Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    “What’s the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court?” + 6 other questions about federal courts

    federal courts

    The organization of federal courts at a glance. Image via U.S. Courts/uscourts.gov.

    Last week the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals made headlines with its ruling that striking down Prop 8, the voter-approved measure banning same-sex marriage in California. A lot of people are wondering about the future of same-sex marriage in California and the nation. But some people might also be wondering… what exactly is the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals?

    The short answer is that it is a federal court that covers various cases in California and 10 other western states and territories. And the long answer… well, read on.

    Wait, isn’t the Supreme Court the only federal court?

    No. In addition to the Supreme Court–the highest court in the land–we have more than 100 federal courts.

    How did we get all these federal courts?

    It all started with the Constitution. Article III–the section setting up the judicial branch of government and the shortest article in the Constitution–states that “the judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” In addition, Article I, the section setting up the legislative branch, states that the Congress may “constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court.” A few years later, Judiciary Act of 1789 divided the country into regions for the organization of the lower federal courts.

    How are the federal courts organized?

    The United States and its territories are divided into 94 judicial districts, each of which has a trial court as well as a bankruptcy court. Each state has at least one judicial district. There are also two special trial courts with nationwide jurisdiction: the U.S. Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

    Those 94 judicial districts are then organized into 12 regional circuits, each of which has an appellate court, or court of appeals. These appellate courts hear appeals from the trial courts located within the circuit’s region. There is also one federal circuit court to hear special cases, such as those decided by the previously mentioned special trial courts.

    There are also a handful of other federal courts independent of the judicial branch, including military courts, the Court of Veterans Appeals, and the U.S. Tax Court.

    And of course, at the very top is the Supreme Court, the highest court in the land.

    How are the federal courts different from the state courts?

    State courts generally handle most criminal cases and civil cases involving divorce and child custody, probate and inheritance, real estate, contract disputes, traffic violations and personal injury.

    Federal courts generally handle cases involving the constitutionality of a law, federal laws and treaties, ambassadors or public ministers, disputes between two or more states, admiralty law and bankruptcy.

    How does a case get to a federal court?

    First, there has to be an actual case, or controversy–the court only deals with real, not hypothetical, questions. Second, the plaintiff must demonstrate that they have legal “standing,” that they have been legally harmed somehow by the defendant. Third, the complaint must be one the Court has the authority to remedy. Finally, the case must fall within the federal (as opposed to the state) court’s jurisdiction.

    How did Prop 8 make its way to a federal court? Will Prop 8 go on to the Supreme Court?

    The Christian Science Monitor summed it up nicely:

    California has a long and complicated history regarding the issue of gay marriage. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, the California Supreme Court in May 2008 ruled that same-sex couples have the right to marry in California. Proposition 8, which amended the state’s constitution to define marriage as between one man and one woman, was passed in November 2008. About two years later, a federal district judge ruled that Proposition 8 violated the equal protection provisions of the US Constitution. The decision was appealed, and the Ninth US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled on February 7, 2012 that the ban violated the Constitution.

    What’s next for Prop 8? The measure’s proponents have promised to appeal last week’s ruling, but they have a few options: they could appeal again to the Ninth Circuit Court, asking it to review the case “en banc”–with a full bench of 11 judges rather than the three-judge panel that gave the ruling last week. They could also appeal to the Supreme Court. So Prop 8 might go to the Supreme Court–or it might not.

    Many disagree about the issue of same-sex marriage. But it’s easy to agree that the Prop 8 case and the recent ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court provide an excellent reason to learn more about how our federal courts work.

    Further Reading…

    “Understanding the Federal Courts,” United States Courts (HTML) (PDF)

    Holly Munson is the Assistant Editor of Constitution Daily, the blog of the National Constitution Center.

