Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Thursday's 'make-or-break' South Carolina debate: 4 key questions

    Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, Rick Santorum, and Ron Paul will take the stage in Charleston to make one last pitch before Saturday's critical primary

    The Republican presidential candidates will clash Thursday night in their final "make-or-break" debate before Saturday's crucial South Carolina primary. Tension is rising in the race — Rick Perry ended his campaign hours before the debate and endorsed fellow conservative Newt Gingrich, who has said he must win South Carolina if he's to overtake frontrunner Mitt Romney. How might the debate tip Saturday's results? Here, four key factors to watch:

    1. Can Romney stop Gingrich's momentum?
    Newt Gingrich has chipped away at — and in some cases, erased — Mitt Romney's lead in South Carolina polls. To counter the surge, Romney's surrogates have suggested that Gingrich is an unreliable conservative who has been using "the language of the left" to attack Mitt. The debate in Charleston will be Romney's last big chance before Saturday's primary, says Matt Viser at The Boston Globe, to take Gingrich "down a few notches in an attempt to quickly sew up the GOP nomination." But Mitt should be wary of focusing his fire too directly on Newt, says Jonathan S. Tobin at Commentary. If Romney acts like "he no longer believes he has the nomination in the bag," voters might start to agree with him. As tempting as it may be, "a change of style would be disastrous" for Mitt.

    SEE MORE: Stephen Colbert's 'not-so-funny' presidential announcement

     

    2. Will Gingrich knock it out of the park again?
    "Gingrich's closing pitch is founded on his debate performances," says John Dickerson at Slate. His widely praised showing on Monday, in the first of the state's two debates, sent him climbing in the polls. Indeed, when Newt said poor people need jobs, not handouts, says Tom Dotan at Neon Tommy, "the debate audience, which was hyped up like the old Arsenio Hall show, gave a raucous standing ovation. And the sounds of hands clapping revived Gingrich like Tinker Bell." Can he do it again Thursday?

    3. Or will Newt's ex-wife bring him down?
    After the CNN debate ends, ABC will air what's being billed as a "bombshell" interview with Newt's second ex-wife, Marianne — an interview it's been promoting all day. (The former Mrs. Gingrich says, among other things, that Newt wanted an "open marriage.") "No one should be surprised," says Tobin, "if Santorum, who had hoped to ride evangelical support to victory in South Carolina, doesn't stay away from Gingrich’s personal problems." In many ways, the voters "who would be most moved by [Marianne Gingrich's] views on her cheating ex-husband are already opposed to" Newt, says Jennifer Rubin at The Washington Post. But you never know. If this becomes an issue at the debate, "Gingrich risks losing wavering evangelicals and those voters who are preoccupied with electability."

    SEE MORE: The latest tweets about the New Hampshire primary

     

    4. Will all the candidates get a fair shake?
    The worst performers in recent debates have been the moderators, says Rubin. ABC's George Stephanopoulos got smacked for his "contraception, evolution, and other make-them-look-like-yokels questions." Fox News, according to The New York Times, staged a "get Romney" debate, taking it upon itself to give conservatives a shot at taking down their moderate nemesis. The last time Thursday's host, CNN's John King, moderated a debate, he interrupted and cut off candidates, wasting "precious time" that could have been devoted to substance. Let's hope he can muster "a semblance of fairness" in Charleston, so the candidates can make their closing arguments in the "most decisive" debate before a potentially decisive primary.

