Digital movie locker `UltraViolet' nears launch

Related Quotes
Symbol Price Change
AAPL 256.87 +4.70
BBY 33.99 +0.53
CMCSA 17.96 -0.12
DIS 34.32 +0.41
GE 15.24 +0.09

LOS ANGELES – A group of media and electronics companies will soon start testing a system that will let you watch the movies you buy wherever you are, regardless of formats and other technical hurdles. Like ATMs, your account would follow you, no matter what brand of machine you use.

The group has also come up with a name for the open standard it is creating, which it was unveiling Tuesday: UltraViolet.

The open standard backed by movie studios including Warner Bros. and technology companies such as Microsoft Corp. represents a challenge to proprietary formats from Apple Inc. and others. Those formats lock buyers of video content to limited numbers of devices, such as the iPad or Apple TV.

Backers of the Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem hope to kickstart growth of digital movie purchases, now just 4 percent of all sales, by freeing consumers of format concerns.

That would mirror the way that the use of automated teller machines exploded once all banks cooperated in processing transactions, said Mitch Singer, the chief technology officer for Sony Pictures Entertainment and president of the consortium, the Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem.

The concept is to create a digital locker that stores tokens that are proofs of purchase of DVDs, Blu-ray discs and movie downloads. When a consumer buys a movie online or at a store, he can watch it anywhere else, including on any mobile device or TV set without the hassle of copying his personal files.

The UltraViolet brand is meant to evoke the platform's invisible presence, and transcendence across numerous devices.

"It's outside the visible spectrum, but it's all around you and it's ubiquitous," Singer said.

Specifications for a proposed common file format will be released soon, and testing of the system with an unnamed retailer will begin by the end of the year, Singer said.

Although the consortium contains a broad swath of companies including Toshiba Corp., Best Buy Co. Inc. and Netflix Inc., it does not include Apple Inc., or The Walt Disney Co.

Disney is attempting to come up with its own digital locker system called "KeyChest" that seeks to accomplish roughly the same thing. Apple representatives declined to comment.

Movie studios are pushing the benefits of being able to buy movies once for use on any device to offset the decline in DVD sales.

U.S. spending on all home video products, including discs, downloads and rentals, fell 5 percent to $20 billion in 2009, dragged down by a $2 billion decline in DVD spending to $16.4 billion, according to industry association The Digital Entertainment Group.

Spending on digital downloads, video-on-demand rentals and Blu-ray discs grew by about $1.1 billion combined to $3.6 billion, not enough to make up for the DVD decline.

One hurdle facing the digital locker concept is that the retailer collecting money on the sale may not be the one that bears the cost of delivering the movie over set-top boxes or the Internet.

So far, the necessary web of deals allowing for that complex transaction has not been set up.

Mark Coblitz, senior vice president at group member Comcast Corp., said his company has not decided how it might develop a business using digital tokens.

Comcast could sell UltraViolet-compatible movies through its Fancast video website, or deliver movies that customers have purchased elsewhere over Comcast set-top boxes. Either method could involve complex sharing of costs and revenues.

But no matter the business model, Coblitz said giving customers a way to access their movie libraries anywhere could make a Comcast cable subscription more worthwhile.

"It really adds a lot of value to being a customer of Comcast," he said.

___

Online:

Digital Entertainment Content Ecosystem: http://decellc.com

UltraViolet: http://www.uvvu.com

Follow Yahoo! News on , become a fan on

27 Comments

  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Hauntvictim Wed Jul 21, 2010 07:25 am PDT Report Abuse
    The details of all this have not been worked out because they will nickel and dime you to death to just watch that "glamorous" Ultraviolet file that you supposedly can unlock when ever you want!
    Apple was left out because the movie studios refuse to play nice with them!
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 2 users disliked this comment
    Stephen Wed Jul 21, 2010 03:02 am PDT Report Abuse
    Steganography is the way that video can be tagged with account IDs. If your account ID shows up on too many copied videos, expect problems.

    If distributors sell you a single viewing license each time to watch a video, you'd be better off buying the DVD if you want multiple viewings.

    I don't see a problem when someone enters into a clearly agreed upon contract for services or products. Implied consent for shrinkwrap contracts is complete @#$%.

