Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Theaters group upset Sony to end free 3-D glasses

    LOS ANGELES (AP) โ€” Sony Corp.'s movie studio will save millions of dollars per movie after it told theater owners it will stop paying for 3-D glasses next May. But moviegoers could end up footing the bill.

    Sony Pictures suggested in letters sent the last few days to U.S. theater owners that they adopt a "guest ownership model" prevalent in Europe and Australia and charge patrons separately for the glasses, which they can re-use on future visits.

    RealD Inc., one of the main suppliers of glasses, said a pair in Europe sells for about a euro, or around $1.36 at today's exchange rate. Most patrons spend more than $3 on popcorn and sodas each, according to major theater chain Regal Entertainment Group, and the average ticket to a 3-D movie already costs a few dollars more than a ticket to a traditional showing.

    There also are designer 3-D glasses that run more than $100 a pair.

    The change Sony's planning would come just before Sony is to release its 3-D blockbusters for next summer, "The Amazing Spider-Man" and "Men in Black III," although some of Sony's 3-D movies, including "Arthur Christmas," come out earlier.

    Sony Pictures spokesman Steve Elzer said in a statement that "there are constructive ways to deal with the cost of 3-D glasses that will not adversely impact consumers and can also help the environment." He called on theater owners to come to the table to work out the issue.

    Usually, such negotiations happen behind closed doors. In this case, Sony going public with its new policy didn't sit well with theater owners. The nation's largest cinema trade group, the National Association of Theatre Owners, said the unilateral policy change was "insensitive" to consumers in a weak economy.

    Regal Entertainment Group on Wednesday threatened to cut the number of screens showing 3-D films if the move means it or its patrons will have to pay more.

    "To the extent that Sony seeks to change the current model in a manner that shifts costs to exhibitors, we would be forced to evaluate this new economic model and program our screens accordingly," said Regal CEO Amy Miles in a statement.

    Theater association president John Fithian said Sony's decision upends a six-year old practice of splitting the costs of the rollout of digital 3-D screens across the country.

    While movie studios have paid for 3-D glasses and the cost of digital projectors and equipment โ€” expecting to save on film printing costs in the future โ€” theaters have paid for 3-D add-on technology and labor costs.

    Sony's Elzer said there has never been an agreement that studios would always bear the cost of 3-D glasses.

    The squabble comes amid changes in the movie business that have hurt studios' profits. People are buying fewer DVDs and aren't paying enough for Blu-ray discs, on-demand movie downloads, or online subscriptions to make up for the decline. Studios are trying to cut costs by laying off workers and cutting movie budgets.

    Fithian said the belt-tightening shouldn't result in passing the buck to theater owners or moviegoers. "It is nonsensical to say theater owners and our patrons should be paying for their mistakes in the home market," he said.

    It remains to be seen if other studios will follow Sony's lead and stop paying for the glasses. Time Warner Inc.'s Warner Bros. said it was sticking with its arrangements with theaters for now.

    "We are evaluating the situation," said Chris Aronson, senior vice president of domestic distribution for News Corp.'s 20th Century Fox.

    Representatives from Viacom Inc.'s Paramount, Comcast Corp.'s Universal and The Walt Disney Co. did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

    One immediate result of the announced change was that RealD shares plunged $1.80, or 14.7 percent, to close at $10.42 in trading Wednesday. RealD supplies technology for about 90 percent of the 3-D screens in the U.S. and is a major supplier of the glasses, which made up about 40 percent of its revenue in the most recent quarter.

    RealD spokesman Rick Heineman said the company is fine with any new model, including one in which consumers pay. He compared that system to buying headphones on an airplane. The core profit of the company comes through licensing its technology, he said.

    Sony shares rose 12 cents to close at $19.34.