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    24 comments

    • AnchorG  •  Wilmington, North Carolina  •  4 mths ago
      Americans are intrigued by war, usually people who have never served and folks whose children are past the age of serving. Iraq did not attack us. The problem is we want to rule
      the world and stick our noses into other folk affairs. We want oil and we have oil here but we have not built a refinery since the early eighties. We are too worried about tourist coming to the beach. When gas hits five dollars the tourist will stop coming. We want other countries to take the risk, but when that happens they control your economy. To make matters worse we have sent our manufacturing jobs to countries abroad. Those cheap imports are increasing in price and unemployment is at an all time high. Both Dem. and Rep. got too involved in nation building that has created a shift in demand for resources like oil.
      The same folks who are saying we need to bring back manufacturing are the same folks who supported NAFTA and wanted to retrain workers to become a marketing and service country. Makes me sick to hear them talking about bringing back manufacturing. Not one person in the debate mentioned textiles and furniture. Did they not realized that over 600 textile plants closed in four states because they had zero interest in bailing out textiles and furniture. I wished I could have asked them a few questions. No one mentioned the five billion dollars we are going to give Egypt thanks to John McCain and John Kerry. I would like to ask them when are we going to stop sending money overseas? When is the Federal Gov. going to pay back the money they borrowed out of social security? Ron Paul is right there is a difference in a military budget and a defense budget. For example, why does millionaire Rick Hendrix get millions of dollars from The National Guard to put a sticker on Dale Jr.'s car. I am a race fan but that is our tax dollars. Nobody joins the Army, National Guard or any other branch of service because they sponsor a ball game or race. I joined because of a smooth talking recruiter who came out to the school. We throw away enough money that every U.S. citizen could get assistance with their health care premiums if needed. Another Item I heard talked about on the debate was should a millionaire draw their social security and the answer is yes they should the gov. took money from them and they should pay up. I would draw mine if I were a billionaire. The real question is should they continue their lavish retirements for serving two terms. Should Presidents be paid for life? I agree with Rick Perry they should all be part time jobs except for the President and his staff. Some rich people have told the Gov if they could stop paying in they would sign a waiver to never draw a dime and the Gov. will not do that. Dem. and Rep. both have never experienced the hardships regular people endure so they are clueless. I guess we have to pick the lesser of evils hoping we are right and vote the clown that currently calls himself president out.
    • Freedom  •  4 mths ago
      What I thought was funny was how Jon Huntsman is endorsing Mitt Romney after calling him "unelectable". And Rick Perry is endorsing Newt after slamming his multiple marriages.
      • Inlander 4 mths ago
        That's politics. Live next to someone you don't particularly care for? Work beside someone you can't find in your heart or mind to always adore? How about having to listen to people around you talk about topics even if you don't agree with them? Am sure you've experienced all of the aforementioned. Politicians deal with it in hopefully positive ways; just as you, hopefully, do the same.
      • Jim M 4 mths ago
        The candidate getting the endorsement agrees to pay off all or part of the endorser's campaign expenses. That's how it works.
    • Dicky  •  Newark, New Jersey  •  4 mths ago
      I wish someone would jump the script and bring up Newt's past dirty corproate sponsored Free Trade deals that outsourced our manufacturing & economy to Clinton White House owners communist China. South Carolina does not need to be reminded what those Newt dirty deals did to their textile manufacturing jobs.
      • homeinLA 4 mths ago
        I hope they don't, hope they'll remember and not fall for "silver tongued devil".
    • Louis  •  Lubbock, Texas  •  4 mths ago
      I predict another pageant like amopshere. No real tough questions on the economy and truth telling.
    • Dmnted  •  4 mths ago
      How about ask some real questions in ths debate. About our economy, what their plans are to deal with it, about our debt. Bringing companies back to the states so we can get Americans back to work. Not just one of them, ask them all. Tired of the "How do you feel about gays getting married?" ...really not as big a concern for most Americans. (No offence intended towards anyone)
    • A Yahoo! User  •  4 mths ago
      And now the polls show that Nasty Newt is in the lead in SC. I don't want this trash as the nominee, I will not vote if Newt gets the nomination.
      • sam's son 4 mths ago
        good, we won't need your vote !
      • spambrando 4 mths ago
        If you do not like the candidates running, you do have a write-in choice.
    • Hop  •  Stanton, California  •  4 mths ago
      2 Catholics vs 1 Mormon vs. My Hero.
      • no 4 mths ago
        doesn't take a lot to impress you does it?
      • A1 4 mths ago
        No,

        I have a feeling that all it takes to impress you is someone who will treat the govt. checkbook in a way that they wouldn't dare treat their own!
      • spambrando 4 mths ago
        Seriously. NO? His hero is MY hero. BTW, he's a Baptist. I am not; I'm an atheist.
    • Loving  •  4 mths ago
      *****************
      RON PAUL
      2012
      REST IN PEACE
      *****************
      • Clifford 4 mths ago
        In Ron Paul's DECADES in the House, he's had ONE PIECE of legislation passed. Not exactly Ron Paul the Statesman, Consensus Builder, Communicator, Conqueror or Giant Killer.

        The 2012 National DEFENSE Budget of $682B was passed with overwhelming
        bi-partisan Congressional support. Was that twice Ron Paul's recommended amount ($341B)? 80% ($546B)?? 60% ($409B)?? Must we wait until he is elected before we get a number??
        No details on amounts. We all know that there are no more blank checks, but Ron Paul just comes across as goofy and ignorant, recklessly and irresponsibly shooting his mouth off.

        Perhaps if he does run as a 3rd party (and I think he will) he will siphon off more Democrat votes than Republican? God I hope so.

        The news media needs to ask Ron Paul what his National DEFENSE Budget amount would have been. Anyone? Anyone at all?

        "Texas Rep. Ron Paul was returning to campaigning for the first time since Wednesday. He has spent several days at home in Texas after his second-place finish in the New Hampshire primary last week."
        - AP 1/15/2011

        Yes, Presidential Campaigning can be VERY, VERY exhausting. RON PAUL 2012??? At 77???
        Folks, let's face it, there is a very good chance you wouldn't be electing Ron Paul for President, you'd be electing his Vice-President.

        In the interest of full disclosure, maybe he should reveal to us who that Vice-President would be BEFORE he goes any further?? And you thought John McCain looked old next to Barack Obama?
      • A1 4 mths ago
        Cliff,

        isn't it just dandy that all the legislation that DID PASS managed to run up our debt. So *applause* for your "successful" legislators. I'm sure you want to elect MORE of them.!

