Texas executes David Renteria in 2001 abduction, murder of El Paso girl

UPI
In 2003, David Renteria was convicted of killing 5-year-old Alexandra Flores while he was on probation for indecency with a child. Photo courtesy of Texas Department of Criminal Justice

Nov. 16 (UPI) --

The state of Texas executed David Renteria, 53, on Thursday evening for the 2001 murder of Alexandra Flores, which he maintained he did not commit.

Renteria was the eighth person executed in Texas this year.

Earlier in the day, Renteria's pending legal efforts to halt his execution included a petition in front of the U.S. Supreme Court that alleged the El Paso District Attorney's Office violated Renteria's constitutional rights by failing to turn over case documents.

In 2003, Renteria was convicted of killing Alexandra while he was on probation for indecency with a child. Security camera footage showed a man who appeared to be Renteria leading 5-year-old Flores out of an El Paso Walmart on Nov. 18, 2001, according to court documents. The girl was Christmas shopping with her family when she disappeared.

The next day, her partially burned body was found in an alley 16 miles from the store. An autopsy found she was hit twice in the head and strangled by hand before being set on fire.

A jury sentenced Renteria to death. Five years later, after an automatic appeal resulted in the same conviction from an appeals court, Renteria again received a death sentence.

Renteria claimed Barrio Azteca gang members forced him to kidnap the child and dispose of her body, according to court documents, but he maintained he did not murder the girl. Renteria said he feared for his family's safety if he refused to help the gang members, who he alleges murdered Alexandra.

After the El Paso District Attorney's Office declined to turn over case files related to the murder to Renteria's lawyers earlier this year -- which the office had done for a previous capital case -- his legal team asked District Judge Monique Velarde Reyes to postpone the execution.

Renteria's attorneys argued that declining to produce documents related to the case, which they suspected contained information about the involvement of gang members in the crime, violated his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection.

On Aug. 29, Reyes granted that request, ordering the district attorney's office to produce the documents and postponed Renteria's Nov. 16 execution date indefinitely.

El Paso District Attorney Bill Hicks appealed Reyes' order, questioning if the judge has the authority to postpone the execution. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals -- the state's highest criminal appeals court -- heard the appeal and overturned Reyes' order, rescheduling Renteria's execution date.

"Without a pleading before [Reyes] invoking a legitimate source of district-court jurisdiction, [Reyes] had no freewheeling jurisdiction to seek to safeguard Renteria's 14th Amendment rights," the appeals court wrote in its September order.

Renteria's lawyers subsequently filed a petition for removal to bring the case in front of federal courts. Last month, U.S. District Judge Frank Montalvo denied Renteria's motion.

"We are basically saying we have been shut out of this equal protection claim that the El Paso district judge found had merit," said Humphreys McGee, an assistant federal public defender in the Capital Habeas Unit, who is representing Renteria.

Renteria's legal team appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied Renteria's motion earlier this week.

The controversy has not stopped the Texas Department of Criminal Justice from extending the use-by dates of its lethal doses of pentobarbital, the only drug used in Texas executions, after retesting their potency levels. Similar legal challenges to halt executions in light of the practice have been unsuccessful this year.

The Texas Tribune is a member-supported, nonpartisan newsroom informing and engaging Texans on state politics and policy. Learn more at texastribune.org.