     

    86 comments

    • Preston  •  8 mths ago
      If the glasses were being supplied by Sony for free why do I have to pay an extra $5.00 fee to rent them when I watch a 3D movie at the theater? I return the glasses but they do not return my $5.00. Can you say rip off.
    • joe  •  8 mths ago
      well, that's the end of 3d
      • yahooblows 8 mths ago
        It's about time this ridiculous gimmick died, yet again.
    • commentator  •  8 mths ago
      The theater operators are upset? They already make you take out a loan for a ticket, then jack that up for anything 3D. Drink and popcorn of the smallest sizes run you at least $10 per head. Then you have to sit through a minimum of 15-minutes of COMMERCIALS before the previews start. Going to the movies is a royal screw job these days. I only go to 3-4 a year anymore ... and never buy their drinks or popcorn. What I save by not going more than makes up the cost of the highest cost Netflix subscription ... and I can sit comfortably at home with my beverage and snack of choice!
      Boo, hoo, hoo. Pity party for poor, poor theater owners. F you!
      • yahooblows 8 mths ago
        They make almost nothing on the ticket, blame that on the studios. The rest is where they make their money, that's why it's all so expensive. A better solution to this whole problem is to go back focusing on things like a plot instead of gimmicks.
      • dennish 8 mths ago
        Drinks and popcorn are too costly. For the same price, our family will go out to dinner before the movie. Start to see more restaurants popping up around theaters as this catches on.
    • useblain  •  8 mths ago
      Hey, Sony. Go right ahead. I hate 3-D movies anyway, not to mention those stupid, dirty, annoying glasses.
    • BWT  •  8 mths ago
      Apparently companies learn NOTHING from history. You don't suddenly, in the midst of a recession, with so many unemployed, start charging MORE and expect attendance to INCREASE. What part of economics 101 are they missing? Not only that, but most people these days do not WANT 3D! The attendance at 3D showings has been declining, so this price increase will just force those who do pay extra for 3D, to return to non-3D showings.
      Talk about jumping the shark! Netflix started the virus on stupidity this summer, looks like Sony has caught their bug.
    • El Ridiculoso  •  8 mths ago
      "3D" movies are a gimmick that's overused and getting kind of boring anyways... the glasses are uncomfortable and movies are plenty expensive enough already. Frankly I doubt I'd miss it if it went away.

      The last time I thought polarized "3D" effects added anything worthwhile to a movie experience was 25 years ago sitting at Disneyland watching "Captain EO."
      • Preston 8 mths ago
        When the first 3D movies were made in the late 40s or early 50s I went to see them. There were only 3 made at that time. One was House of Wax. One used the grey polorized glasses and the other two used the red and blue celophine paper glasses. The later were better and actually made the movie appear to have demension. Todays 3D movies suck and do not have any more demension than the 2D movies. It is just a rip off.
      • Preston 8 mths ago
        Oh I am 70 years old and saw all three movies the Ashland theater located at 24th and Elmwood in Kansas City, Missouri.
    • Llarry Llamma  •  8 mths ago
      Who cares? Given a choice, I would much rather watch a 2D movie anyway. After an hour, my eyes start to hurt because the 3D glasses are like sun glasses in that they make everything darker. Cinemas don't seem to understand that they need to compensate by increasing the projector brightness!
      • FUZZY WUZZY 8 mths ago
        they KNOW they have to do it.. but that shortens the life span of the more expensive bulbs used for 3D projection.. so they refuse to do it.. worse still.. they use the very same machines at the reduced brightness for 2D movies and it makes those virtually unwatchable in night scenes of any kind..
    • razzledazzle  •  8 mths ago
      Um, no, I won't be paying for 3-D glasses.
    • John  •  8 mths ago
      We already pay for 3D glasses. That's what the extra $4.00 charge is for when we pay to see these overrated movies.
    • Raccoon City Survivor  •  8 mths ago
      you'd have to be an idiot to pay $16 bucks for a movie.
      • C R 8 mths ago
        Yup, now add a couple kids & a spouse, we're talking like $80 for a movie and snacks. :(
    • a guy  •  8 mths ago
      Maybe if they made better movies, they wouldn't have to be in 3D to make it more interesting.
    • Wild Dog  •  8 mths ago
      In the last paragraph: "He compared that system to buying headphones on an airplane. "

      Two totally different things. You don't buy a plane ticket so you can listen to the crappy in-flight music (or movies that some flights show.) Having to buy your own 3-D glasses is more like going to a restaurant and being expected to bring your own place setting or buy one from the restaurant.

