Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    The Week

    Virginia's new abortion law: 'State-sanctioned rape'?

    Gov. Bob McDonnell is on the cusp of signing an unpopular bill that would force many women to undergo an invasive sonogram before getting an abortion

    Virginia's Republican-controlled state legislature is expected to send Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) a controversial bill this week that would require all women seeking an abortion to undergo an ultrasound, in an apparent effort to reduce abortions by offering pregnant women the chance to see the fetus and hear its heartbeat before aborting it. McDonnell is expected to sign the bill into law, despite its lack of popularity. Fifty-five percent of Virginians oppose the bill and 36 percent support it in a new Richmond Times-Dispatch poll, and hundreds of female opponents silently protested in Virginia on Monday. Critics say the bill is worrisome in part because the only way to do an ultrasound early in pregnancy is by inserting a probe into a woman's vagina. "Let's start calling this what it really is: State-sanctioned rape," says Andy Kopsa at RH Reality Check. Is this hyperbole by abortion-rights advocates?

    Rape is an accurate description: Because the vast majority of abortions occur during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, this unconstitutional "abomination" of a law requires a transvaginal ultrasound for most women who want an abortion, says Dahlia Lithwick at Slate. Here's what that means: "A probe is inserted into the vagina, and then moved around until an ultrasound image is produced," for no medical reason. It's hard to see how that doesn't "constitute rape under state law."
    "Virginia's proposed ultrasound law Is an abomination"

    Don't insult rape victims: The Left is waging a "preposterous attack" on this bill, and doing "an enormous injustice to true rape victims," says Tina Korbe at Hot Air. Transvaginal sonograms will be more rare than critics allege, and even then, how are they like rape? It's not as if "an ultrasound is in any way sexual." And unlike rape, ultrasounds have "no real risk of negative consequences — like emotional trauma or STDs." This bill would just give women the information they need before making the serious and sometimes traumatic choice to have an abortion.
    "The Left's outrageous outrage at a proposal to require ultrasounds before abortion"

    This law isn't just "ugly," but futile: Virginia women who opt for abortion have already gone through state-mandated counseling, says the Staunton, Va., News Leader in an editorial. And having made their hard choice, a sonogram won't change their mind. "So what is left after this medically unnecessary probe... is an even more emotionally distraught Virginian left to try to recover and go on with her life." Abortion is divisive, but it's legal. Women shouldn't become collateral damage in anti-abortion lawmakers' "methodically angry attempt to thwart a law they don't like."
    "Virginia abortion bills denigrate all women"

    View this article on TheWeek.com Get 4 Free Issues of The Week

    Other stories from this topic:

    Like on Facebook - Follow on Twitter - Sign-up for Daily Newsletter

     

    78 comments

    • Donald  •  Wallingford, Connecticut  •  3 mths ago
      You anti abortion fools really don't care about "the child". You want to force all these women to maintain the pregnancy and deliver a child to satisfy your misguided religious fervor. BUT....that's where your interest and concern end. If the woman has no visible means of support, who is going to pay to raise that child that you forced her to have? NOT YOU!!!! You do not support welfare or any government programs for these women, there are no laws to force the father to support the child, so what happens to the child? It gets stuck in a bad situation, with many bad outcomes. Adoption? If the woman truly feels so emotionally traumatized by hearing her child's heartbeat on ultrasound, and decides to carry to term, she won't give it up for adoption! Will you force that too? Where does the money come from to pay for all the uninsured and underinsured women to get the ultrasounds and the delivery room costs? NOT FROM YOU!!!! You are going to have to get a father support law passed. OK, who pays for the paternity tests? NOT YOU!!!! Who pays for the jail time when the underemployed/unemployed Dad can't pay? NOT YOU!!!! Your motto should be; "Spit the kid out and you're on your own! Praise God!"
      • Phyllis 3 mths ago
        Did you ever hear of contraception?
        If you can't afford a child that's what you should be using!
      • 1IbigBIG1I 3 mths ago
        Contraception, huh? whats the party of no saying about that planned parenthood thing, Hmm?
      • cocheta 3 mths ago
        Contraception doesn't work 100% of the time.
    • R.  •  3 mths ago
      And oh, that's really some "small and non-intrusive government" you got going there, Republicans. They'd never dream of doing an equivalent kind of thing to men. Good Heavens, that would be, well, too unthinkably intrusive for words! Rotten hypocrites.
    • DarylS  •  Springfield, Tennessee  •  3 mths ago
      If 55% of the citizens of Virginia are opposed to this bill, it begs the question of who they voted for in the last election.
      • Windriver 3 mths ago
        55%+ oppose ObamaCare, same question you asked!
      • 1IbigBIG1I 3 mths ago
        Maybe you were lied to, both of you.
    • Mukluk Joe  •  3 mths ago
      This sounds like one of those unconstitutional mandates that I've read so much about.
    • Topkick  •  3 mths ago
      He might as well sign the Bill, provided its written on toilet paper. Because it will end up in the toilet. NO government agency has the right to even require a blood test or DNA sample without probable cause AND a court order. This goes even farther; therefore, nowhere on review!
      • steve 3 mths ago
        HA! Tell that to Texas's bill that a woman seeking abortion is required to see a sonogram of the baby!
      • Nmbr6 3 mths ago
        Well said. How ironic that the party braying about government intrusion into the private lives of Americans has passed this most intrusive of all legislation. It's bound to be overturned by the courts. A perfect example of legislative overreach.
      • Topkick 3 mths ago
        The Judge who struck it down was overruled by a three judge panel. It will go to SCOTUS, and hit the toilet there!
    • .  •  3 mths ago
      "Fifty-five percent of Virginians oppose the bill and 36 percent support it."

