Allow cameras in Trump courtroom: Jan. 6 trial an opportunity for national learning | Commentary

This commentary reflects the opinion of its writer, not necessarily of The Palm Beach Post Editorial Board.

In the landscape of American legal history, certain trials possess the potential to engage the nation not merely as legal battles but as educational opportunities. The upcoming trial of United States v. Donald J. Trump has captured the attention of the country, with a reach that extends beyond mere criminal procedure. Yet, an anachronistic barrier stands in the way of this learning opportunity: the prohibition of cameras in federal courtrooms. In an era where information flows freely at our fingertips, the question arises, shouldn't this trial, and all others in federal courts, be accessible to all?

Given today's digital access, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 53, which prohibits the broadcasting of federal judicial proceedings, seems antiquated. While there are valid concerns about the potential for grandstanding, the substantial educational benefits that could be gained from televising the trial cannot be overstated.

The Nuremberg Trials, post-World War II, set a precedent for televised proceedings. Broadcasting these trials unveiled the atrocities of Nazi war criminals to a global audience, emphasizing the necessity of justice and the horrors of unchecked power. The global access shaped public discourse on war crimes and accountability.

Jan. 6: Indictment makes Donald Trump the latest Florida man charged with leading Jan. 6 attack

Last week, almost three dozen House Democrats sent a letter requesting that the proceedings in the Trump matter are televised, to ensure “timely access to accurate and reliable information [of a trial with] national importance to our democratic institutions and the need for transparency.” The desire to ensure the proceedings are open to the public is not limited to the Schiff-led group of House Democrats; Trump's attorney, while doing “full Ginsburg” last Sunday, told CNN's Dana Bash that he wants people to see what is happening in the courtroom.

By transparently showcasing the legal process, we dispel myths and foster a culture of confidence in the judiciary, leading to well-grounded opinions. As Justice Louis Brandeis aptly observed, 'sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants,' emphasizing the crucial role of transparency in our legal system. This openness not only upholds the principles of justice but also reinforces public trust in our institutions.

Moreover, the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees the right to a public trial. This right carries profound implications, especially regarding courtroom accessibility. A notable affirmation of this principle is Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, where the Supreme Court acknowledged the public's entitlement to witness criminal trials. This decision underscored that open justice is foundational for sustaining public faith in judicial proceedings.

More: Trump post on Jan. 6 investigation renews questions about what took place in Palm Beach

Some might harbor concerns about the presence of cameras in the courtroom, fearing it could create an atmosphere more akin to entertainment than a solemn legal proceeding. The legal professionals engaged in this trial are not merely actors in a televised drama; they are officers of the court, committed to the pursuit of justice. Their responsibility to the law, the ethical standards of their profession, and the solemnity of the proceedings would serve as natural checks against theatrics. Oversight from experienced judges, clear guidelines on courtroom conduct, and the inherent seriousness of the charges at hand should act as a safeguard against undue theatricality.

In shifting our perspective, we must recognize that the trial of United States v. Donald J. Trump is a chance to educate on a national scale. This is not merely about politics or sensation; it is an extraordinary opportunity to understand the workings of our legal system and reassure the public that all are treated fairly. By amending the rules to allow cameras in courtrooms, we can turn this significant legal proceeding into a moment of learning and civic engagement while honoring the spirit of the Sixth Amendment.

Andrew Grub is a resident of Weston and a student at American University`s School of Public Affairs in Washington, D.C., studying political science and business.

This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Allow cameras in Trump Jan. 6 courtroom | Commentary