't see this type of behavior going on in the comments section for the other candidates. If you don't care for Ron paul and his supporters, why do you hang out with them? Just a mean streak?
    • clipper  •  3 mths ago
      Ron Paul will come in 1st or 2nd in Maine.
    • Martin D-28  •  Florence, Massachusetts  •  3 mths ago
      Why are you so scared of RON PAUL? Is it because he pulls about 60% of the independent voters the majority in America? The caucuses are just GOP voters for the most part. If he can gather say 24% of the republican vote and 60% of the independent and 10% of the democrats her could win the election as an independent.
    • RealVoiceReason  •  3 mths ago
      Fighting for relevance? How did Ron Paul do in 2008? Oh, yeah, he got 13% how did McCain do? yes, 12%. Who won the state? Mitt Who won the nomination? McCain.

      Everyone but the author knows Nevada is Mitt's state. Duh. Guess what, Mitt did worse this this time. Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

      Ron Paul - still has the most relevant message.
    • Retired Military  •  3 mths ago
      It's only a matter of time
    • Hello  •  Haviland, Kansas  •  3 mths ago
      Judging from the comments on this forum the politicians are correct...The average american voter is uninformed and will vote for whoever is on top at the time so as not to appear stupid. So follow the media and vote as you are told...................I however have studied the facts and will be supporting Ron Paul......good-day !!
    • Wags  •  3 mths ago
      We'll continue to spread our message that the Federal Reserve is a criminal banking cartel, the wars are based on lies, the police state is endangering our freedom, the welfare state is immoral, and the government is responsible for our economic woes, regardless of the questionable results of the Nevada caucuses.