'Cancel culture': Supreme Court rejects case on dust-up between Catholic student and Native American

WASHINGTON − The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear the case of a former Kentucky high school student and supporter of Donald Trump who said he'd been the victim of "cancel culture" after a video of his interaction with an elderly Native American man went viral in 2019.

That decision leaves in place a lower court's dismissal of a massive libel lawsuit filed by Nicholas Sandmann against Gannett, the parent company of USA TODAY, and other media organizations for their coverage of the incident.

Sandmann argued he was defamed by their reports on his confrontation with Native American rights activist Nathan Phillips at the Lincoln Memorial in January 2019.

Indigenous People's March and March for Life, standing nose-to-nose

A video of Sandmann, then 16 and a student at Covington Catholic in Northern Kentucky, standing nose to nose with Phillips went viral and unleashed a firestorm of internet criticism that the student’s conduct was racially motivated, which Sandmann denied. Phillips was attending an “Indigenous People’s March” while Sandmann was walking in a “March for Life” event.

More: Abortion pill challenge gives Supreme Court chance to move toward national abortion ban

Sandmann filed lawsuits against eight media organizations, including the New York Times, ABC News, CBS News and Rolling Stone magazine, seeking a combined $1.25 billion for their coverage of the event.

A federal judge in Kentucky dismissed the suit in 2022, ruling that Phillips’ statement that Sandmann “blocked him and wouldn’t allow him to retreat” – as reported by the media – was Phillips' opinion for which they could not be sued.

The Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the judge's dismissal.

In Sandmann's unsuccessful petition to the Supreme Court, his lawyer said the case has "come to epitomize the high-water mark of the `cancel culture.'"

Sandmann, his lawyer said, was transformed “from a quiet, anonymous teenager into a national social pariah, one whose embarrassed smile in response to Phillips’ aggression became a target for anger and hatred.”

That happened because of the media’s “careless failure” to investigate Phillips’ description of the encounter, his lawyer told the court.

The U.S. Supreme Court
The U.S. Supreme Court

A teen with a 'Make America Great Again' hat becomes a conservative cause celebre

The suit became a cause celebre for conservatives and talk show hosts.

Then-President Trump defended Sandmann and his fellow student on Twitter, claiming that they had been "smeared" with false reports by the media.

In a speech at the 2020 Republican National Convention, Sandmann accused the media of trying to “cancel” him because he backed Trump.

In the 2019 video that went viral, Sandmann was shown wearing one of Trump’s “Make America Great Again” campaign hats while smiling at Phillips, who was beating a drum and chanting.

More: Supreme Court lets stand a ban against Cowboys for Trump co-founder using 14th Amendment

Some social media at the time claimed the incident was racially charged on the part of the white teenager, which Sandmann and other witnesses disputed. Sandmann sued, saying the news coverage had unfairly defamed him.

But the suit was narrowed by the judge to focus only on whether the quote attributed to Phillips was defamatory.

“The media defendants were covering a matter of great public interest, and they reported Phillips’s first-person view of what he experienced,” U.S. Senior Judge William Bertelsman wrote when dismissing the suit in 2022.

When Sandmann appealed to the Supreme Court, the media outlets waived their right to respond.

The Washington Post, NBC and CNN had previously settled with Sandmann.

This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Supreme Court won't hear Nicholas Sandmann 'cancel culture' case