        "brilliant!"
      • A1 4 mths ago
        Cliff,

        If you want to see his numbers, (I've posted them before to you, you've just been to lazy and bigotted to look)

        Go to Paul's website and/or search the web for "Ron Pau'ls Plan to Restore America" It really isn't THAT difficult to find.

        You DO know how to use a search engine, don't you?
    • Peter  •  Indiantown, Florida  •  4 mths ago
      The Tea Party cracks me up. Nothing but middle aged poor white people who think the Republicants will make them rich. Now how stupid is THAT?
    • Santiago  •  Deerfield, Massachusetts  •  4 mths ago
      Now that the inbred Texan droped out,whats left Newt,Mitt,and a catholic taliban Santorum Ron Paul is the best remaining hope for a Rep.victory in 2012,speaking as a Democrat you have my deepest sympathy,maybe2016 you are truely a sad bunch
    • spambrando  •  Danbury, Connecticut  •  4 mths ago
      Link to every GOP candidate except Ron Paul. Another Faux media outlet refusing to provide any coverage of him. Corporate leeches... Ron Paul 2012. I may not like everything he stands for but at least he stands for the important things in a manner that outclasses the remainder of the Rethuglican wanna-be's.
    • Spot  •  4 mths ago
      Key Question # 5. Is there an honest man among them?
    • Obie  •  4 mths ago
      What...another effin' debate?
      When these clowns are finally done, the only ones
      left standing will be the master debaters.
    • Joe  •  McHenry, Illinois  •  4 mths ago
      Why not ask them if any of them knows how to COMPROMISE with the democrates or if they are going to take the hard line the teapartyis taking and screww the middle class?
    • JOEL  •  4 mths ago
      Oh s88t not again....
    • Bo  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  4 mths ago
      When Japan invaded China, Hitler invaded Poland and France and then the Middle East and Africa, Russia invaded all of Eastern Europe and parts of Asia, who did the world turn to? Mexico? Canada? Greece? Australia? etc?
      No. The world always turns to the U.S.A.
      Why? Because the world knows that we are compassionate, freedom-loving, justice seeking, and loving people.
      We are the shining beacon of democracy that brings stability throughout the world. We work harder and dream bigger than any other people on this planet.
      The American people do not seek to enslave others, but to liberate them instead.
      Do we have leaders that have compromised our values for the sake of money and power? Yes. For at least the last 60 years or so, we have had an onslaught of morally corrupt politicians, business leaders, religious leaders, and others that have abused their power not only here, but abroad as well.
      Do not lay blame upon the American people, as we are as frustrated as you about the way our leaders have taken our freedoms and trust given to us in the Constitution, and trampled upon them. Sometimes by accident, and sometimes by direct intent. Sometimes with good intent, but with little understanding of the consequences of their decisions.
      We the People, as a whole, do not like being told what to do, how to do it, when or where to do it. We're tired of it too.
      Too many laws. Too little privacy. Too much regulation. Too much disparity. Too little understanding of the intent of our Constitution. Too much complacency. Too much forced charity by our government for foreign nations.
      We are broke. The American taxpayer can no longer afford to help you. We need to fix our broken systems here at home.
      I don't agree with everything that Ron Paul advocates, but that is why we have a Congress and Judicial branch of government to temper more radical ideas and concepts. Our Founding Fathers were a group of geniuses that devised a system of government that was self-correcting, as long as the American public did not become too complacent. Which is what we have done.
      We must stop this insanity and take it back. Not only for ourselves, but for the rest of the world.
      Vote to restore your freedom, before we no longer have any choice. Vote Ron Paul.
    • Clifford  •  4 mths ago
      Newt is winning again. 17 for 17.
      Rick Santorum looks like he's about to cry.
      Mitt Romney is clueless and is going goofy.
      Ron Paul is still goofy and clueless.
    • Chaucer  •  4 mths ago
      I thought the four key questions would be:
      1) What would you do about the gay marriage question?;
      2) Will you protect and preserve Roe v. Wade?;
      3) Will you commit to expanding and increasing welfare and food stamps?; and
      4) Will you commit to repealing the Bush era tax cuts on those people earning more than they should be earning?
    • BF  •  Richmond, Virginia  •  4 mths ago
      These are possibly the 5 best sentences you'll ever read:
      1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
      2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
      3. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else.
      4. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it.
      5. When half the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them and then the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my friend is the beginning of the end for any society.

      In 10 months, “We the People” have an opportunity to demonstrate our power. Time has come to send this narcissistic neophyte home and cleanse America of the socialistic malaise he and his gangster buddies created.
    • Caren  •  4 mths ago
      this is a republican debate...only important questions are asked, gay marriage, states rights, reducing taxes on the rich, taking away medicare and SS and let the poor split up the janatorial jobs...voila.....the America they want