    90% of videos aren't worth watching, which the reviews prove. The video and entertainment industry still exist because people get emotional responses and adrenalin rushes from situations that even very poorly imitate real life. It's addicting in the same way that an abuse victim goes back for more of the emotional roller coaster, even when it's violent and life threatening. In the case of videos (and entertainment in general) the irrational dysfunctional compulsion to watch results in obesity and laziness, more like neglect than abuse. Add commercials for food and drinks every 12 minutes and you get life damaging addiction, just as would happen with commercials for cigarettes and alcohol.

    Public healthcare should not be given to anyone that's a video addict -- since it's not recognized as an illness. Or at least couchpotatoes should not be allowed tax paid healthcare if they're not actively involved in both exercise and nutrition programs.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Wed Jul 21, 2010 02:40 am PDT Report Abuse
    from many years and the movies picture keep change and developed in the same time.and with new technology we step in new generation of watching movies. by next year we dont know what is coming?.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Michael Tue Jul 20, 2010 08:21 pm PDT Report Abuse
    I cant wait for this to be massively hacked and torn apart. What a joke this will be.
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Jim Jones Tue Jul 20, 2010 01:42 pm PDT Report Abuse
    that looks like its gonna be fun

    privacy-tools.be.tc
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 2 users disliked this comment
    Anthony Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:32 pm PDT Report Abuse
    "The UltraViolet brand is meant to evoke the platform's invisible presence, and transcendence across numerous devices.

    "It's outside the visible spectrum, but it's all around you and it's ubiquitous," Singer said."

    Ultraviolet light is also dangerous and causes cancer. I hope you put some disclaimers on your products!
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    SilverAcorn Tue Jul 20, 2010 12:28 pm PDT Report Abuse
    This is an interesting way to alter the existing paradigm. It might even be profitable, which, after all, is the purpose of being in business, yes?
    My only concern is how much "modification" will be implemented against the content? As it is now, even High Definition broadcasting runs a gauntlet of bitstream modifications from the originators through the networks, to the broadcasters and cable companies. Each one generally "doctors" or alters the media stream in some way to either "enhance", "control", or compress the digital bandwidth so they can pry more media content into the available channel (for higher profits, of course!).
    So, OK, if you want to watch "Star Wars" on your iPhone's 3-inch screen, all these mod's are generally invisible to the user.
    However, if you want to watch it on a 100-plus inch HD projection system in your $100K home theater rig, you don't want to see pixelation, color, and compression artifacts along with alterations in the multi-channel audio that you didn't pay for added to the content!
    Agreed, very few folks have $100K rigs, but a lot of folks have multi-thousand dollar widescreen TVs and home theater systems, and once things get up around 50-inches, many of the artifacts become glaringly visible (and often audible) and don't come close to representing the original media or the intentions of the media producers / directors.
    But its "mass media", and only if enough users complain about the wretched quality or manipulations of the content, will these companies start working to provide high quality media broadcasts.
    Remember, Blu-Ray and broadcast HD generally provides 1080 lines of video at best; a 35mm film has over 6000 line resolution based on the granularity of the film! We have a long way to go with truly representative media presentation for consumer-based formats. (But the media and broadcast moguls would like you to think otherwise.)
  • 0 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    Marc Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:48 am PDT Report Abuse
    Hey guys,
    I have four kids. And they aren't very gentle on my DVD's (and everything else). So I bought a Blu-ray DVD burner for my PC. And when I purchase a DVD or Blu-ray, I make a copy. I let the kids use the copies, and I put the originals away...until I need to make a new copy. I know this is technically breaking the law, but I do it for my own personal use. I don't sell pirated copies. And I only copy movies that I have purchased. And it appears to me, a lot of folks are doing this. Just like I used to copy my LP records to 8-track & casette so I could play them in my car. Just like Richard Nixon..."I am not a crook". And from what I've seen so far, the geeks in the world will always consider it a sporting challenge to crack the newest copy protection programs. It's like a game. This new technology would circumvent this whole process. I'm all for it.
  • 2 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 0 users disliked this comment
    spacedog Tue Jul 20, 2010 10:18 am PDT Report Abuse
    I can't believe they would exclude Apple! How dare they!

    ROTFLMFAO!!!!!!!
  • 4 users liked this comment Please sign in to rate this comment up. Please sign in to rate this comment down. 4 users disliked this comment
    Ajay Tue Jul 20, 2010 09:39 am PDT Report Abuse
    Only if you sheeple idiots read more books and sang songs with your families in the evening, Hollywood yanking your chain won't matter! This is the outcome of Americans becoming intellectually lazy.

Post a Comment

Sign in to post a comment, or Sign up for a free account.