Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Top Sen. Republican: deal very close on default

    WASHINGTON (AP) — The top Republican in the Senate said Congress and the White House were very close to a deal on raising the limit on U.S. borrowing that would avert an unprecedented default on America's debt, ending one of the nastiest partisan fights in recent memory.

    Senate Majority Leader Mitchell McConnell said he was nearing a recommendation of the tentative agreement to Republicans in the upper chamber. It would, he said, likely extend U.S. borrowing authority, which expires on Tuesday, beyond the 2012 presidential and congressional elections, a fundamental demand of President Barack Obama.

    At the same time, the agreement would include none of the tax increases Obama has sought and Republicans had steadfastly rejected. It also includes, he said, the requirement that both houses of Congress vote on a constitutional amendment to balance the budget. That outcome of that vote, however, would have no effect on raising the debt limit.

    Senior White House adviser David Plouffe said that both sides are generally in agreement on an emerging package that would cut the deficit in two stages, with key details still being worked out.

    Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer said there still was no deal and talks on many issues still needed to be settled. Although he said there was "relief" in Congress and the White House because serious negotiations were now making headway.

    The deal, negotiated late Saturday night, would raise the nation's debt limit would rise in two steps by about $2.4 trillion and spending would be cut by a slightly larger amount, according to officials close to the talks. The first stage — about $1 trillion — would take place immediately and the second later in the year.

    The officials who described the talks did so on condition of anonymity, citing their sensitive nature.

    Obama is seeking legislation to raise the government's $14.3 trillion debt limit by enough to tide the Treasury over until after the 2012 elections. He has threatened to veto any legislation that would allow a recurrence of the current crisis next year but has agreed to Republican demands that deficits be cut — without tax increases — in exchange for additional U.S. borrowing authority.

    Without a compromise in place by Tuesday, administration officials say the Treasury will run out of funds to pay all the nation's bills. The subsequent default could prove catastrophic for the U.S. economy by causing interest rates to rise and financial markets to sink, sending shockwaves around the world, they say. With financial markets closed for the weekend, lawmakers had a little breathing room, but not much. Asian markets begin opening for the new work week when it is late Sunday afternoon in the U.S. capital.

    "There is very little time" Obama said Saturday in his weekly radio and Internet address. He called for an end to political gamesmanship, saying "the time for compromise on behalf of the American people is now."

    One official commenting on the late night negotiations said the two sides had settled on general concepts, but added there were numerous details to be worked out — and no assurance of a final agreement.

    Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid postponed until Sunday a test vote on a his own debt limit proposal that had been scheduled for shortly after midnight to give negotiators time to work out an agreement.

    "There are many elements to be finalized," he cautioned. "There is still a distance to go."

    With a deal in the works, McConnell said at a joint news conference with House Speaker John Boehner on Saturday that he was confident a deal could be reached "in the very near future and resolve this crisis in the best interests of the American people."

    Reid, after a meeting at the White House with Obama and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, had initially disagreed with that optimistic assessment.

    Obama needs Congress to approve an increase in the government's borrowing authority, in the past increases have been routine, but Republicans, citing the giant U.S. deficit, have demanded huge spending cuts as a condition for approving the increase.

    ___

    McConnell and Schumer spoke on CNN, Ploufe appeared on NBC.

     

    292 comments

    • Truthsociety  •  6 mths ago
      The cuts proposed by both parties are nonsense. They are only base line cuts on the projected increases over 10 years with no statutory requirements for future overlapping budgets. Both sides are playing games with the 41% borrowing of every $1. needed to run a out of control spending government. We are going to be right back in the same position only worse within 6-12 months. Plus the fact that the rate of growth estimated at 4% is under performing by 300% and getting worse. So all of the Congressional Budget Office's numbers are grossly optimistic including the Labor unemployment statistics. 1
    • ken  •  6 mths ago
      On March 20, 2006 the National Debt stood at $8.3 TRILLION BUCKS.

      Quote:

      “The fact that we are here today to debate raising America’s debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government can’t pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government’s reckless fiscal policies…

      Increasing America’s debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that “the buck stops here.” Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”

      - Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL), March 20, 2006

      Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) and ALL Democrats voted AGAINST increasing the National Debt.
    • Richard  •  6 mths ago
      Let's be clear. The only binding part of this legislation is the increase in debt. All other portions of this piece of toilet paper are future promises that depend on future congresses to make into law. No future congress will enact this any quicker than this congress has enacted cuts. Repub or Dem, you have no leadership in Washington. These are career guys looking out for themselves at this countries peril. McConnel should be kicked out yesterday. There is no leader on the hill that can make a hard decision! This illustrates why we need a balanced budget amendment, because the yahoos won't EVER do it. Rip the money from them and you remove their power to control our lives. This deal must fail!
    • John  •  6 mths ago
      It is Washington vs the people. We just sit and watch them debate how to take money from us and take false sides on how to hurt ourselves. Throw all the bums out.
    • KALEU  •  6 mths ago
      DISGUSTING. The people need TERM LIMITS
    • TexJal  •  6 mths ago
      NO! NO! NO! McConnell -- this is a bad deal all the way around! Once again we are being sold out by RINO's who have no courage to do what's right -- stop this liberalism dead in it's tracks - NOW! Another sellout of the American people by their elected representatives!
    • AgeofDissent  •  6 mths ago
      "extend U.S. borrowing" until after the 2012 elections "a demand of President Barack Obama."
      >
      Why is it imperative that these negotiations go beyond obama's one term?
      >
      NOBAMA2012
    • Ricardo  •  6 mths ago
      DO NOT TRUST THE DEMOCRATS! they have lied on several occasions in the past regarding cutting spending. We must do away with base line budgeting.
    • Cory  •  6 mths ago
      Does anyone feel like they are watching the twilight zone? Maybe living in the twilight zone?
    • snapper  •  6 mths ago
      Is it possible that the Congressional democrats are the real stumbling blocks?
    • TheTruth  •  6 mths ago
      AP: All Propeganda, more fear mongering about hell breaking loose if something isn't done by Tuesday.
    • James A  •  6 mths ago
      Who outside the Belt Way wants to appease the President? Just more kick the can politics to save Obama the embarrassment of having to assume leadership on any issue other than golf and vacations and Michelle's Flying Circus and protecting her 21 hand maids in waiting.
    • Ed Myers  •  6 mths ago
      OBAMA: "WE NEED COMPROMISE IN WASHINGTON"
      ****************************************************************
      Boehner: Ok Mr. Prez, will will raise the limit but no tax increases
      Obama: No

