U.S. Senate passes bill curtailing conflicts of interest in security clearance contracts
Private companies typically don’t fill out their own customer satisfaction surveys, and teachers are not generally allowed to pen their own evaluations. But the federal government sometimes pays contractors to perform quality checks on their own work, with predictably abusive consequences.
The most notorious, recent case involved a firm called U.S. Investigations Services, Inc., a Falls Church, VA-based company that was hired by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management to investigate the backgrounds of current or prospective federal employees who needed security clearances — as well as to perform a quality review of each background investigation before submitting it.
Instead, the contractor cut corners, and passed along thousands of background investigations to federal authorities without actually conducting the required quality reviews, according to the U.S. Justice Department.
On Sept. 19, however, half the Congress voted unanimously to prevent federal contractors that process security clearances from conducting quality reviews of their own work. The bill does not have a sponsor in the House of Representatives, but Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., the principal Senate author, said via a spokesperson that he is working to find one.
“We have been playing fast and loose with the background investigation process, and it’s past time to make wholesale reforms,” Tester said in prepared statement. “This bill is a step in the right direction, and I’m pleased it’s moving forward.”
The Obama administration says it supports the reform. “We applaud Senator Tester and the other members of the Committee for their unwavering commitment to improving the integrity of the background investigation process,” Susan Ruge, associate counsel to the Inspector General of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), said in an emailed statement after the Senate vote. She said it would help ensure background checks meet the "highest quality standards".
Related: Security clearance lapses stemmed from Washington’s heedless emphasis on speed over quality
There’s more to this story. Click here to read the rest at the Center for Public Integrity.
This story is part of Up in Arms. National security-related events, reports and findings that deserve more attention. Click here to read more stories in this blog.
Related stories
Security clearance lapses stemmed from Washington’s heedless emphasis on speed over quality
Federal contract employee reviewed 15,152 security clearances in a month, audit says
Dozens of intelligence contractors have submitted false claims for federal funds
Lawmakers complain about shoddy intelligence contractor database
Security lapse provokes new criticism of huge role played by costly intelligence contractors
Copyright 2014 The Center for Public Integrity. This story was published by The Center for Public Integrity, a nonprofit, nonpartisan investigative news organization in Washington, D.C.
