Of all the dumb ideas, using the Constitution to kick Trump off the ballot is the dumbest

Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes is still considering whether he has the authority to boot Donald Trump from the state's ballot.
Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes is still considering whether he has the authority to boot Donald Trump from the state's ballot.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

Colorado this week became the third state in which watchdog groups have headed to court, hoping to use the 14th Amendment to bar Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot.

It is not off the table that Arizona could join the drive to deny Trump a spot on the presidential ticket.

Last week, Democratic Secretary of State Adrian Fontes told both KTAR and The Arizona Republic that he doesn’t believe he has the authority to reject Trump, given an Arizona Supreme Court ruling last year.

But he also made it clear that he doesn’t agree with that ruling and is still looking into the possibility of bouncing the Republican frontrunner off the ballot.

Some scholars say Trump can be booted

“The secretary believes that this is an open question,” his spokesman Paul Smith-Leonard told me on Friday. “He’s consulting legal experts, he’s looking at past precedents and he is deciding how to decide on this question.”

Respectfully, Mr. Fontes. Don’t go there.

This is surely one of dumbest, most undemocratic ideas to come down the electoral pike in a long while. And in Arizona, that is saying something.

There is growing talk among legal scholars, including some respected conservatives, that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution could and should be used to stop the Trump juggernaut.

Specifically, Section 3, the post-Civil War amendment that disqualifies from office anyone who previously has taken the oath of office to support the Constitution then engaged in “insurrection or rebellion” against the government.

The scholarly set, along with a fair number of anti-Trump Republicans and Democrats, would tell you that Section 3 has Trump’s name written all over it.

Trump wasn't charged with insurrection

The problem is this:

Who decides whether Trump — or state Sens./Fake Electors Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern or U.S. Reps. Andy Biggs and Paul Gosar — engaged in insurrection or rebellion?

None of them has been charged with that crime (U.S. Code Section 2383), let alone been convicted.

Do I get to decide if their actions have disqualified them from the ballot? Do you?

Does Fontes?

Trump is charged with trying to obstruct a federal proceeding, in this case the certification that Joe Biden won the election. But prosecutor Jack Smith didn’t charge Trump with engaging in rebellion or insurrection, and I assume he wouldn’t have been shy about doing so had he thought he could get a conviction.

So who gets to decide if obstruction is close enough to insurrection to deny Trump a spot on the ballot?

Do I get to decide? Do you?

Does Fontes?

Republicans already say elections are unfair

For three years now, Republicans have been complaining that our elections aren’t fair, that Trump’s opponents had their thumb on the scale. That there was a conspiracy to rob “We the People” (meaning, them) of our constitutional right to select our leaders.

Now comes this 14th Amendment stunt to reinforce their beliefs.

I’ve heard all the high-minded constitutional talk of how you don’t have to be charged or even convicted of insurrection to be disqualified for insurrection. How it is “self evident” that Trump’s actions amounted to insurrection.

Montini: Constitution should keep Trump off the ballot

With every poll that’s released, I can smell the desperation of those who say we need to protect our country from the scourge that is Trump.

They want to prevent democracy in order to save democracy.

They want to ignore due process in order achieve justice.

Want to beat Trump? Put up a better canddiate

If Trump’s opponents are truly that terrified that he might win, here’s an idea:

Nominate a candidate who could beat him.

Find someone who isn’t a tottering 81 year old to put forth as the next leader of the free world — someone who doesn’t look like he should be running for president of the Golden Acres rest home.

Ultimately, if Fontes or any other secretary of state decrees that Donald Trump is not qualified to run for president, there will be a four-year coast-to-coast serenade of I told you so’s from the likes of Kari Lake, Marjorie Taylor Greene and the rest of the MAGA chorus.

Then it’ll land in the courts.

And I think we all know which court will have the final say.

Don’t do it, Secretary Fontes.

You want to beat Trump?

Do it the old fashioned, fundamentally, quintessentially American way.

Let’s vote.

Reach Roberts at laurie.roberts@arizonarepublic.com. Follow her on X, formerly known as Twitter, at @LaurieRoberts.

Support local journalism: Subscribe to azcentral.com today.

This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Kick Trump off the ballot? What a ridiculously dumb idea