‘Imminent threat’: Democrats make final case to remove Trump

President Donald Trump remains an “imminent threat to the integrity of our democracy,” the House’s top impeachment manager Adam Schiff argued Friday in an extraordinary Senate-floor appeal in which he accused Trump of embracing Russian propaganda at the expense of U.S. national security.

“The threat that he will continue to abuse his power and cause grave harm to the nation over the course of the next year … is not hypothetical,” Schiff argued. “Merely exposing the president's scheme has not stopped him from continuing this destructive pattern of behavior that has brought us to this somber moment. He is who he is.”

Schiff’s appeal was part of the House’s final attempt to break Trump’s Republican firewall in the Senate, where Democrats face long odds to win GOP support for their effort to convict Trump on charges that he pressured Ukraine to investigate his Democratic rivals — and then tried to cover it up.

In a final crescendo late Friday, Schiff recited the two articles of impeachment against Trump, declaring intermittently that each allegation “has been proved.” He also offered an extended appeal to "moral courage" — one aimed implicitly but squarely at the handful of Republican senators who say they're open-minded — by suggesting that true courage "comes not from disagreeing with your opponents but from disagreeing with your friends."

Schiff also used his final speech to run through a litany of anticipated defenses by Trump's lawyers, who begin their own defense on Saturday, and attempted to knock down each one. He told senators to ignore arguments that the House's impeachment was partisan or that it was procedurally defective, contending that such excuses were an attempt to distract from Trump's own conduct.

Moments before the clock struck 9 p.m., Schiff ceded the floor, concluding a three-day argument after delivering his most visceral remarks yet — a warning that Senate Republicans, too, could someday be targeted by Trump.

“I'll tell you something, the next time it just may be you. It just may be you,” Schiff warned. “Do you think for a moment that any of you, no matter what your relationship with this president, no matter how close you are to this president, do you think for a moment that if he felt it was in his interest, he wouldn't ask you to be investigated? And if somewhere deep down below you realize that he would you cannot leave a man like that in office when he has violated the constitution.”

On their final day of arguments, Democrats continued to toggle between exhaustive recitations of the evidence and appeals to senators’ consciences — saving their loftiest and most potent arguments for the primetime audience. They’re also making one last plea for Senate Republicans to call witnesses in the trial, most prominently acting White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton. Other witnesses have described both as central players with firsthand knowledge of the events at the heart of the Ukraine scandal.

Democrats focused the remainder of their arguments on the charge that Trump obstructed Congress’ investigation of the Ukraine matter. He directed about a dozen high-level witnesses not to cooperate with the House’s probe, including Mulvaney, Bolton and senior officials in the White House budget office. Many of the 17 witnesses who testified before House investigators — including several senior White House and State Department officials — defied Trump’s orders.

Those witnesses provided the backbone of the allegations that Trump pressed Ukraine’s newly elected president, Volodymyr Zelensky, to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, as well as a debunked conspiracy theory, promoted by Russia, that Ukraine — not Russia — hacked a Democratic Party server in 2016. Those witnesses provided evidence that Trump withheld $391 million in military aid to Ukraine and a White House visit for Zelensky amid Ukraine’s active war against Russian aggression, as part of the alleged pressure campaign.

Schiff broadened his case Friday afternoon, tying Trump’s Ukraine scandal to his 2018 press conference alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, in which he raised the conspiracy theory about the server.

“It's a breathtaking success of Russian intelligence. I don't know if there's ever been a greater success of Russian intelligence. Whatever profile Russia did of our president, boy did they have him spot on — flattery and propaganda, flattery and propaganda is all Russia needed,” Schiff said. He added, “This is just the most incredible propaganda coup because as I said yesterday, it's not just that the president of the United States standing next to Vladimir Putin is reading Kremlin talking points. He won't read his own national security staff talking points.”

If Democrats hope to call any witnesses, they need to convince at least four Republican senators to join them, and their final arguments will likely reflect that effort. Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Mitt Romney of Utah, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee are seen as the likeliest group, with Alexander — a close ally of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell — the linchpin.

Democrats are also reinforcing their case that the Senate must demand documents from the White House and State Department that Trump refused to provide. The House’s seven impeachment prosecutors have contended that in some ways they’d even prefer to obtain the documents to witnesses, whose memories might be flawed or influenced by subsequent testimony.

Throughout their testimony, the impeachment managers have emphasized holes in the full Ukraine story that could only be filled by specific documents that they know exist but that Trump has withheld from Congress. They include correspondence, like former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Bill Taylor’s cable to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo worrying about the hold on military aid. They also include the notes kept by Trump’s former national security aide Fiona Hill and contacts between Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani and senior members of the State Department and White House.

So far, most Republicans have shown no signs of budging. While Romney and Collins are likely to support efforts to obtain additional witness testimony and documents, it remains unclear if two more GOP senators will ultimately vote alongside Democrats to demand more information.

Democratic aides working on the trial said they tailored the final argument toward what they’ve termed the “two juries” — the senators who will decide Trump’s fate, and the American public, whose sentiments may guide them.

Schiff was once again Democrats’ closer for a third straight night.

He concluded the first day with a call for senators to “show the courage” that witnesses like Marie Yovanovitch, the former U.S. ambassador to Ukraine who was the subject of a smear campaign by Trump associates, showed in testifying over the president’s wishes.

On the second night, Schiff challenged senators to consider whether any of them doubt that the scheme Democrats allege is really out of character for Trump.

“Does anybody really question whether the president is capable of what he’s charged with? No one is really making the argument, ‘Donald Trump would never do such a thing,’” he said. “Because, of course, we know that he would and of course we know that he did.”

In his final remarks Friday night, before the White House defense team begins its rebuttal on Saturday, Schiff appeared to rankle some Republican senators when he quoted from a CBS story suggesting the White House had threatened GOP senators who didn't close ranks around Trump. Several senators openly protested as he read it, and some later suggested it undercut remarks that were otherwise well-delivered.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), one of Trump's loudest defenders, even hailed the entire three-day presentation by Democrats as delivered primarily in a "professional, articulate manner respectful of the body."

"They were prepared and very, very, very thorough," he said. "The other side of the story will be presented tomorrow and then we decide."

Andrew Desiderio contributed to this report.