    Also Read
     

    45 comments

    • EM  •  4 days ago
      The Ninth Circuit is a federal court that nearly always issues foolish decisions that get overturned on appeal.
    • David  •  3 mths ago
      well if we go based on what most of you are saying, let's put women's right to vote back up for a vote, let's put segregation up for a vote, let's put interracial marriage up for a vote, let's put abortion up for a vote, let's put slavery up for a vote. let the people in each state go back and individually decide on each human right as a taxpaying citizen. The bible should also be the law of the land, it says slavery is okay, it says selling your daughter is okay, marriages are arranged by your parents, you don't get a say. women should be submissive to their owner/husband for they are merely property. no more football, because the football is made of pigskin and that is unclean. Just a note, women, blacks and non taxpaying citizens don't get to vote either. one other thing only those that are christians living by the bible believing in God are allowed to vote. This is what your arguments are asking for and if you haven't followed every letter of every passage of the bible, not eaten shellfish, not touched your women during her menstrual cycle, not worn more than two kinds of fabric, not planted two different crops together, not coveted your neighbor's wife, not performed adultry, not honored your father and mother(ie: put them in a nursing home) you don't get to vote either, so only you if your perfect, white, and male get to vote. Oh #$%$ guess we have to go right back to the government to make our laws and rights for us, duh!!!!!!!!
    • Nerobama  •  Santa Clara, California  •  3 mths ago
      I am a fiscal conservative who is anti-big government, anti-free handouts and anti-tax increase. But when it comes to some social issues, the Democrats got it right: pro-choice and gay rights. Mind you, I am not for abortion, I think it should be the last resort. But at the end, a woman has the absolute right to her own body. No religion nor government can take that away. As to gay rights, I am not gay, but why can't gays get married if they truly love each other??? So, to the GOPs out there, please focus on the fiscal issues and just drop those right wing social issues, and GOP will get a majority support.
      • MH 3 mths ago
        I would agree with you. If the Republicans would actually be fiscally conservative without attempting to be socially reactionary, they could carry a large majority.
      • Nerobama 3 mths ago
        Or if the Democrats stop their crazy large government spending spree, I vote Democrats too. We need a third party.
    • Stan  •  Irvine, California  •  3 mths ago
      The Federal court system has over ridden "We The People".
      • MH 3 mths ago
        The Federal court system has protected "We The People" from ourselves. They have done exactly what they were supposed to do, protect the minority from the overreach of the majority.
      • A Yahoo! user 3 mths ago
        They conjure up rights that dont exist.
        As in a womans right to abortion.
        They pulled that right out of thin air.
    • Matthew  •  Boise, Idaho  •  3 mths ago
      The days of "We the People" are gone. I guess all the judges should make all the laws because we the people no longer know right from wrong, God please help this nation....
      • MH 3 mths ago
        The judges are doing what they should be doing...protecting the rights of the minority from the tyranny of the majority. Would you really want your rights put up for a vote?
      • Matthew 3 mths ago
        MH---You must be talking about gay marriage.
    • BrianD  •  3 mths ago
      The most overturned court in the country...
      • the 3 mths ago
        You'd better check your claim.
      • NamVetBuck 3 mths ago
        The = FACT CHECK The 9th has been overturned 45 % , making it the most overturned court in either state or Federal courts !
      • qwerty 3 mths ago
        Also referred to as the 9th Circus Court because of this...
    • north  •  Austin, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      Most perople feel that Judge Vaughn should resign due to conflict of interest because he is gay but then wouldn't a straight judge be just the same ? Any one that rules on this is going to have a conflict of interest.
      • MH 3 mths ago
        Wouldn't anyone who cast a ballot on it have a conflict of interest, seeing as they have taken a side?
      • TheWholeTruth 3 mths ago
        Judge Vaughn is not part of the 9th
    • Yellowhammer  •  3 mths ago
      Look at the U.S. Constitution, Amendments Ten and Fourteen.
      Both relate the Equality Clause in clear concise terms on the gay marriage concept!
      These are the basis for the unconstitutionality of the laws!
    • william w  •  Waco, Texas  •  3 mths ago
      does anyone know how many cases they hear a week? one a day? one a week doesn't sound like they work a whole lot. If they don't earn their keep lets remove them or have it done. petetion the house and senate. they can by special petetion have them removed without presidential authority. the two state senators from that district can write the proper documents.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  Traverse City, Michigan  •  3 mths ago
      My problem isn't whether they struck prop 8 down or not, but why any laws that have been voter written and voter approved are attacked by one branch of the government or another!
    • ww  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 mths ago
      for more years ! not in this country ! what a bunch of Pelosi's
    • The Wiz  •  Winter Park, Florida  •  3 mths ago
      The 9th Circuit Court also recently ruled that Nevada could apply changes to laws retroactively even though the Nevada Supreme Court and U.S. District Court ruled that the retroactive application of the laws violated the Nevada and U.S. Constitution's Ex-Post Facto Laws which specifically prohibit the creation and enforcement of Ex-Post Facto Laws. While the law in question concerned only a broad category of sex-offenders who everyone hates, the ruling by the 9th Circuit Court has very serious and very dangerous consequences for every other Citizen in that it sets a legal precedent which, if not reversed, will result in States or the Federal Government creating and enforcing Ex-Post Facto Laws on the rest of us! As American Citizens, we have a responsibility to keep our eyes on our government and courts to make sure that they uphold, support and defend the Constitution of The United States of America, which they swore to do when they took office. It is our duty as voters to make our voices heard to our officials that we will not tolerate un-American, un-Constitutional acts by our elected and appointed officials!
    • David W  •  St Louis, Missouri  •  3 mths ago
      can't have it both ways. either yea for the first civil war and the 9th circuit or nay. can't pick and choose.
    • Anti  •  Jacksonville, Florida  •  3 mths ago
      I guess 'We the Judges' overrule 'We the People'.

      Remember when judges based their rulings on the Constitution and the Law?

      Remember when states had rights that could reflect the will of their citizens?

      Remember when our votes used to count for something?
    • Michael  •  Lima, Peru  •  3 mths ago
      It's really the 9th CIRCUS court.
    • J G  •  3 mths ago
      Progressive Marxist Democrats who are now activist judges.
    • pt  •  3 mths ago
      In the land of the fruits, nuts and flakes the 9th circuit fits right in. Most overturned judicial body in the US.
    • Sherry  •  Doylestown, Pennsylvania  •  3 mths ago
      Yea, and back in the day, the majority of Americans were against women having a right to vote, and Blacks having laws of discrimination such as riding in the back of the bus and separqate restrooms...
    • Phillip  •  White Marsh, Maryland  •  3 mths ago
      Newt is correct.. We need to Limit the authority of the Federal Courts as per Article III of the Constitution and the Ninth circuit should be disbanded..
    • A Yahoo! user  •  3 mths ago
      Federal Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit.
      Run by Liberal Democrats and queers.
      To further the queers agenda.
    [ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]
    [ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]
    Loading...