Biden administration urges Supreme Court to revive student loan forgiveness plan

David G. Savage
·2 min read
31
FILE - President Joe Biden speaks in the South Court Auditorium on the White House complex in Washington, April 28, 2022. Biden needs to make a decision about cancelling student debt. For student loan activists, the past week began with hope as Biden gave his clearest indication that he was considering canceling federal debt rather than simply allowing borrowers to defer payments during the pandemic. But that soon gave way to disappointment when Biden signaled days later that any debt relief would be much less than activists wanted. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
President Biden, shown in April, announced in August a plan to forgive up to $20,000 in student loan debt for qualifying borrowers. (Susan Walsh / Associated Press)

The Biden administration asked the Supreme Court on Friday to lift lower court orders and clear the way for the Education Department to forgive millions of student loans.

At issue is whether conservative lower courts can block the program indefinitely.

In August, President Biden said the government would forgive up to $20,000 in loans for qualifying borrowers, based on a 2003 law that granted relief to those affected by war or a national emergency.

Both the Trump and Biden administrations cited the pandemic as a national emergency that justified a pause in loan repayments.

But Republican state attorneys general and conservative advocacy groups say Biden did not have the authority to forgive $400billion or more in loans.

Acting on a lawsuit brought by six Republican state attorneys general, the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis issued a nationwide order to block the loan forgiveness plan. A judge in Texas also declared the plan illegal, ruling the president had exceeded his authority.

Rather than wait months for a final ruling, U.S. Solicitor Gen. Elizabeth Prelogar filed an emergency appeal asking the Supreme Court to intervene and set aside the lower court orders. She said the judges had exceeded their authority by issuing broad orders based on a very thin claim of harm.

“The 8th Circuit’s erroneous injunction leaves millions of economically vulnerable borrowers in limbo, uncertain about the size of their debt and unable to make financial decisions with an accurate understanding of their future repayment obligations,” she told the court.

She said the lower-court judges ignored the fact that there was no evidence the states or individuals would suffer harm if some students had their loans forgiven.

A lower-court judge in St. Louis had dismissed the suit brought by the six states, ruling that none of the plaintiffs had standing to sue.

The states contended that the Missouri Higher Education Loan Authority, or MOHELA, a nonprofit entity that services student loans, could lose revenue if there were fewer loans, and that the state could be required to make up the difference.

Prelogar said the nonprofit is independent of the state, which “has no legal obligation to pay MOHELA’s debts.”

Nonetheless, a three-judge panel of the 8th Circuit Court said the state could suffer a potential loss, which the panel said was sufficient basis for blocking Biden’s plan nationwide.

The justices asked for a response from the states by Wednesday.

The case is Biden vs. State of Nebraska.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.