Citing ‘ongoing’ probe, judge in Cohen case agrees to keep search warrants redacted

LUCIEN BRUGGEMAN

Citing ‘ongoing’ probe, judge in Cohen case agrees to keep search warrants redacted originally appeared on abcnews.go.com

A trove of documents related to the government’s case against Michael Cohen, the president’s onetime personal attorney, will remain redacted for now, a federal judge ruled Tuesday, after prosecutors informed the court that some information in them pertains to “an ongoing investigation.”

Judge William Pauley’s ruling on Tuesday suggests the government’s probe of potential campaign finance violations during the 2016 presidential election remains active. During his plea hearing last year, Cohen implicated his former boss in the scheme.

(MORE: Judge orders release of Michael Cohen's unsealed search warrants related to FBI raids)

“In view of the ongoing aspects of the government's investigation,” Pauley wrote Tuesday, “this court determines that continued redaction of the materials is justified at this juncture.”

PHOTO: Michael Cohen, the former personal attorney of President Donald Trump, testifies at a House Committee on Oversight and Reform hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., Feb. 27, 2019. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters, FILE)

The “materials” to which Pauley referred include nearly 900 pages of previously sealed court records describing the basis for an April 2018 search on Cohen’s home, office, and hotel room.

(MORE: Michael Cohen sentenced to 3 years in prison, blames President Trump for his 'path of darkness')

Cohen, who is currently serving a three-year prison sentence, pleaded guilty in 2018 to campaign finance violations, tax evasion, and lying to Congress.

Federal prosecutors accused Cohen of violating campaign finance laws by paying off two women who allege to have had affairs with Donald Trump. Cohen, at his plea hearing, said he acted “in coordination with and at the direction of” the then-candidate to execute the payments.

Trump has argued the payments amount to nothing more than a “simple private transaction,” and do not qualify as campaign finance violations.

On Tuesday, Pauley asked prosecutors to justify their request to keep certain information secret by July 15, at which time the government must “[identify] the individuals or entities subject to any ongoing investigations and [explain] any need for continued redaction.”