      Another random though--after everyone is forced to buy their own glasses, the manufacturers will probably change the technology to "make it better" just so everyone will have to buy new glasses again.
    • Ryuk  •  8 mths ago
      Frankly I thought you were already paying for them because admission is higher than a standard 2D movie.
    • Tom  •  8 mths ago
      Blu Ray rental....$3.77....I get hot fresh sanitary popcorn for 60 cents a bag...big glass of soda....25 cents....can sit in a clean area in a comfortable chair....have as many people over as I can hold for no extra charge....and I can tell anybody I want to shut the *&$* up or get out...:)
    • Brent  •  8 mths ago
      Wait... these glasses cost $1.36 and Sony has been paying for them? I must ask then why every theater I've been to charges me $5 for these and asks for them back after the movie is over. Not to mention the extra charge for the movie being a 3-D version.
    • WAKE UP AMERICA  •  8 mths ago
      Simple solution, don't play the stupid movie!!!! then sony loses.
    • Stephen  •  8 mths ago
      The Mrs and I like going to the movies, but both wear glasses. When you put 3-D glasses on top of regulars, the experence is less than fun (I find them uncomfortable and they make her wozzy.). So were were going to see the 2-D versions, until our local thearter started only carrying the 3-D (Presumably as they saw they were losing money, or the distributors stopped releasing the 2-Ds at the same time as the 3-Ds). Now we do the second run place at half the price... Shot themselves in the foot...

      Couple that with what seems to be a recent dearth of "good" movies*, and many of the comments about the end of the movie age may be right on target.

      *entirely subjective, I know, but when you look at what is out and not one thing on the list appeals something must be wrong.... 5 years ago at least for us it was "Which 1 of the 3 we want to see do you want to see tonight?"
    • Laura J  •  8 mths ago
      At our local movie theater, 3D tickets are already $2 or more than regular movie tickets. I discovered this when we thought we'd go see a matinee and the cashier said "That will be $22.50" ... I was expecting $15 ($5 per ticket for the matinee). And they won't let you reuse the glasses if you save them from a previous showing -- you still have to pay the $2+ upcharge for the 3D experience. Needless to say, we've not gone to see very many 3D movies.
    • NightShayde  •  8 mths ago
      If they'd stop charging so much for movie tickets and concessions, they'd probably get more people coming to the theater. Why do the studios act surprised when people choose to pay $19.95 for a DVD months down the line instead of paying $15 or more per movie ticket? I'm not going to pay $60 for a family of four to see a movie unless I'm darn sure it's a fabulous must-see film. Even going to a movie with just my husband is no longer an inexpensive evening of entertainment. Besides which, if given the choice between 3D and 2D, we'll take the 2D every time. 3D glasses are uncomfortable for kids to wear, and really suck if you are already wearing glasses.
    • PartOfThe99  •  8 mths ago
      A hundred years ago, there was a pro baseball team in just about every small town in America. That was because working class joes could afford the gate and the cost of concessions. That's one reason the game became America's pastime.

      Now, even cities of 50,000 often cannot successfully field a team, because gate prices are so outrageous only a certain segment of the market can actually afford to go.

      Sony and the rest of the movie industry are making the same mistake. At a time when real wages continue to drop and families are making the choice between eating and paying the rent, the last thing they want to do is get hit with add ons when they splurge and go to the theater. 3D movies ALREADY cost more; the one thing the studios and theaters should not do is consider sticking moviegoers with the price.

      Give away the cheap specs and sell the "designer" specs in the theater lobby. I am sure there are enough movie buffs that would buy the designer brand for show (as well as home use) that it would more than offset the cost of providing the freebies. Otherwise, you're going to find moviegoers, like sports fans, drifting away from that form of entertainment except in larger cities, where there are enough of the wealthier classes to sustain the industry.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...