      So much for politicians doing the will of the people. They are promoting their own personal agendas. Period.
      • Windriver 3 mths ago
        55% or more are against ObamaCare so do you say the same thing?
      • Thomas 3 mths ago
        The people of CA. voted for prop 8 but 1 judge threw it out. That's how the libs do it.
      • John 3 mths ago
        We really should be calling it CongressCare, not ObamaCare. During the process, Congress distorted it so far from the original intent, to do exactly this kind of thing. Impose their own religious beliefs in what should have been free from religious influence, something every legal decision should be.
    • Hedsup  •  Tampa, Florida  •  3 mths ago
      It seems simple. If I put ANYTHING into a woman's vagina as part of a quid pro quo, or by force, or in any other way that she did not approve of, would I be subject to possible prosecution for a sexual crime? Yes! If I told a man that before he could have a prescription for Viagra, that he had to get a prostate exam that wasn't medically necessary, simply because I thought boner pills were immoral and I wanted to dissuade men from buying them, would he be angry? YES!!!!!
      • Chief568 3 mths ago
        Hedsup,

        Yes...but if the man wanted the Viagra badly enough, would he get the prostate exam? YES And if a woman wanted an abortion badly enough, would she get this procedure done. YES.

        So what is your point here?
      • Chief568 3 mths ago
        Oh and BTW, you get an exam by a gynocologist once a year because the doctor tells you you should. Is that considered rape too?
      • common sense 3 mths ago
        No. It isn't forced upon the woman against her will and without her consent. Her doctor may recommend a pap test, but it is entirely up to the discretion of the woman to decide whether she wants one or not.
    • v  •  3 mths ago
      So, if human life begins at conception, and the fertilized egg is endowed with an immortal soul, then what happens when the embryos of two fraternal twins merge together? (Tetragametic chimerism, which is rare, does occur naturally, sometimes producing a baby that looks and acts and develops completely normally but has two different sets of DNA in different parts of its body. Look up Lydia Fairchild and Karen Keegan.) Does this person have two souls?
    • T  •  3 mths ago
      I wish Tina Korbe of the aptly named "Hot Air' would share with us how this conservative big government bill in any way constitutes "less government" and "more personal freedom."

      Abort conservatives and their radical right-wing social engineering agenda in November.
    • SarahL.  •  3 mths ago
      Virginia will find itself bankrupt from lawsuits, thanks to this Medieval law. And I don't think for a minute that this disgusting rule wasn't deliberately put there for the sole purpose of shaming and humiliating women for wanting an abortion. "Information" indeed. Nonsense.
    • David  •  3 mths ago
      Once again the GOP attempts to stretch their Jesus nose all the way from Washington D.C. into the private lives and concerns of their employers (US)!
    • R.  •  3 mths ago
      This will be struck down by the SCOTUS, even conservative as they are. Requiring an invasion of her sexual organs before a woman can exercise her legal rights? Really? I propose a sonogram rammed up the Gov.'s butt before he exercises his rights!
    • Caren  •  3 mths ago
      Not only is it rape...but the women have been also denied their civil rights...abortion is legal, and they are doing nothing wrong. You cannot criminilize some thing that is legal
    • D P  •  3 mths ago
      And here we are again, the conservative branch imposing their "smaller government" on our personal rights. Also, prompting women to have children that they won't love or can't afford. Butt out, already.
    • ruth  •  3 mths ago
      Invasion of privacy .... if I don't want a sonogram, I shouldn't be forced to have one.
    • Bill  •  3 mths ago
      Sickening. Absolutely obscene state sanctioned rape. How much more punishment does a woman have to go through to satisfy these sanctimonious #$%$
    • M  •  3 mths ago
      Tina Korbe is a total idiot, and a dangerous person.

      By saying that these transvaginal probes are not in any way sexual, she is implying that rape IS in some way sexual.

      She is completely ignorant. Rape is never about sex it is always about power.

      And she thinks that being forced to have a probe inserted in your hoo-ha against your will for no good reason won't cause emotional trauma???!!!! What an idiot.
    • Elsie  •  Pleasanton, California  •  3 mths ago
      Veela, darling, leave us women who believe in choice alone, would you? You sound like the nuns who delivered my mother's fourth kid and told her to stop moaning for heck it couldn't hurt that much, could it? And unless you have been raped what would you know about a procedure in which you have something stuck into your vagina against your will. What makes you want to defend decisions behind which are basically only males trying to tell society's women and men where our places are? If you are happy where you are, great, but don't take the happiness of women away who disagree with you.
    • Leo  •  3 mths ago
      Virginians: this is what you get for electing a Republican Governor and a Republican majority in your law-making bodies. Draw your conclusions!
    • Eve  •  Omaha, Nebraska  •  3 mths ago
      "It's not as if "an ultrasound is in any way sexual."
      Rape isn't about the sex, it's about power of one person over another. And this law is about POWER of the GOVERNMENT over a women's body!
      STATE SANCTIONED RAPE!
      THIS is the definition of a government that is too big and too invasive into individuals lives!