      Boehner: Ok Mr. Prez, we will raise the debt but only if we cut, cap and balance
      Obama: No

      Boehner: Ok Mr. Prez, we will raise the limit but only if a BBA and only till Sept 2012
      Obama: No

      McConnell: Ok Mr. Prez, we will raise the limit, extend it beyond the election, not have a BBA provision
      Obama: See, when you do it my way, we can compromise
    • Craig  •  6 mths ago
      A fictional deadline used to create a sense of "emergency" so that the legislation has to be rushed....nobody has time to read it. It passes so we can find out what's in it. Just like TARP and Obamacare. RINOS accomplish their goal of torpedoing the Tea Party members. Obama gets more borrowing authority and the US goes down the toilet to bankruptcy.
    • Bread and Circuses  •  6 mths ago
      Well well...guess our vote doesn't count any longer. We sent legislators to DC to write laws and debate them in the well of Congress. Here we have a bill negotiated by a wannabe dictator and his court jester meeting behind doors with 4 big government establishment "leaders". We are already living under a tyranny...we just don't realize it yet. I will pray for my country.
    • Used Karma Salesman  •  6 mths ago
      The entire thing is a dog-and-pony show. The deal has probably been done for weeks but this way it builds up the drama and gets the voters riled up. The next step will be to wait until the last minute and announce: “We did it! We’ve reached an agreement by working together! We did it for the American people!” The devout Democrats will declare their party the winner; the devout Republicans will do the same for their side. The voters continue to get played and they enjoy it. Carry on.
    • Tyler Dohar  •  6 mths ago
      Hey Harry,
      Your "plan" isn't going to go anywhere. Pass the plan thats already made it through the house. Solve this now and stop trying to play political games. God, I wish you had lost in your re-election bid last November.
    • Doug  •  6 mths ago
      "The fact that we're here today to debate raising America's debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. Leadership means 'The buck stops here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better. I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America's debt limit."

      - Barack H. Obama (when Bush was president)
    • Eric Mitchell  •  6 mths ago
      Will anyone in the media ask why the Democrats are so afraid of a Balanced Budget Amendment? The answer is that the only way they can get votes and stay in power is by giving away "freebies"...getting people hooked on the government t!t and then scaring them by claiming the other side wants to "take it away." It boggles the mind on how anyone would vote for someone who didn't support a BBA. It's common sense...and don't let the "national emergency" scenerio fly as a reason to oppose it...the amendment could require a super-majority in Congress to vote for it...so if there was ever a REAL national emergency, it could be temporarily suspended.
    • AgeofDissent  •  6 mths ago
      I wonder - will ANYONE read the final bill? Remember the Obamacare vote? Pelosi's infamous quote: "We have to pass it to see what's in it. I hope our elected officials ON BOTH SIDES get this right...
    [ [ [['Dekraai', 10]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/mourners-remember-seal-beach-shooting-victims-1318620627-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/3/2c/32c8e92d889f42edb719cb5257afdf4e.jpeg', '461', ' ', 'Reuters/Lori Shepler', ], [ [['iPhone 4SXXXXXXX', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/thousands-line-up-for-apple-s-iphone-4s-1318602841-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/f/4f/f4f15e8f6f323f5386dc9fdf9e15dca8.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP/Kirsty Wigglesworth', ] ]
    [ [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], '27013743', '0' ], [ [['keyword', 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...
    • HP logo is seen outside Hewlett-Packard Belgian headquarters in Diegem
      HP shares fall on sharp profit decline

      (Reuters) - Shares of Hewlett-Packard Co were down 2 percent in premarket trading on Thursday after the world's No. 1 computer maker posted a sharp decline in quarterly earnings and warned it would take … More »HP shares fall on sharp profit decline

      HP logo is seen outside Hewlett-Packard Belgian headquarters in Diegem

      (Reuters) - Shares of Hewlett-Packard Co were down 2 percent in premarket trading on Thursday after the world's No. 1 computer maker posted a sharp decline in quarterly earnings and warned it would take several years to turn around its sprawling businesses. The storied Silicon Valley company, which has been trying to move …

     
    Brought to you byYahoo! Finance
    Loading...