COMMENTARY | Texas Gov. Rick Perry has his eye set on running in the 2012 presidential election. While he has explained that jobs would be his main concern, he has admitted that he would support a Constitutional Amendment that would take power to legalize gay marriage from the states and give the decision to the federal government. Perry, your support of this concept proves that you are mentally incapable of holding the presidency.
The Amendments
The role of the amendments is to ensure, and protect, rights. The few Amendments that have reduced people's rights have been written off of the Constitution by other Amendments. Perry's idea would limit the rights of the homosexual community and could easily be shot down by the Supreme Court since the interpretation of the court system is that the Constitution is to keep equality, not to take it away.
Separation of Church and State
I am not sure if anyone ever told Gov. Perry that this country was founded under the idea of the separation of church and state. His arguments against gay marriage are based on religion, not the equality of humankind. Presidents have to make decisions based on everyone's rights, not religion. Obviously, this is not a requirement for the top state position in Texas.
Ratified by the States
Gov. Perry might have slept in high school government class. When an Amendment is passed by Congress, it has to be ratified by the states. As a governor, he should know that the state do not like to give up rights to the federal government. There are dozens of proposed Amendments that have never been ratified by the states that involve the states giving more power to the federal government. Most have been tabled for decades. The holder of the highest office in the United States is required to understand the way the Constitution works.
A Republican?
Gov. Perry is listed as a Republican. An anti-gay marriage Amendment would give more power to the federal government. Traditionally, the Republicans believe that the states should have more power, and that the power of the federal government should be limited. He sounds more like a Democrat in wanting the federal government to take an ability from the state. Maybe he should figure out what party he belongs to before he runs for a higher office.




218 comments